This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/mar/30/uk-negotiate-eu-referendum-exit-two-years-lord-odonnell

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
UK would struggle to negotiate EU exit in two years, warns Lord O'Donnell UK would struggle to negotiate EU exit in two years, warns O'Donnell
(35 minutes later)
If Britain votes to leave the EU it would be “highly unlikely” exit terms could be negotiated within the required two years, according to the former cabinet secretary Gus O’Donnell. If Britain votes to leave the EU it would be “highly unlikely” exit terms could be negotiated within the required two years, according to the former cabinet secretary Lord O’Donnell.
“I’m in that camp that doesn’t think we can do it in two years,” Lord O’Donnell told the BBC. He called the idea of requesting more time to complete the process “a bit scary”. “I’m in that camp that doesn’t think we can do it in two years,” O’Donnell told the BBC. He called the idea of requesting more time to complete the process “a bit scary”.
O’Donnell was cabinet secretary, the most senior civil servant, for six years under Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and David Cameron. Gus O’Donnell was cabinet secretary, the most senior civil servant, for six years under Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and David Cameron.
Related: Support for leaving EU likely to be overstated in polls, analysis suggests
O’Donnell has not officially declared himself in favour of remaining in the EU in June’s referendum, but his comments echo concerns from some remain campaigners who say the two-year timetable laid out under the Lisbon treaty could prove unrealistic. To be extended, all remaining EU members must agree.O’Donnell has not officially declared himself in favour of remaining in the EU in June’s referendum, but his comments echo concerns from some remain campaigners who say the two-year timetable laid out under the Lisbon treaty could prove unrealistic. To be extended, all remaining EU members must agree.
“Obviously at the end of two years anything we haven’t negotiated has to be extended by unanimity of a vote excluding us, so that’s a bit scary,” O’Donnell said, indicating the process could linger for up to a decade.“Obviously at the end of two years anything we haven’t negotiated has to be extended by unanimity of a vote excluding us, so that’s a bit scary,” O’Donnell said, indicating the process could linger for up to a decade.
He cited the example of Greenland, which voted in 1985 to leave the then-equivalent of the EU, the EEC.He cited the example of Greenland, which voted in 1985 to leave the then-equivalent of the EU, the EEC.
“Greenland has a slightly smaller population than Croydon and it has one issue, and that’s fish,” O’Donnell said. “So with one issue … it took them not two years, but three. We have multiple issues. The idea that we can do it all in two years I think is highly unlikely.”“Greenland has a slightly smaller population than Croydon and it has one issue, and that’s fish,” O’Donnell said. “So with one issue … it took them not two years, but three. We have multiple issues. The idea that we can do it all in two years I think is highly unlikely.”
Those who support a UK exit from the EU argue that the process would be considerably more flexible, and that the UK could begin negotiations without formally triggering the deadline.Those who support a UK exit from the EU argue that the process would be considerably more flexible, and that the UK could begin negotiations without formally triggering the deadline.