This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/iaea-japan-nuclear-regulation-should-improve-skills-law/2016/01/22/ee513668-c0c9-11e5-98c8-7fab78677d51_story.html

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
IAEA: Japan nuclear regulation should improve skills, law IAEA: Japan nuclear regulation should improve skills, law
(about 5 hours later)
TOKYO — Japan’s nuclear safety regulation has improved since the 2011 Fukushima disaster, but it still needs to strengthen inspections and staff competency, a team of experts from the International Atomic Energy Agency said. TOKYO — Japan has improved its nuclear safety regulation since the 2011 Fukushima disaster, but it still needs to strengthen inspections and staff competency, a team of experts from the International Atomic Energy Agency said Friday.
It was the first IAEA review for the authority since it was established in 2012. Japan adopted stricter safety requirements for plant operators, but the law stipulating on-site inspections remained unchanged. It was the first IAEA review for Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority since it was established in 2012. Japan adopted stricter safety requirements for plant operators, but a law regulating on-site inspections remained mostly unchanged.
The 17-member team, which concluded a 12-day inspection that included the wrecked Fukushima plant, said Friday that Japan’s regulatory body demonstrated independence and transparency — crucial elements lacking before the disaster, when a separate agency was in charge. The 17-member team, which concluded a 12-day inspection that included the wrecked Fukushima plant, said the Nuclear Regulation Authority demonstrated independence and transparency — crucial elements lacking before the disaster, when an earlier agency was in charge.
The Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant was hit by a massive earthquake and tsunami on in March 2011, triggering triple meltdowns. The Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant was hit by a massive earthquake and tsunami in March 2011, triggering triple meltdowns. Government, parliamentary and private investigations have blamed complacency about safety, inadequate crisis management skills, a failure to keep up with international safety standards, and collusion between regulators and the nuclear industry.
The inspection team urged the Nuclear Regulation Authority to enhance inspection competence and for Japan’s government to amend its nuclear safety law to make on-site safety checks more effective and flexible. The IAEA inspection team urged the Nuclear Regulation Authority to enhance inspection competence and the government to amend its nuclear safety law to make on-site safety checks more effective and flexible.
Mission leader Philippe Jamet, a French regulatory commissioner, said Japan’s stiff inspection rules do not allow inspectors to move freely at nuclear facilities or respond quickly when there was a problem. Mission leader Philippe Jamet, a French regulatory commissioner, said Japan’s inflexible inspection rules do not allow inspectors to move freely at nuclear facilities or respond quickly when there is a problem.
“At any time and for any plant, inspectors should be allowed to go where they want. And there is a comprehensive framework for Japan but it doesn’t give any, it doesn’t give enough freedom for the inspectors to react immediately and to provide results,” he told a news conference. “What we found is that the system that is regulating, that is defining the framework of inspection is very complex and very rigid,” Jamet said at a news conference.
He also said inspectors need to keep distance from the utilities. Japan has a comprehensive framework but “it doesn’t give enough freedom for the inspectors to react immediately and to provide results,” he said. “At any time and for any plant, inspectors should be allowed to go where they want.”
A final report by the team is expected in about three months.A final report by the team is expected in about three months.
Japan’s top nuclear commissioner, Shunichi Tanaka, acknowledged the shortcomings and said, “We have to focus on tackling the challenges of inspection system and human resources.”
Masakazu Shima, a Japanese regulator who assisted the inspection team, said the inspection issue was also raised by an earlier IAEA mission in 2007 but Japan never took action.
___
Follow Mari Yamaguchi on Twitter at twitter.com/mariyamaguchi
Her work can be found at http://bigstory.ap.org/content/mari-yamaguchi
Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.