This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/us-to-collect-equal-pay-data-from-all-big-employers/2016/01/29/e7e256fa-c645-11e5-b933-31c93021392a_story.html

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Obama targets gender pay gap with plan to collect companies’ salary data Obama targets gender pay gap with plan to collect companies’ salary data
(1 day later)
President Obama proposed a new rule Friday that would require every large company in America to report employees' pay based on race and gender, an effort to reduce longstanding pay inequities for women and minorities. This story has been updated.
The new policy, already drawing criticism from some business leaders, would order companies with at least 100 employees to add salary numbers on a form they already annually submit that reports employees’ sex, age and job groups. The new pay information would alert the EEOC to companies with significant wage disparities, which could result in lawsuits. President Obama laid out new rules Friday that would require every big company to report salaries based on race, gender and ethnicity, setting up the federal government to actively police pay disparities that have resisted other efforts at reform.
Oftentimes, folks are doing the same job and being paid differently," Obama said in a speech at the White House. "The goal is to help businesses who are trying to do the right thing get a clearer picture of how they can ensure their employees are being treated fairly." Armed with that data, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission could target companies accused of paying women less than their male counterparts with investigations and lawsuits. Any lawsuit would cause the company to be publicly named. The same would be true of pay disparities between minorities and whites.
During the updated data collection process, officials would not publicly name employers or employees, said Jenny Yang, chairwoman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which published the proposed rule with the Department of Labor. If disciplinary action is taken, however, companies found to write discriminatory paychecks could appear in public record. The rule does not need congressional approval and is expected to be greenlighted by the Office of Management and Budget.
For instance, if company data shows typical female managers earn, say, 25 percent less than typical male managers, the government may launch an investigation. Obama took swings at reducing pay gaps early in his administration. But the average compensation between men and women has barely budged over the last seven years. Women saw 77 cents for every dollar that men made when Obama came into office. Today, that ratio stands at 79 cents for every dollar earned by men.
Since the White House established its Equal Pay Task Force in 2010, Yang added, the agency has collected from firms more than $85 million in employee-relief checks. "The notion that we would somehow be keeping my daughters … any of your daughters out of opportunity, not allowing them to thrive in any field, not allowing them to fully participate in every human endeavor, that's counterproductive," Obama said.
[On Leadership: The gender wage gap isn%u2019t just unfair. It also ups the odds women get anxiety or depression.][On Leadership: The gender wage gap isn%u2019t just unfair. It also ups the odds women get anxiety or depression.]
The EEOC also intends to turn the aggregated data into an annual salary report, showing the average pay for workers in different sectors and industries across the country, starting next year. The information, Yang said, would help managers assess how they set pay and inform employees during the negotiation process. If the new policy is enacted by its September deadline, the first report would be published a year later. Business groups swiftly condemned Friday's move, blasting the policy as a government overreach into how pay is set in the private sector.
“Pay discrimination goes undetected because of a lack of accurate information about what people are paid,” Yang said at the White House conference. "Collecting this pay data would help fill a critical void we need to ensure American workers receive fair pay for their work." Randy Johnson, senior vice president of Labor, Immigration, and Employee Benefits for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said that, though the organization supports equal pay for equal work, the new rule "would place unnecessary and onerous burdens on employers while providing no meaningful insight."
The proposal expands on Obama's 2014 executive order that required all federal contractors to submit similar salary data by gender and race. The measure also abolished all “gag rules,” which prevented federal contractors from discussing their salaries. Kelly Kolb, a vice president of the Retail Industry Leaders Association, said the information would be difficult to gather and could become "attractive fodder for those intent to mislead."
Civil rights attorney Debbie Katz said the new rule would be more than a symbolic call for wage equality. Workers who take their discrimination cases to the EEOC, she said, would have data to support their claims. Companies would report the salary data on a form they submit annually to the EEOC. On the updated form, employers would have to identify the race and gender of each employee and report their total W-2 earnings for a 12-month period, including tips, taxable benefits and bonuses.
“You’d have a much stronger argument if your company is being reckless with the law and the numbers show that,” she said. Officials would not publicly name employers or employees, said Jenny Yang, chairwoman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which published the proposed rule with the Department of Labor. But if the agency files a discrimination lawsuit as a result of the findings, companies would appear in public record.
[A well-known venture capitalist says we need inequality. What do economists say?][A well-known venture capitalist says we need inequality. What do economists say?]
Detractors, however, say the policy is an unnecessary government overreach. The EEOC intends to publicly release the aggregated data in an annual salary report, showing the average pay for workers in different sectors and industries across the country. The information, Yang said, would help managers assess how they set pay and inform employees during the negotiation process. The EEOC hopes to collect the data by September and publish the first report a year later.
