This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-35456219

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Barclays to pay $70m US dark pool trading fine Barclays and Credit Suisse are fined over US 'dark pools'
(about 1 hour later)
Barclays is set to be fined $70m (£49m) for misleading investors about its US "dark pool" trading operations, says the New York Attorney General's office. Barclays and Credit Suisse have been fined a total of $154m (£108m) by US regulators for their US "dark pool" trading operations.
The UK-based bank has been accused of not making it clear to its clients that particularly aggressive traders, known as high-frequency traders, were using the private platform. "Dark pool" operations allow investors to trade large blocks of shares but keep the prices private.
"Dark pool" trading operations allow investors to trade large blocks of shares but keep the price private. Barclays has admitted misleading investors and violating securities law in the way it operated the poll. It will pay a $70m fine.
The bank declined to comment. Credit Suisse will pay $60m and another $24.3m relating to other violations.
A formal announcement, including a settlement with Credit Suisse also over dark pool trading, is expected on Monday from the New York Attorney General (NYAG) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The fines will be split between the State of New York and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
As well as the fine, Barclays is expected to admit to having broken the law and will agree to install an independent monitor to conduct a review of its electronic trading business, according to the NYAG. The New York Attorney General and the SEC have both censured the two banks for their misconduct.
'Significant role''Significant role'
Credit Suisse is likely to pay a penalty of $84.3m but will neither admit or deny any wrongdoing.
"These cases mark the first major victory in the fight against fraud in dark pool trading that began when we first sued Barclays," said Eric Schneiderman, the New York attorney general."These cases mark the first major victory in the fight against fraud in dark pool trading that began when we first sued Barclays," said Eric Schneiderman, the New York attorney general.
He added that "co-ordinated and aggressive government action" had led to "admissions of wrongdoing, and meaningful reforms to protect investors from predatory, high-frequency traders".He added that "co-ordinated and aggressive government action" had led to "admissions of wrongdoing, and meaningful reforms to protect investors from predatory, high-frequency traders".
"We will continue to take the fight to those who aim to rig the system and those who look the other way.""We will continue to take the fight to those who aim to rig the system and those who look the other way."
Meanwhile Andrew Ceresney, director of the SEC's enforcement division said: "Dark pools have a significant role in today's equity marketplace, and the firms that run these venues must ensure that they do not make misstatements to subscribers about their material operations.'' Meanwhile Andrew Ceresney, director of the SEC's enforcement division said: "Dark pools have a significant role in today's equity marketplace, and the firms that run these venues must ensure that they do not make mis-statements to subscribers about their material operations.''
Barclays lost an attempt to have the case dismissed last year. Last year Barclays lost an attempt to have the case dismissed.