This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/apr/28/texas-calls-off-robert-pruett-execution-hours

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Texas calls off Robert Pruett execution with just hours to spare Texas calls off Robert Pruett execution with just hours to spare
(7 months later)
The planned execution of Robert Pruett has been stayed to allow for more testing of evidence, about three hours before the Texas prisoner was scheduled to be given a lethal injection for the murder of a guard in 1999.The planned execution of Robert Pruett has been stayed to allow for more testing of evidence, about three hours before the Texas prisoner was scheduled to be given a lethal injection for the murder of a guard in 1999.
Pruett, 35, was convicted in 2002 of killing of Daniel Nagle, a 37-year-old corrections officer who was stabbed to death in his office at a prison near Corpus Christi.Pruett, 35, was convicted in 2002 of killing of Daniel Nagle, a 37-year-old corrections officer who was stabbed to death in his office at a prison near Corpus Christi.
Related: Living on death row in Tennessee: 'The rollercoaster is exhausting'
The prosecution argued that Pruett murdered Nagle in retaliation for being punished for eating a packed lunch in an unauthorised area. The disciplinary report was found torn up by the guard’s body.The prosecution argued that Pruett murdered Nagle in retaliation for being punished for eating a packed lunch in an unauthorised area. The disciplinary report was found torn up by the guard’s body.
Blood on the report was tested for DNA, which was found to have come from Nagle. More DNA testing was conducted in 2013, and the results were inconclusive.Blood on the report was tested for DNA, which was found to have come from Nagle. More DNA testing was conducted in 2013, and the results were inconclusive.
Pruett’s attorneys argued that the evidence had been damaged by being improperly stored but future, more advanced DNA testing techniques might reveal more details that would allow him to prove his innocence and potentially identify the true perpetrator.Pruett’s attorneys argued that the evidence had been damaged by being improperly stored but future, more advanced DNA testing techniques might reveal more details that would allow him to prove his innocence and potentially identify the true perpetrator.
On Tuesday afternoon a judge agreed to halt the execution, scheduled for 6pm local time, to allow for more DNA testing of evidence.On Tuesday afternoon a judge agreed to halt the execution, scheduled for 6pm local time, to allow for more DNA testing of evidence.
David Dow, Pruett’s attorney, said that Bert Richardson, who is now on the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals but has previously issued rulings on the case as a district judge, withdrew the execution date to allow for more testing of evidence including the murder weapon – a sharpened metal shank with a piece of tape used as a handle – using currently available technology.David Dow, Pruett’s attorney, said that Bert Richardson, who is now on the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals but has previously issued rulings on the case as a district judge, withdrew the execution date to allow for more testing of evidence including the murder weapon – a sharpened metal shank with a piece of tape used as a handle – using currently available technology.
Pruett claimed that he had been framed by people worried that Nagle was about to expose corruption in the facility. There was no physical evidence linking him to the crime and the prosecution’s case was based mainly on testimony from other inmates, some of whom were given favourable treatment as a result.Pruett claimed that he had been framed by people worried that Nagle was about to expose corruption in the facility. There was no physical evidence linking him to the crime and the prosecution’s case was based mainly on testimony from other inmates, some of whom were given favourable treatment as a result.
Pruett has come close to death several times before only for stays to be granted. At the time of the killing he was serving a 99-year sentence for being an accomplice, aged 15, in a murder carried out by his father.Pruett has come close to death several times before only for stays to be granted. At the time of the killing he was serving a 99-year sentence for being an accomplice, aged 15, in a murder carried out by his father.
An appeal was rejected by the federal fifth circuit court last Friday, but Pruett had several appeals pending, including at the US supreme court.An appeal was rejected by the federal fifth circuit court last Friday, but Pruett had several appeals pending, including at the US supreme court.