Randy Johnson, senior vice president of Labor, Immigration, and Employee Benefits for the U.S. Chamber, said that, though the organization supports equal pay for equal work, the new rule would place an unnecessary burden on employers while providing no "meaningful insight." "Pay discrimination goes undetected because of a lack of accurate information about what people are paid," Yang said at the White House conference. "Collecting this pay data would help fill a critical void we need to ensure American workers receive fair pay for their work."
“Clearly the administration has embarked on one more fishing expedition to support a political agenda divorced from the facts," Johnson said. "Sound bites don’t make sound policy.” Detractors say the policy change would create an unnecessary government overreach. Roughly 67,000 employers would have to take on the extra paperwork.
Proponents of the measure say it will crank up the pressure on companies that wish to appear morally correct. David Cohen, president of DCI Consulting Group, a consulting firm that leads business pay-equity studies, said the proposal is undermined because it will compare pay of workers with vastly different jobs, markets and abilities. The summarized data will be reported across 10 broad job categories --"professionals," for instance, range from doctors and nuclear engineers to social workers -- that could muddle the results.
"If the goal of this report is to raise awareness, that we're the government and we care deeply about this wage gap ... that's great," he said. "If the goal is to use this report as a predictor of discrimination, it will fail."
Civil rights attorney Debbie Katz said the new rule would be more than a symbolic call for wage equality. Workers who take their discrimination cases to the EEOC, she said, would have objective numbers to back them up.
"You'd have a much stronger argument if your company is being reckless with the law and the numbers show that," she said.
Proponents of the measure also say it will crank up the pressure on companies that wish to appear morally correct.
“This is simply designed to improve voluntary pay efforts because they’re not going to want their sheet to look too bad,” said economist Heidi Hartmann, president of the Institute for Women’s Policy Research, an advocacy organization in the District. The proposed policy, she said, would “allow enforcement agencies to look at it, and it will allow researchers to get at it. It’s definite progress.”“This is simply designed to improve voluntary pay efforts because they’re not going to want their sheet to look too bad,” said economist Heidi Hartmann, president of the Institute for Women’s Policy Research, an advocacy organization in the District. The proposed policy, she said, would “allow enforcement agencies to look at it, and it will allow researchers to get at it. It’s definite progress.”
Federal law has prohibited pay discrimination since 1963. But in the United States, women on average earn 79 cents for every dollar paid to men. The gap widens by race, with black women earning 60 cents and Hispanic earning 55 cents to every white man’s buck. The EEOC recorded 26,027 sex-based charges and 21,073 race-based charges in 2014, the most recent year statistics are available.
Economists say the disparities stem from a complicated blend of social forces. Women, for example, concentrate in low-paying jobs, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, while male-dominated fields, like finance and technology, tend to pay more. Mothers also tend more time off work than fathers to care for children, delaying professional growth and promotion opportunities. Since the White House established its Equal Pay Task Force in 2010, Yang added, the agency has collected from firms more than $85 million in employee-relief checks.
Federal law has prohibited pay discrimination since 1963. But in the United States, women on average earn 79 cents for every dollar paid to men. The gap widens by race, with black women earning 60 cents and Hispanic earning 55 cents to every white man's buck.
Economists say the disparities stem from a complicated blend of social forces. Women, for example, concentrate in low-paying jobs, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, while male-dominated fields, like finance and technology, tend to pay more. Mothers also tend to take more time off work than fathers to care for children, delaying professional growth and promotion opportunities.
Discrimination, though, may drive a significant chunk of the wage gap, said Francine Blau, a Cornell University economist who studies the phenomenon. In a study released this month, Blau and her colleagues used national data that includes labor market experience to break down the 79-cent figure.Discrimination, though, may drive a significant chunk of the wage gap, said Francine Blau, a Cornell University economist who studies the phenomenon. In a study released this month, Blau and her colleagues used national data that includes labor market experience to break down the 79-cent figure.
A woman’s career decisions, they found, represent only half the gap. Industry choice accounts for 17.6 percent, occupation choice makes up 32.9 percent and region drives 3 percent. Thirty-eight percent, she said, is left “unexplained." A woman's career decisions, they found, represent about half the gap. Industry choice accounts for 17.6 percent, occupation choice makes up 32.9 percent and region drives 3 percent. Thirty-eight percent, she said, is left "unexplained."
“Discrimination is not necessarily overt or conscious,” Blau said. “It could be subtle. People have stereotypes about males and females, and they can creep in during hiring or promotion decisions.” "Discrimination is not necessarily overt or conscious," Blau said. "It could be subtle. People have stereotypes about males and females, and they can creep in during hiring or promotion decisions."
Gathering and reporting who makes what at a company could inspire employers to fix uneven work environments, said Secretary of Labor Thomas Perez. Bosses in corner offices may not be aware that men in their company may make, say, 20 percent more than their female counterparts.
“When you’re looking at your data, it’s going to force you to confront your reality,” said Perez said at the White House announcement. “Leadership is the willingness to look at yourself at the mirror and say were not perfect."