This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/we-desperately-need-more-women-judges-so-why-we-arent-getting-them/2016/03/10/9c8f0c9c-e6df-11e5-a6f3-21ccdbc5f74e_story.html

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
We desperately need more women judges, so why we aren’t getting them? We desperately need more women judges, so why aren’t we getting them?
(35 minutes later)
In early Egypt, in ancient Rome, in Renaissance Europe and outside most 21st century American courthouses, justice has been represented by that woman with a sword, scales and blindfold. You know her, right? Lady Justice.In early Egypt, in ancient Rome, in Renaissance Europe and outside most 21st century American courthouses, justice has been represented by that woman with a sword, scales and blindfold. You know her, right? Lady Justice.
But funny how inside the courtrooms? There are not many Lady Justices to be found.But funny how inside the courtrooms? There are not many Lady Justices to be found.
The majority of this country’s population is represented by only three female justices on the nine-member U.S. Supreme Court. Activists are pressing President Obama to nominate a women of color to replace Justice Antonin Scalia, who died suddenly last month. But Senate Republicans — overwhelmingly male — have vowed to block any nominee, of any gender, color or qualification. Nice, right?The majority of this country’s population is represented by only three female justices on the nine-member U.S. Supreme Court. Activists are pressing President Obama to nominate a women of color to replace Justice Antonin Scalia, who died suddenly last month. But Senate Republicans — overwhelmingly male — have vowed to block any nominee, of any gender, color or qualification. Nice, right?
The Supreme Court’s gender diversity is actually a little better than a lot of benches. In the highest state courts across the country, only 29 percent of judges are women, according to the National Association for Women Judges.The Supreme Court’s gender diversity is actually a little better than a lot of benches. In the highest state courts across the country, only 29 percent of judges are women, according to the National Association for Women Judges.
Is this because we simply don’t have women qualified for judicial appointments? Of course not.Is this because we simply don’t have women qualified for judicial appointments? Of course not.
Take the example in Virginia. The cartoonish resistance to female judges played out there yet again this week, when Republicans finally won an ugly partisan battle to dump a non-partisan, high quality female judge for the state Supreme Court.Take the example in Virginia. The cartoonish resistance to female judges played out there yet again this week, when Republicans finally won an ugly partisan battle to dump a non-partisan, high quality female judge for the state Supreme Court.
[GOP wins long Virginia Supreme Court fight with McAuliffe ][GOP wins long Virginia Supreme Court fight with McAuliffe ]
Justice Jane Marum Roush, who deftly presided over the Beltway sniper trial, had a distinguished 22-year judicial record in Fairfax County. She came recommended by a Republican.Justice Jane Marum Roush, who deftly presided over the Beltway sniper trial, had a distinguished 22-year judicial record in Fairfax County. She came recommended by a Republican.
Gov. Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) appointed Roush to a seat on the Virginia Supreme Court that opened while the legislature was out of session last summer. She became the third woman among seven justices. And that should have won McAuliffe praise.Gov. Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) appointed Roush to a seat on the Virginia Supreme Court that opened while the legislature was out of session last summer. She became the third woman among seven justices. And that should have won McAuliffe praise.
Instead it touched off a political firestorm, pitting the governor against Republican members of the House of Delegates Republicans, who refused to make her temporary appointment permanent. No reason given, no interviews done, no formal complaints filed.Instead it touched off a political firestorm, pitting the governor against Republican members of the House of Delegates Republicans, who refused to make her temporary appointment permanent. No reason given, no interviews done, no formal complaints filed.
At first, it looked like this might just be partisan politics, a sucker-punch to McAuliffe. If he wanted her, the Republicans didn’t .At first, it looked like this might just be partisan politics, a sucker-punch to McAuliffe. If he wanted her, the Republicans didn’t .
But throughout the political showdown, it’s been raining men in Virginia, a parade of male candidates for the job, not a female candidate in sight.But throughout the political showdown, it’s been raining men in Virginia, a parade of male candidates for the job, not a female candidate in sight.
They tried to pick their own guy, Court of Appeals Judge Rossie D. Alston Jr. But he didn’t appeal enough to get a passing vote.They tried to pick their own guy, Court of Appeals Judge Rossie D. Alston Jr. But he didn’t appeal enough to get a passing vote.
Then they tried to throw a cherry bomb — former Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli — into the mix. Cuccinelli is one of Virginia’s most polarizing politicians who recently lost the gubernatorial race.Then they tried to throw a cherry bomb — former Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli — into the mix. Cuccinelli is one of Virginia’s most polarizing politicians who recently lost the gubernatorial race.
But Cuccinelli withdrew from the contest Wednesday, after “prayerfully” considering the run.But Cuccinelli withdrew from the contest Wednesday, after “prayerfully” considering the run.
