This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/africa/south-african-court-hears-case-against-president/2016/02/09/18fd48da-cf0b-11e5-90d3-34c2c42653ac_story.html

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
South African court hears case against president South African court hears case against president
(about 1 hour later)
JOHANNESBURG — South Africa’s highest court is hearing a case against President Jacob Zuma, who is accused of violating the constitution in a scandal over state spending on his private home. JOHANNESBURG — South Africa’s highest court on Tuesday heard a case against President Jacob Zuma, who is accused of violating the constitution in a scandal over state spending on his private home.
Opposition parties brought the case against Zuma to the Constitutional Court, whose proceedings were being shown on live television Tuesday. Opposition parties brought the case against Zuma to the Constitutional Court, whose proceedings in a packed, brick-lined chamber were shown on live television. Opposition protesters marched to the courthouse as the robed judges inside considered whether the president broke the law by failing to follow a 2014 recommendation from the state watchdog agency that he pay back some of the more than $20 million in home upgrades.
The parties say Zuma was required to follow a 2014 recommendation from the state watchdog agency that he pay back some of the more than $20 million in home upgrades. “He didn’t do what the constitution required him to do,” said Wim Trengrove, a lawyer for the opposition.
On Feb. 3, Zuma’s office said he was willing to reimburse some money. His critics say he wanted to avoid the embarrassment of a court hearing about his conduct. On Feb. 3, Zuma’s office said he was willing to reimburse some money. His critics said he was trying to avoid the embarrassment of a court hearing about his conduct.
The Constitutional Court was expected to clarify whether recommendations made by the Public Protector’s office, which scrutinizes state officials and institutions, are binding.
Zuma’s presidency did not appear to be under immediate threat. Parliament has the power to remove him, but the ruling African National Congress party has a comfortable majority and has been supportive of his stance in the scandal over his private compound, known as Nkandla.
___
Follow Christopher Torchia on Twitter at www.twitter.com/torchiachris
Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.