This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/10/world/asia/google-alphago-lee-se-dol.html
The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 2 | Version 3 |
|---|---|
| Master of Go Board Game Is Walloped by Google Computer Program | |
| (about 2 hours later) | |
| SEOUL, South Korea — Computer, one. Human, zero. | SEOUL, South Korea — Computer, one. Human, zero. |
| A Google computer program trounced one of the world’s top players on Wednesday in a round of Go, which is believed to be the most complex board game ever created. | A Google computer program trounced one of the world’s top players on Wednesday in a round of Go, which is believed to be the most complex board game ever created. |
| The match — between Google DeepMind’s AlphaGo and the South Korean Go master Lee Se-dol —was viewed as an important test of how far research into artificial intelligence has come in its quest to create machines smarter than humans. | The match — between Google DeepMind’s AlphaGo and the South Korean Go master Lee Se-dol —was viewed as an important test of how far research into artificial intelligence has come in its quest to create machines smarter than humans. |
| “I am very surprised because I have never thought I would lose,” Mr. Lee said at a news conference in Seoul, South Korea. “I didn’t know that AlphaGo would play such a perfect Go.” | “I am very surprised because I have never thought I would lose,” Mr. Lee said at a news conference in Seoul, South Korea. “I didn’t know that AlphaGo would play such a perfect Go.” |
| Mr. Lee acknowledged defeat after three and a half hours of play. | Mr. Lee acknowledged defeat after three and a half hours of play. |
| Demis Hassabis, the founder and chief executive of Google’s artificial intelligence team DeepMind, the creator of AlphaGo, called the program’s victory a “historic moment.” | Demis Hassabis, the founder and chief executive of Google’s artificial intelligence team DeepMind, the creator of AlphaGo, called the program’s victory a “historic moment.” |
| The match, the first of five scheduled through Tuesday, took place at a Seoul hotel amid intense news media attention. Hundreds of reporters, many of them from China, Japan and South Korea, where Go has been played for centuries, were there to cover it. Tens of thousands of people watched the contest live on YouTube. | The match, the first of five scheduled through Tuesday, took place at a Seoul hotel amid intense news media attention. Hundreds of reporters, many of them from China, Japan and South Korea, where Go has been played for centuries, were there to cover it. Tens of thousands of people watched the contest live on YouTube. |
| Go is a two-player game of strategy said to have originated in China 3,000 years ago. Players compete to win more territory by placing black and white “stones” on a grid measuring 19 squares by 19 squares. | Go is a two-player game of strategy said to have originated in China 3,000 years ago. Players compete to win more territory by placing black and white “stones” on a grid measuring 19 squares by 19 squares. |
| The play is more complex than chess, with a far greater possible sequence of moves, which had led many researchers to predict that mastery of the game by a computer was still a decade away. | The play is more complex than chess, with a far greater possible sequence of moves, which had led many researchers to predict that mastery of the game by a computer was still a decade away. |
| To researchers who have been using games as platforms for testing artificial intelligence, Go has remained the great challenge since the I.B.M.-developed supercomputer Deep Blue beat the world chess champion Garry Kasparov in 1997. | To researchers who have been using games as platforms for testing artificial intelligence, Go has remained the great challenge since the I.B.M.-developed supercomputer Deep Blue beat the world chess champion Garry Kasparov in 1997. |
| “Really, the only game left after chess is Go,” Mr. Hassabis said on Wednesday. | “Really, the only game left after chess is Go,” Mr. Hassabis said on Wednesday. |
| AlphaGo made news when it routed the three-time European Go champion Fan Hui in October, 5-0. | AlphaGo made news when it routed the three-time European Go champion Fan Hui in October, 5-0. |
