This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cumbria-35294616
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Carlisle council £125,000 consultant spend 'not justified' | Carlisle council £125,000 consultant spend 'not justified' |
(about 9 hours later) | |
A council in one of the areas worst-hit by recent flooding has halted plans to spend £125,000 on consultants' fees amid concerns the "extremely large amount of money" was not justified. | A council in one of the areas worst-hit by recent flooding has halted plans to spend £125,000 on consultants' fees amid concerns the "extremely large amount of money" was not justified. |
Carlisle City Council's executive approved the money for "specialist support" in retendering its leisure services contract. | Carlisle City Council's executive approved the money for "specialist support" in retendering its leisure services contract. |
The authority's scrutiny panel said it had "very little information" about the decision, which it will discuss later. | The authority's scrutiny panel said it had "very little information" about the decision, which it will discuss later. |
The council declined to comment. | The council declined to comment. |
Referring to recent floods in the county, one of three Conservative councillors who objected to the payment, James Bainbridge, said: "[If], while you were flooded out and you were having a hell of time, you learned that your council has spent £125,000 on a consultant, I think you'd be wanting a few answers." | Referring to recent floods in the county, one of three Conservative councillors who objected to the payment, James Bainbridge, said: "[If], while you were flooded out and you were having a hell of time, you learned that your council has spent £125,000 on a consultant, I think you'd be wanting a few answers." |
'Slimming down' | 'Slimming down' |
Scrutiny panel Conservative member Gareth Ellis said he and colleagues had been given "no breakdown whatsoever" of how the figure had been arrived at. | |
"It's an organisation that's massively slimming down in what it does and then, to blow £125,000 on consultants' fees, we've got to look more carefully at how we manage the council," he said. | "It's an organisation that's massively slimming down in what it does and then, to blow £125,000 on consultants' fees, we've got to look more carefully at how we manage the council," he said. |
The Labour-run council is looking to make savings of £1.2m this year and more than £4m over the next four years, out of an annual budget of £13m. | The Labour-run council is looking to make savings of £1.2m this year and more than £4m over the next four years, out of an annual budget of £13m. |
Scrutiny panel members will decide whether to refer the decision to the full council or ask the executive to reconsider. | Scrutiny panel members will decide whether to refer the decision to the full council or ask the executive to reconsider. |
It could accept the payment if given "a good reason", Mr Ellis said. | It could accept the payment if given "a good reason", Mr Ellis said. |
The current leisure services contract is held by Carlisle Leisure - which has merged with Greenwich Leisure - and is due to expire in November 2017. | The current leisure services contract is held by Carlisle Leisure - which has merged with Greenwich Leisure - and is due to expire in November 2017. |
Previous version
1
Next version