This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/md-politics/hogan-nominee-to-regulatory-panel-accused-of-feeding-information-to-governors-staff/2016/03/28/59d73af4-f4ff-11e5-a3ce-f06b5ba21f33_story.html
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Hogan nominee to regulatory panel accused of feeding information to governor’s staff | Hogan nominee to regulatory panel accused of feeding information to governor’s staff |
| (35 minutes later) | |
| A former aide to Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan (R) is being accused of improperly collaborating with the governor’s office after being appointed on an interim basis to the state Public Service Commission. | A former aide to Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan (R) is being accused of improperly collaborating with the governor’s office after being appointed on an interim basis to the state Public Service Commission. |
| Michael T. Richard was scheduled for a confirmation hearing before the Senate Executive Nominations Committee on Monday evening, amid questions from public-interest groups over whether his communications with Hogan’s office amounted to an attempt to give the governor an upper hand in winning favorable decisions from the commission. | Michael T. Richard was scheduled for a confirmation hearing before the Senate Executive Nominations Committee on Monday evening, amid questions from public-interest groups over whether his communications with Hogan’s office amounted to an attempt to give the governor an upper hand in winning favorable decisions from the commission. |
| Hogan nominated Richard in January to serve on the panel, which regulates Maryland utilities, taxi companies, railroads and telecommunications companies. Under Maryland law, commission nominees can serve on an interim basis during the confirmation process. | Hogan nominated Richard in January to serve on the panel, which regulates Maryland utilities, taxi companies, railroads and telecommunications companies. Under Maryland law, commission nominees can serve on an interim basis during the confirmation process. |
| According to emails obtained by the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, Richard gave information to his former colleagues in Hogan’s office about an offshore wind-power company’s application for renewable-energy credits and sought information from them as the commission was weighing a ruling on a solar energy project. | |
| Public Citizen and the Energy and Policy Institute, a clean-energy advocacy group, said the communications “create a disturbing picture of undue influence over decisions before the purportedly independent Public Service Commission” and could amount to talking to decision-makers without input from other interested parties. | |
| Hogan spokesman Matt Clark called Richard an “incredibly qualified person” who has done nothing wrong in his interim role. | Hogan spokesman Matt Clark called Richard an “incredibly qualified person” who has done nothing wrong in his interim role. |
| Clark attributed the concerns to “legislative muscle flexing” by the nominations committee. | Clark attributed the concerns to “legislative muscle flexing” by the nominations committee. |
| “It’s entirely appropriate for members of the PSC to take input from a variety of sources, including industry, advocacy organizations, the legislature and the governor’s office,” Clark said. “That’s what members should be doing — taking input and counsel from as many sources as possible.” | “It’s entirely appropriate for members of the PSC to take input from a variety of sources, including industry, advocacy organizations, the legislature and the governor’s office,” Clark said. “That’s what members should be doing — taking input and counsel from as many sources as possible.” |
| But the emails show Richard acting as more of an administration advocate and informer than an independent commissioner seeking guidance. | But the emails show Richard acting as more of an administration advocate and informer than an independent commissioner seeking guidance. |
| “This is NOT yet public information, but I wanted you to be aware,” Richard wrote Jan. 29 to Adam Dubitsky, Hogan’s policy director, about an offshore wind-power company’s application for renewable energy credits. “In short, there will be a 30-day internal review . . . So, there is time to form an Administration position and response. Again, this is for your information only.” | |
| In another email, Richard asked Dubitsky for a statement from the Maryland Energy Administration, which advises the governor on energy policy, saying it would bolster Richard’s efforts to scale back the ambitions of a solar-energy initiative. | |
| “Adam, I can use your help in Community Solar rule making process,” he wrote to Dubitsky in February. “Another Administration statement on the ‘pilot project’ size not exceeding 150MW would be helpful (so far I’ve only been able to talk the other commissioners down to 218MW) . . . let’s discuss a possible statement via MEA that I can use to vigorously assert the Governor’s office position on this.” | |
| Advocates argued that a commissioner feeding the administration information about internal deliberations would create a potential conflict of interest, especially because the executive branch could use that information when filing briefs aimed at influencing the commission’s rulemaking. | Advocates argued that a commissioner feeding the administration information about internal deliberations would create a potential conflict of interest, especially because the executive branch could use that information when filing briefs aimed at influencing the commission’s rulemaking. |
| Clark noted that Hogan’s predecessor, Martin O’Malley (D), also appointed members of his administration to the Public Service Commission — and those nominees were criticized for email exchanges they had with the panel while working for O’Malley. | |
| Those criticisms were raised by Republicans, and the appointees were defended by Democrats, Clark said. | Those criticisms were raised by Republicans, and the appointees were defended by Democrats, Clark said. |
| “I reject that there is some kind of nuanced difference between what we’re seeing today and what we saw four years ago,” Clark said. | “I reject that there is some kind of nuanced difference between what we’re seeing today and what we saw four years ago,” Clark said. |