This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35405880

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Emergency services 'should share control rooms' Emergency services 'should share control rooms'
(about 11 hours later)
Police, fire and ambulance services in England should share control rooms to improve their response to 999 calls, a Home Office minister has said.Police, fire and ambulance services in England should share control rooms to improve their response to 999 calls, a Home Office minister has said.
Mike Penning said it would be better if one operator was able to handle all emergency calls from one control room. Mike Penning said it did not "make sense" to have different premises.
The proposal is part of plans, published on Tuesday, to get the three services working more closely together. It comes as new plans are published to get the services working more closely.
A move to allow police and crime commissioners to oversee local fire brigades is also among the measures. There are also proposals for police and crime commissioners (PCCs) to oversee fire brigades, which could include choosing an officer in charge of hiring and firing fire and police staff.
In most parts of England, the police, fire and ambulance services have separate control centres and when someone rings 999, they have to tell an operator which service they require. This top officer post would be open to senior officers from both the police and fire service. They would hold the rank of chief constable - and to allow this the government would remove the current rule that holders of the rank must have served as a constable.
A few areas in England have already got shared control rooms but the Home Office wants more and is introducing a "statutory duty" on all three services to collaborate. PCCs would get responsibility for fire services "where a local case is made", the Home Office said.
Mr Penning, minister for policing and fire, said it was about "smarter working".
"It simply doesn't make sense for emergency services to have different premises, different back offices and different IT systems when their work is so closely related and they often share the same boundaries," he said.
'Costly experiment''Costly experiment'
Under the plans, consulted on last year, police and crime commissioners (PCCs) will be able to put in place a single "employer", led by a senior officer in charge of hiring all local fire and police personnel. In most parts of England, police, fire and ambulance services have separate control centres and when someone rings 999, they have to tell an operator which service they need.
The post will be reserved for those who hold the rank of chief constable but rules will be changed to allow senior fire officers who have not previously served as a constable to apply. Emergency services in some areas - including Northamptonshire and Hampshire - are already working on joint schemes, but the Home Office wants more and is introducing a "statutory duty" on the three services to collaborate.
The proposal was called "dangerous" by the Fire Brigades Union (FBU) when it was suggested last year. In Northamptonshire, police, fire and ambulance services are sharing "training, premises and a joint operations", the Home Office said. In Hampshire, senior police officers now operate out of the Hampshire Fire and Rescue HQ.
An FBU spokesman said: "It is still our professional opinion that the plans to have PCCs take over responsibility for fire and rescues services are a mistake. Mr Penning, minister for policing and fire, said: "It simply doesn't make sense for emergency services to have different premises, different back offices and different IT systems when their work is so closely related and they often share the same boundaries."
"PCC takeover of fire and rescue is a costly experiment with no guarantee for success." He said he would also like PCCs to take responsibility for their local ambulance service, but at this stage the Home Office is only planning to extend PCC powers to fire brigades.
Mr Penning said he would like PCCs to also take on responsibility for their local ambulance service, but at this stage the Home Office is planning to extend the powers of PCCs only to the fire service. 'Sledgehammer' plan
"We believe that better joint working can strengthen the emergency services, deliver significant savings and produce benefits for the public," he said. The plan for PCCs to oversee fire services was called "dangerous" by the Fire Brigades Union (FBU) when it was suggested last year.
"Strong leadership will be required to drive greater efficiencies and improved outcomes. Directly elected police and crime commissioners are clearly accountable to the public and have a strong incentive to pursue ambitious reform and deliver value for money." It said the move would be a "costly experiment with no guarantee for success".
Steve White, chairman of the Police Federation of England and Wales, said: "Officers from both emergency services already do pull together, working alongside week in, week out, as has been evidenced most recently by the appalling floods.Steve White, chairman of the Police Federation of England and Wales, said: "Officers from both emergency services already do pull together, working alongside week in, week out, as has been evidenced most recently by the appalling floods.
"So why the burning need to change the law? It's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.""So why the burning need to change the law? It's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut."
Paul Hancock, Cheshire's Chief Fire Officer and president of the Chief Fire Officers Association, said combining control rooms was "absolutely a good thing".
He said there were "fantastic examples" of emergency services working together across the country, and he welcomed PCCs taking control of fire services when there was a "local case".
But he said there were "some concerns" within the fire service about losing its "unique brand and reputation" due to being associated with the police.
The government's plan also includes abolishing the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority and giving its responsibilities to the Greater London Authority.