This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-35298770

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Ofwat blamed for high water bills by committee of MPs Ofwat blamed for high water bills by committee of MPs
(about 5 hours later)
Millions of households in England and Wales are paying too much for their water supply because of poor oversight by Ofwat, says a committee of MPs.Millions of households in England and Wales are paying too much for their water supply because of poor oversight by Ofwat, says a committee of MPs.
A report from the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) said the regulator consistently overestimated water companies' costs.A report from the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) said the regulator consistently overestimated water companies' costs.
It said many householders would be "appalled" to learn their water bills could have been smaller.It said many householders would be "appalled" to learn their water bills could have been smaller.
Ofwat said it would "carefully consider" the PAC's report.Ofwat said it would "carefully consider" the PAC's report.
Household water bills averaged just under £400 per year last year.Household water bills averaged just under £400 per year last year.
WindfallWindfall
The committee of MPs said Ofwat regularly overestimated companies' financing and tax costs when setting price caps.The committee of MPs said Ofwat regularly overestimated companies' financing and tax costs when setting price caps.
The PAC said this meant the companies had made windfall gains of at least £1.2bn between them.The PAC said this meant the companies had made windfall gains of at least £1.2bn between them.
It is asking Ofwat to review the way it assesses companies' cost of debt and tax and report back on how it intends to improve.It is asking Ofwat to review the way it assesses companies' cost of debt and tax and report back on how it intends to improve.
The MPs also said they were worried about customers in areas where water was scarce paying to develop new capacity, despite the possibility that water trading between companies would be brought in in the future.The MPs also said they were worried about customers in areas where water was scarce paying to develop new capacity, despite the possibility that water trading between companies would be brought in in the future.
MonopolyMonopoly
Ofwat came into being to oversee the 18 privately owned companies that supply separate areas with water and sewerage services after the service was privatised in 1989.Ofwat came into being to oversee the 18 privately owned companies that supply separate areas with water and sewerage services after the service was privatised in 1989.
They currently operate as local monopolies but the government has announced plans to free the market for limited competition between suppliers by the end of this parliament in 2020.They currently operate as local monopolies but the government has announced plans to free the market for limited competition between suppliers by the end of this parliament in 2020.
The choice will involve services such as billing and customer services, but not the water supply itself.The choice will involve services such as billing and customer services, but not the water supply itself.
In Scotland, business customers can already choose such suppliers.In Scotland, business customers can already choose such suppliers.
'Priority''Priority'
PAC chairwoman Meg Hillier said: "Ofwat was set up to protect the interests of customers, most of whom have no choice over who supplies their water yet must pay bills typically running to hundreds of pounds.PAC chairwoman Meg Hillier said: "Ofwat was set up to protect the interests of customers, most of whom have no choice over who supplies their water yet must pay bills typically running to hundreds of pounds.
"Many householders will therefore be appalled to learn these bills could have been smaller had Ofwat adopted a different approach to setting price limits for water companies."Many householders will therefore be appalled to learn these bills could have been smaller had Ofwat adopted a different approach to setting price limits for water companies.
"This approach must be reviewed as a priority.""This approach must be reviewed as a priority."
Ofwat chief executive Cathryn Ross said: "Holding companies to account and protecting customers is at the heart of what we do.Ofwat chief executive Cathryn Ross said: "Holding companies to account and protecting customers is at the heart of what we do.
"That's why we've made sure bills will fall by 5% by 2020. We will carefully consider the thoughts of the PAC.""That's why we've made sure bills will fall by 5% by 2020. We will carefully consider the thoughts of the PAC."
She added: "If companies don't step up - we'll step in."She added: "If companies don't step up - we'll step in."
Consumer Council for Water chief executive Tony Smith said the PAC findings "echo the concerns we have repeatedly raised with Ofwat that it has been too generous to water companies in past price settlements, to the detriment of water customers."Consumer Council for Water chief executive Tony Smith said the PAC findings "echo the concerns we have repeatedly raised with Ofwat that it has been too generous to water companies in past price settlements, to the detriment of water customers."
The consumer group added that Ofwat "needs to... deliver a fair balance between company shareholders and customers".The consumer group added that Ofwat "needs to... deliver a fair balance between company shareholders and customers".
Are your water bills over £400, if so why do you think that is? Do you feel Ofwat has overestimated water companies' costs? Let us know about your experiences. Email haveyoursay@bbc.co.uk with your stories.
Please include a contact number if you are willing to speak to a BBC journalist. You can also contact us in the following ways:
Or use the form below