This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/feb/02/philip-hammond-rules-out-sending-british-combat-troops-libya
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Philip Hammond rules out sending British combat troops to Libya | Philip Hammond rules out sending British combat troops to Libya |
| (35 minutes later) | |
| The British foreign secretary, Philip Hammond, has ruled out sending combat troops to Libya to tackle the spread of Islamic State. | The British foreign secretary, Philip Hammond, has ruled out sending combat troops to Libya to tackle the spread of Islamic State. |
| Speaking at a one-day meeting to discuss anti-Isis strategy in Rome on Tuesday, Hammond said the UK could provide support in other ways, primarily by providing intelligence gathered from the air, offering advice and helping with military organisation. | Speaking at a one-day meeting to discuss anti-Isis strategy in Rome on Tuesday, Hammond said the UK could provide support in other ways, primarily by providing intelligence gathered from the air, offering advice and helping with military organisation. |
| “We will certainly want to support the new Libyan government in any practical way we can but I don’t envisage that there will be a situation where we need or want to put combat troop boots on the ground,” he said. | “We will certainly want to support the new Libyan government in any practical way we can but I don’t envisage that there will be a situation where we need or want to put combat troop boots on the ground,” he said. |
| “I don’t think we are likely to think that putting combat troops on the ground is a helpful contribution. There are plenty of armed men in Libya. What they need is organisation, command and control, air-gathered intelligence, strategic organisation.” | “I don’t think we are likely to think that putting combat troops on the ground is a helpful contribution. There are plenty of armed men in Libya. What they need is organisation, command and control, air-gathered intelligence, strategic organisation.” |
| Related: Is America about to sleepwalk into a war in Libya? We need a debate now | Trevor Timm | Related: Is America about to sleepwalk into a war in Libya? We need a debate now | Trevor Timm |
| The Italian government is taking the lead in drawing up a plan to support a new Libyan government and 23 countries took part in the Rome meeting. | |
| One option is to send a 6,000-strong Italian-led force to help with training and organisation of a new Libyan army. Rome has asked the UK to provide up to 1,000 troops, though only in a training and advisory role. | One option is to send a 6,000-strong Italian-led force to help with training and organisation of a new Libyan army. Rome has asked the UK to provide up to 1,000 troops, though only in a training and advisory role. |
| But discussions are still at an early stage and such an intervention is only one of more than a dozen options under consideration. The UK has sent a small team to Libya to examine the feasibility of deploying such a force. | But discussions are still at an early stage and such an intervention is only one of more than a dozen options under consideration. The UK has sent a small team to Libya to examine the feasibility of deploying such a force. |
| If the UK was just to send troops in a training and advisory role, they would need combat troops to protect them. Any international force would be a magnet for jihadi groups in Libya. | |
| The UK has about 150 troops operating on the ground in Iraq, both in Baghdad and Kurdistan, primarily providing training and advice. | The UK has about 150 troops operating on the ground in Iraq, both in Baghdad and Kurdistan, primarily providing training and advice. |