This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-35482666
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Elliott: almost £50k damages over defamatory Flanagan tweet | Elliott: almost £50k damages over defamatory Flanagan tweet |
(35 minutes later) | |
The High Court in Belfast has awarded almost £50k in damages to a former Ulster Unionist leader over a defamatory message posted on Twitter. | The High Court in Belfast has awarded almost £50k in damages to a former Ulster Unionist leader over a defamatory message posted on Twitter. |
Mr Justice Stephens awarded Tom Elliott £48,750 compensation following a tweet by Sinn Féin's Phil Flanagan. | Mr Justice Stephens awarded Tom Elliott £48,750 compensation following a tweet by Sinn Féin's Phil Flanagan. |
The Fermanagh MLA posted the message after Mr Elliott appeared on a BBC radio programme in May 2014. | The Fermanagh MLA posted the message after Mr Elliott appeared on a BBC radio programme in May 2014. |
Mr Elliott served in the UDR for 10 years, between 1982 and 1992. He is now the MP for Fermanagh and South Tyrone. | Mr Elliott served in the UDR for 10 years, between 1982 and 1992. He is now the MP for Fermanagh and South Tyrone. |
The tweet was taken down from Mr Flanagan's Twitter account within an hour being posted. | The tweet was taken down from Mr Flanagan's Twitter account within an hour being posted. |
However, Mr Elliot said that, despite the tweet being removed, it remained accessible on the internet, social media sites and political blogs. | However, Mr Elliot said that, despite the tweet being removed, it remained accessible on the internet, social media sites and political blogs. |
On Wednesday, Mr Justice Stephens said the tweet constituted a "serious libel", which was "grossly defamatory". | On Wednesday, Mr Justice Stephens said the tweet constituted a "serious libel", which was "grossly defamatory". |