This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/mar/24/uk-seeks-review-un-julian-assange-arbitrary-detention
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| UK seeks review of UN Julian Assange 'arbitrary detention' finding | UK seeks review of UN Julian Assange 'arbitrary detention' finding |
| (about 1 hour later) | |
| The British government has formally asked a United Nations panel to review its finding that Julian Assange is “arbitrarily detained” in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, calling the opinion “deeply flawed”. | The British government has formally asked a United Nations panel to review its finding that Julian Assange is “arbitrarily detained” in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, calling the opinion “deeply flawed”. |
| In its first formal response to the finding of the UN working group on arbitrary detention, which published its opinion in February, the Foreign Office minister Hugo Swire said in a statement: “The original conclusions of the UN working group are inaccurate and should be reviewed. We want to ensure the working group is in possession of the full facts. Our request for a review of the opinion sets those facts out clearly. | In its first formal response to the finding of the UN working group on arbitrary detention, which published its opinion in February, the Foreign Office minister Hugo Swire said in a statement: “The original conclusions of the UN working group are inaccurate and should be reviewed. We want to ensure the working group is in possession of the full facts. Our request for a review of the opinion sets those facts out clearly. |
| Related: Britain 'sets dangerous precedent' by defying UN report on Assange | |
| “Julian Assange has never been arbitrarily detained by the UK, and is in fact voluntarily avoiding lawful arrest by choosing to remain in the Ecuadorian embassy. The UK continues to have a legal obligation to extradite him to Sweden.” | “Julian Assange has never been arbitrarily detained by the UK, and is in fact voluntarily avoiding lawful arrest by choosing to remain in the Ecuadorian embassy. The UK continues to have a legal obligation to extradite him to Sweden.” |
| The WikiLeaks founder has been confined to the embassy in London since July 2012, when he sought asylum in a bid to avoid extradition to Sweden over sexual assault allegations, which he denies. | The WikiLeaks founder has been confined to the embassy in London since July 2012, when he sought asylum in a bid to avoid extradition to Sweden over sexual assault allegations, which he denies. |
| The international panel said on 4 February that it believed Assange’s confinement was arbitrary because of the length of time in bringing his case to resolution, citing in particular a “lack of diligence by the Swedish prosecutor in its investigations”. | The international panel said on 4 February that it believed Assange’s confinement was arbitrary because of the length of time in bringing his case to resolution, citing in particular a “lack of diligence by the Swedish prosecutor in its investigations”. |
| The government argues that the panel is not a judicial body and its findings are therefore not binding. “The working group’s opinion is deeply flawed and Mr Assange has never been the subject of arbitrary detention,” it said. “His human rights have been protected throughout the process and will continue to be protected if and when he is extradited to Sweden.” | The government argues that the panel is not a judicial body and its findings are therefore not binding. “The working group’s opinion is deeply flawed and Mr Assange has never been the subject of arbitrary detention,” it said. “His human rights have been protected throughout the process and will continue to be protected if and when he is extradited to Sweden.” |
| Speaking shortly after the working group’s findings were published, Philip Hammond, the foreign secretary, described them as ridiculous and said Assange was hiding from justice. | |
| Assange accused Hammond of insulting the UN, however, adding: “This is the end of the road for the legal arguments that have been put forward by Sweden and the UK.” | |
| The panel’s decision on whether or not to review its opinion will be made during its next session, beginning 18 April, the Foreign Office said. | The panel’s decision on whether or not to review its opinion will be made during its next session, beginning 18 April, the Foreign Office said. |