This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/trafficandcommuting/costly-new-lights-go-dark-on-naval-academy-bridge/2016/01/03/591213d6-b26b-11e5-9388-466021d971de_story.html
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Costly new lights go dark on Naval Academy Bridge | Costly new lights go dark on Naval Academy Bridge |
(about 13 hours later) | |
In the evenings, while driving home, Michael O’Neil and his daughter play a game while crossing the Naval Academy Bridge: Count the lights out. | |
Madilyn might count 27; her father gets 29. | Madilyn might count 27; her father gets 29. |
Whatever the number, O’Neil says, it’s too many for the graceful bridge, which arcs nearly 90 feet above the Severn River. | |
“What the heck is going on? It’s been like that for months,” said O’Neil, who lives in Annapolis. | “What the heck is going on? It’s been like that for months,” said O’Neil, who lives in Annapolis. |
In August 2014, crews replaced poles and fixtures with decorative, energy-efficient LED lighting. That project cost $350,000. | In August 2014, crews replaced poles and fixtures with decorative, energy-efficient LED lighting. That project cost $350,000. |
Today, more than 30 of the 80 lights are dark. | Today, more than 30 of the 80 lights are dark. |
State officials are aware of the outages, said Charlie Gischlar, spokesman for the Maryland State Highway Administration, and are working to determine what happened and plan repairs. | State officials are aware of the outages, said Charlie Gischlar, spokesman for the Maryland State Highway Administration, and are working to determine what happened and plan repairs. |
“They should last years and years,” Gischlar said. “There’s clearly something wrong.” | “They should last years and years,” Gischlar said. “There’s clearly something wrong.” |
After installation, the LED lights ran day and night for one month — a test burn. Everything worked, Gischlar said. Months later, lights started malfunctioning. It’s unclear whether the state will have to pay for repairs. | |
“I don’t know at this point,” he said. “We signed off on it. The system was totally operational.” | “I don’t know at this point,” he said. “We signed off on it. The system was totally operational.” |
The original lights were installed when the bridge opened, in 1994, but they corroded over the years. | |
The bridge itself was a source of contention. It replaced a 1920s drawbridge that blocked traffic into Annapolis whenever it was raised. The current bridge, which carries Route 450 over the river, was designed and built in three years for $34 million. The 2,835-foot span carries an average of 17,000 cars and trucks daily, Gischlar said. | |
Two years before it opened, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit threw out a lawsuit by neighbors trying to block the construction. | Two years before it opened, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit threw out a lawsuit by neighbors trying to block the construction. |
The residents worried that a new bridge would bring more traffic and that the bridge would become a drag strip. | The residents worried that a new bridge would bring more traffic and that the bridge would become a drag strip. |
O’Neil said the outages make for dim conditions on the bridge’s bike lane. | O’Neil said the outages make for dim conditions on the bridge’s bike lane. |
“Even with the outages,” Gischlar said, “there is more than sufficient operational lighting.” | “Even with the outages,” Gischlar said, “there is more than sufficient operational lighting.” |
— Baltimore Sun |
Previous version
1
Next version