This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/mar/10/republican-debate-sounded-reasonable-that-doesnt-mean-it-was
The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| The Republican debate sounded reasonable. That doesn't mean it was | The Republican debate sounded reasonable. That doesn't mean it was |
| (35 minutes later) | |
| Just because it’s quieter doesn’t make it any smarter. | Just because it’s quieter doesn’t make it any smarter. |
| Related: Black protester detained after being sucker-punched at Trump rally | |
| Thursday night’s Republican presidential debate in Miami – one of what physics tells us could theoretically be millions – was a subdued affair, especially compared to the flailing, hair-pulling, spitball-shooting daycare fight of last week. But the best thing you can say about it is that a controlled and even-toned insane statement can be just as menacing and just as insane. | |
| The immediate concern for the other Republican candidates is that the beast seems to be learning. Donald Trump’s opening statement actually sounded as if it had been prepared and considered, a disciplined departure from his previous free associations about winning, doing the opposite of not-winning, then getting sick of it. Now that the finish line is in sight, the raw, ravening animal that is the spirit of the Trump campaign appears willing to play at looking tame if it will snooker more squares on the way to the ballot box. | The immediate concern for the other Republican candidates is that the beast seems to be learning. Donald Trump’s opening statement actually sounded as if it had been prepared and considered, a disciplined departure from his previous free associations about winning, doing the opposite of not-winning, then getting sick of it. Now that the finish line is in sight, the raw, ravening animal that is the spirit of the Trump campaign appears willing to play at looking tame if it will snooker more squares on the way to the ballot box. |
| It doesn’t mean it’s any less threatening. When questioned on a recent incident in which a Trump fan at a rally in North Carolina sucker-punched a black protester in the face, Trump expressed dislike for the incident. But he understood. His supporters “have anger that’s unbelievable. They love this country. They don’t like seeing bad trade deals. They don’t like losing their jobs.” | |
| Then he defended violent statements he’d made about protesters in the past by talking about “some protesters who are bad dudes … they are swinging, they are really dangerous … We had a couple big powerful strong guys doing damage to people.” Bottom line: these sorts of things are bad, but when they happen, the protestors have it coming. | |
| A decent chunk of the debate audience cheered, by the way. | A decent chunk of the debate audience cheered, by the way. |
| That’s an important thing to remember, because the rest of the GOP field would prefer voters to think that the Trump campaign is a recent, invasive violent species in their ecosystem, rather than a more aggressive mutation of the same species. Demonizing the left, minorities and foreigners as a mortal cancer growing unchecked within the American body politic has pretty much been the playbook since 1968. Angrily rejecting them is not only necessary but a constitutionally protected right for the good sorts of Americans. | That’s an important thing to remember, because the rest of the GOP field would prefer voters to think that the Trump campaign is a recent, invasive violent species in their ecosystem, rather than a more aggressive mutation of the same species. Demonizing the left, minorities and foreigners as a mortal cancer growing unchecked within the American body politic has pretty much been the playbook since 1968. Angrily rejecting them is not only necessary but a constitutionally protected right for the good sorts of Americans. |
| Related: American crossroads: Reagan, Trump and the devil down south | |
| And if that observation seems a little abstruse, then there was Ted Cruz to clarify it for you. You see, he understands the anger of people at Trump rallies because Barack Obama is an imperial president and “Washington isn’t listening to people”. He understands violence, because he can pivot it to his brand: #MakeDCListen. And as for Trump, Cruz, Republicans in general – they don’t need to take steps to condemn violence themselves, because curbing it is impossible anyway. It’s Obama’s fault. We just have to wait out the clock on his hate-inspiring dystopia. | |
| Things did not get any more sensible on foreign policy. When asked to defend his previous statements about going after terrorists’ families and killing them, which is a war crime, Trump said that the United States cannot be hamstrung by laws. Isis can drown people in cages, but we can’t waterboard. Solution: “We have to obey the laws, but we have to expand those laws, because we have to be able to fight on somewhat of an equal footing”. Addington, Bybee and Yoo would be proud. | |
| When asked for comment, Marco Rubio distanced himself from Trump by essentially saying the exact same thing. We will not go after the families of terrorists, just the terrorists themselves. We will do that by expanding the army, navy and air force – three notoriously pinpoint-precise entities that historically exhibit near priest-like restraint and never kill things in the same vicinity as terrorists, like families. He also repeated his call to take terrorists to Guantánamo and do everything we can to find out everything we know. It’s a cute allusion to indefinite detention and torture, which is a war crime. | |
| Ted Cruz did not repeat her earlier calls to carpet bomb areas of the Middle East where Isis hides – which would not only be just as futile as every other historical incidence of carpet bombing, but would also be a war crime. His followers have probably not forgotten, though. | Ted Cruz did not repeat her earlier calls to carpet bomb areas of the Middle East where Isis hides – which would not only be just as futile as every other historical incidence of carpet bombing, but would also be a war crime. His followers have probably not forgotten, though. |
| Related: Ben Carson to endorse Donald Trump before crucial Florida primary | |
| If you want to round out the depressing tour of insanity, there was also Marco Rubio’s statement on climate change, which breaks down to these component parts: | If you want to round out the depressing tour of insanity, there was also Marco Rubio’s statement on climate change, which breaks down to these component parts: |
| Singling out Rubio might seem unfair, like physically kicking a rejected contestant out the door, but his responses to what even the American military and intelligence committee considers a massive coming global security and economic crisis are no more or less intelligent than anyone else’s, except Kasich, who matters almost as little. | Singling out Rubio might seem unfair, like physically kicking a rejected contestant out the door, but his responses to what even the American military and intelligence committee considers a massive coming global security and economic crisis are no more or less intelligent than anyone else’s, except Kasich, who matters almost as little. |
| If there is any lesson here, it is that a measured professional-sounding set of stupid ideas is no less dangerous than one screamed from a step-pyramid of upended shopping carts. It just makes it easier for people enamored of unreasonable things to subscribe to such stupid ideas in public. | |
| That’s a lesson Donald Trump has learned, and he ended the evening with a Bernie Sanders-esque sales pitch about all the new voters he’s attracting. “Embrace these people, who for the first time ever love the Republican party,” he said. “Be smart and unify.” | |
| He just may make it happen. |