On Thursday, though, the House Republicans handed a 12-year judgeshipStephen R. McCullough, a state Court of Appeals jurist who worked in the Attorney General’s Office under Cuccinelli and breezed through his 20-minute interview on Wednesday.On Thursday, though, the House Republicans handed a 12-year judgeshipStephen R. McCullough, a state Court of Appeals jurist who worked in the Attorney General’s Office under Cuccinelli and breezed through his 20-minute interview on Wednesday.
Yup, 20 minutes.Yup, 20 minutes.
Judge Roush served with an impeccable and impartial record for 22 years, then served on the Supreme Court for nearly a full year. Her opponents never gave a reason to get rid of her.Judge Roush served with an impeccable and impartial record for 22 years, then served on the Supreme Court for nearly a full year. Her opponents never gave a reason to get rid of her.
[Virginia’s GOP male lawmakers are gifted at antagonizing women][Virginia’s GOP male lawmakers are gifted at antagonizing women]
But a 20-minute interview — which was shorter than my son’s preschool interview, shorter than the grilling a candidate for a fast-food job gets — was enough for yet another white male to sit on the state Supreme Court.But a 20-minute interview — which was shorter than my son’s preschool interview, shorter than the grilling a candidate for a fast-food job gets — was enough for yet another white male to sit on the state Supreme Court.
Why all these machinations to keep Roush off the bench?Why all these machinations to keep Roush off the bench?
Because of politics?Because of politics?
Roush was backed by a Republican, so no.Roush was backed by a Republican, so no.
Because of diversity?Because of diversity?
Alston is African-American, so no.Alston is African-American, so no.
Because they didn’t want an activist, unabashedly partisan judge in the mix?Because they didn’t want an activist, unabashedly partisan judge in the mix?
Cucinnelli is vociferous in his politics, and Roush is not, so no.Cucinnelli is vociferous in his politics, and Roush is not, so no.
Because they wanted someone with more courtroom experience?Because they wanted someone with more courtroom experience?
McCullough was just getting out of law school when Roush was serving her fifth year as a Virginia judge, and he didn’t make it onto the bench until 2011, so no.McCullough was just getting out of law school when Roush was serving her fifth year as a Virginia judge, and he didn’t make it onto the bench until 2011, so no.
Is it because Roush is a woman?Is it because Roush is a woman?
Well, unless their real hangup is they simply don’t want people whose last name begins with R, her gender is about all that’s left for them to object to, right?Well, unless their real hangup is they simply don’t want people whose last name begins with R, her gender is about all that’s left for them to object to, right?
“It’s because we’re not in the backrooms yet,” Penny J. White, a law professor at the University of Tennessee at Knoxville told me when Roush was fighting to keep her job last fall. White knows something about this, having served on the Tennessee State Supreme Court. “When those backroom deals are made, it’s mostly men making those decisions.”“It’s because we’re not in the backrooms yet,” Penny J. White, a law professor at the University of Tennessee at Knoxville told me when Roush was fighting to keep her job last fall. White knows something about this, having served on the Tennessee State Supreme Court. “When those backroom deals are made, it’s mostly men making those decisions.”
And some of the same forces are in play as President Obama tries to fill the seat left open by Scalia (R) (Oh, wait, we’re not supposed to place that R behind a judges’ name? Scalia made me forget).And some of the same forces are in play as President Obama tries to fill the seat left open by Scalia (R) (Oh, wait, we’re not supposed to place that R behind a judges’ name? Scalia made me forget).
The Notorious RBG — Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg — has her ideas about what this president and the next president should do.The Notorious RBG — Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg — has her ideas about what this president and the next president should do.
“People ask me sometimes, ‘When do you think it will be enough? When will there be enough women on the court?’ ” she once said in an interview. “And my answer is when there are nine.”“People ask me sometimes, ‘When do you think it will be enough? When will there be enough women on the court?’ ” she once said in an interview. “And my answer is when there are nine.”
Nine?Nine?
Yup. Because until 1981, when Sandra Day O’Connor was appointed by a Republican icon, President Reagan, there had always — ALWAYS — been nine men.Yup. Because until 1981, when Sandra Day O’Connor was appointed by a Republican icon, President Reagan, there had always — ALWAYS — been nine men.
Think about it. For 192 years, nine men had the last, legal word across the land.Think about it. For 192 years, nine men had the last, legal word across the land.
Why not nine women?Why not nine women?
Let’s get started.Let’s get started.
Twitter: @petuladTwitter: @petulad
Read more Petula Dvorak:Read more Petula Dvorak:
The ‘Trump Effect’ is contaminating our kids — and could resonate for years
Police officers are killed dealing with domestic violence and other problems we ignore
How abortion opponents secretly bought a Va. abortion clinic to deceive women
Our 10-year-old decided to give ice hockey a try. What we encountered was dreadful.