This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/14/world/europe/research-doesnt-back-a-link-between-migrants-and-crime-in-us.html

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Research Doesn’t Back a Link Between Migrants and Crime in U.S. Research Doesn’t Back a Link Between Migrants and Crime in U.S.
(about 2 hours later)
In America, as in Europe, anti-immigrant backlashes have often followed episodes in which foreigners are blamed for crimes and other problems. But statistical studies show that in the United States, at least, immigrants are far more law-abiding than natives, regardless of race, class or education.In America, as in Europe, anti-immigrant backlashes have often followed episodes in which foreigners are blamed for crimes and other problems. But statistical studies show that in the United States, at least, immigrants are far more law-abiding than natives, regardless of race, class or education.
“Immigrants have always been a convenient scapegoat,” Walter A. Ewing, a senior researcher at the American Immigration Council, a nonprofit group in Washington, said on Wednesday.“Immigrants have always been a convenient scapegoat,” Walter A. Ewing, a senior researcher at the American Immigration Council, a nonprofit group in Washington, said on Wednesday.
“It’s always easy to blame the other group for all of society’s problems,” said Mr. Ewing in a telephone interview. While the immigration circumstances of Europe and the United States are obviously different, he said, “there’s a universality to xenophobia, a knee-jerk reaction. It’s fear, lashing out at what you’re afraid of.”“It’s always easy to blame the other group for all of society’s problems,” said Mr. Ewing in a telephone interview. While the immigration circumstances of Europe and the United States are obviously different, he said, “there’s a universality to xenophobia, a knee-jerk reaction. It’s fear, lashing out at what you’re afraid of.”
Mr. Ewing and Rubén G. Rumbaut, a sociology professor at University of California in Irvine, collaborated on a 2007 study, based on official crime and census data, that methodically refuted what they described as the “myth of immigrant criminality” in the United States. Mr. Ewing collaborated with Rubén G. Rumbaut, a sociology professor at University of California in Irvine, and Daniel E. Martinez, an assistant sociology professor at George Washington University, on a study released this past July that used census data, F.B.I. data and other statistical data to rebut stereotypes about immigrants. It showed, for example, that between 1990 and 2013, as the foreign-born share of the United States population nearly doubled and the number of unauthorized immigrants more than tripled, violent crime declined 48 percent and property crime fell 41 percent.
It found that for “every ethnic group without exception, incarceration rates among young men are lowest among immigrants, even those who are the least educated.” The study also showed that incarceration rates of native-born Americans were far higher than of migrants.
Part of the misperception of higher immigrant criminality in the United States, their study said, may be rooted in immigrants who enter the country illegally or overstay their visas, which has been framed by anti-immigrant partisans as a blatant disregard for the law. “This association has flourished in a post-9/11 climate of fear and ignorance where terrorism and undocumented immigration often are mentioned in the same breath,” the study said. Such findings, the study said, reiterated what other research had confirmed for more than a century: “The overwhelming majority of immigrants are not ‘criminals’ by any commonly accepted definition of the term.”
Mr. Rumbaut said in a telephone interview that the authors of the study, which had been in the works for more than a year, gave it a wide release through the American Immigration Council, rather than as a more obscure scholarly publication, to counter a surge of anti-immigrant political talk at the time.
“An immigrant does not come here to commit crimes and get on welfare,” Mr. Rumbaut said. “They come here to work harder than native-born people do.”
While the latest anti-immigrant reactions in the United States have not been as brazen as the backlashes seen recently in Finland, Germany and Italy, the perceived connection between foreigners and crime has been a dominant theme on both sides of the Atlantic.While the latest anti-immigrant reactions in the United States have not been as brazen as the backlashes seen recently in Finland, Germany and Italy, the perceived connection between foreigners and crime has been a dominant theme on both sides of the Atlantic.
Donald J. Trump, the Republican presidential candidate, for example, has been widely accused of stoking anti-immigrant passions by proposing a wall to keep out what he described as rapacious Mexicans, and a moratorium on travel to the United States by all Muslims from abroad because they might include terrorists.Donald J. Trump, the Republican presidential candidate, for example, has been widely accused of stoking anti-immigrant passions by proposing a wall to keep out what he described as rapacious Mexicans, and a moratorium on travel to the United States by all Muslims from abroad because they might include terrorists.
Mr. Rumbaut said that the evidence refuting immigrant criminality “goes back well over 100 years” in the United States but the perception has survived and thrived. Mr. Rumbaut said that the perception of immigrant illegality has thrived regardless of evidence that refutes it.
“It’s a ‘zombie idea’ — one that keeps coming back from the dead,” he said in an email. “It’s a ‘zombie idea’ — one that keeps coming back from the dead,” he said.
“It is but one of related myths about immigrants that seem never to die despite compelling evidence to the contrary,” he said, “i.e., that immigrants bring both crime and disease to the U.S., that they are dangerous threats, that they refuse to speak English or to ‘assimilate,’ that they take jobs away from natives, etc.” A 2007 study by Mr. Rumbaut and Mr. Ewing also showed most immigrants are law-abiding. as did a study published around the same time by Robert J. Sampson, a Harvard sociologist, which showed in an inverse relationship between immigration and crime, a pattern that Mr. Sampson said “upends popular stereotypes.”
A similar study published around the same time by Robert J. Sampson, a Harvard sociologist, showed that in the 1990s, when immigration to the United States rose by more than 50 percent, the national homicide rate plunged to levels not seen since the 1960s, a pattern that “upends popular stereotypes.” Both studies came out as the United States was embroiled in an angry, politically charged debate about immigration reform, further aggravated by the execution-style killings of three teenagers in Newark that law enforcement officials attributed to illegal immigrants.
Both of those studies came out as the United States was embroiled in an angry, politically charged debate about immigration reform, further aggravated by the execution-style killings of three teenagers in Newark that law enforcement officials attributed to illegal immigrants. Then, as now in parts of Europe, many American politicians railed against illegal immigrants. Among the best-remembered episodes was a 2007 visit to Newark by Representative Tom Tancredo, a Colorado Republican presidential contender and ardent immigration opponent, who paradoxically, was the grandchild of Italian immigrants.
Then, as now in parts of Europe, many American politicians railed against illegal immigrants. Among the best-remembered episodes was a 2007 visit to Newark by Representative Tom Tancredo, a Colorado Republican presidential contender and ardent immigration opponent, who paradoxically was the grandchild of Italian immigrants. Mr. Tancredo was known for having declared that immigration had created “linguistic ghettos where millions of immigrants speak no English while replicating living standards such as those found in Haiti.”
Among other assertions, Mr. Tancredo was known for having declared that immigration had created “linguistic ghettos where millions of immigrants speak no English while replicating living standards such as those found in Haiti.”
Mr. Tancredo’s critics are fond of pointing out the echoes expressed in 1891 by Representative Henry Cabot Lodge, a Massachusetts Republican, during a wave of arrivals from Russia, Poland and Italy — including Mr. Tancredo’s grandparents.Mr. Tancredo’s critics are fond of pointing out the echoes expressed in 1891 by Representative Henry Cabot Lodge, a Massachusetts Republican, during a wave of arrivals from Russia, Poland and Italy — including Mr. Tancredo’s grandparents.
Mr. Lodge, who many years later helped prevent the United States from joining the League of Nations, was reported to have said that immigration “is making its greatest relative increase from races most alien to the body of the American people and from the lowest and most illiterate classes among those races.”