| But Mr. Lee, 33, is one of the world’s most accomplished professional Go players, with 18 international titles under his belt. He has called the European champion’s level in Go “near the top among amateurs.” | But Mr. Lee, 33, is one of the world’s most accomplished professional Go players, with 18 international titles under his belt. He has called the European champion’s level in Go “near the top among amateurs.” |
| AlphaGo has become much stronger since its matches with Mr. Fan, its developers said. It challenged Mr. Lee because it was ready to take on someone “iconic,” “a legend of the game,” Mr. Hassabis said. Google offered Mr. Lee $1 million if he wins the best-of-five series. | AlphaGo has become much stronger since its matches with Mr. Fan, its developers said. It challenged Mr. Lee because it was ready to take on someone “iconic,” “a legend of the game,” Mr. Hassabis said. Google offered Mr. Lee $1 million if he wins the best-of-five series. |
| Mr. Hassabis said AlphaGo does not try to consider all the possible moves in a match, as a traditional artificial intelligence machine like Deep Blue does. Rather, it narrows its options based on what it has learned from millions of matches played against itself and in 100,000 Go games available online. | Mr. Hassabis said AlphaGo does not try to consider all the possible moves in a match, as a traditional artificial intelligence machine like Deep Blue does. Rather, it narrows its options based on what it has learned from millions of matches played against itself and in 100,000 Go games available online. |
| Before the first match, Mr. Lee had said he could win 5-0 or 4-1, predicting that computing power alone could not win a Go match. Victory takes “human intuition,” something AlphaGo has not yet mastered, he said. | Before the first match, Mr. Lee had said he could win 5-0 or 4-1, predicting that computing power alone could not win a Go match. Victory takes “human intuition,” something AlphaGo has not yet mastered, he said. |
| But after reading more about AlphaGo, he became less upbeat, saying that AlphaGo appeared able to imitate human intuition to a certain degree and predicting that artificial intelligence would eventually surpass humans in Go. | But after reading more about AlphaGo, he became less upbeat, saying that AlphaGo appeared able to imitate human intuition to a certain degree and predicting that artificial intelligence would eventually surpass humans in Go. |
| AlphaGo posed Mr. Lee a unique challenge. In a human-versus-human Go match, which typically lasts several hours, the players “feel” each other and evaluate styles and psychologies, he said. | AlphaGo posed Mr. Lee a unique challenge. In a human-versus-human Go match, which typically lasts several hours, the players “feel” each other and evaluate styles and psychologies, he said. |
| “This time, it’s like playing the game alone,” Mr. Lee said on the eve of the match. “There are mistakes humans make because they are humans. If that happens to me, I can lose a match.” | “This time, it’s like playing the game alone,” Mr. Lee said on the eve of the match. “There are mistakes humans make because they are humans. If that happens to me, I can lose a match.” |
| Mr. Hassabis said that a central advantage of AlphaGo was that “it will never get tired, and it will not get intimidated either.” | Mr. Hassabis said that a central advantage of AlphaGo was that “it will never get tired, and it will not get intimidated either.” |
| Kim Sung-ryong, a South Korean Go master who provided commentary during Wednesday’s match, said AlphaGo had made a clear mistake early on, but that unlike most human players, it did not lose its “cool.” | Kim Sung-ryong, a South Korean Go master who provided commentary during Wednesday’s match, said AlphaGo had made a clear mistake early on, but that unlike most human players, it did not lose its “cool.” |
| “It didn’t play Go as a human does,” he said. “It was a Go match with human emotional elements carved out.” | “It didn’t play Go as a human does,” he said. “It was a Go match with human emotional elements carved out.” |
| Mr. Lee said he knew he had lost the match after AlphaGo made a move so unexpected and unconventional that he thought “it was impossible to make such a move.” | Mr. Lee said he knew he had lost the match after AlphaGo made a move so unexpected and unconventional that he thought “it was impossible to make such a move.” |
| Mr. Lee said he now thought his chances for victory in the five-match series were 50-50. | Mr. Lee said he now thought his chances for victory in the five-match series were 50-50. |