This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/apr/14/canada-supreme-court-aboriginal-people-special-status

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Canada's supreme court gives Métis people 'Indian' aboriginal status Canada's supreme court gives Métis people 'Indian' aboriginal status
(5 months later)
Canada’s supreme court has ruled that more than 600,000 aboriginal people previously denied special legal status by the federal government should receive it, granting potential access to new rights and benefits.Canada’s supreme court has ruled that more than 600,000 aboriginal people previously denied special legal status by the federal government should receive it, granting potential access to new rights and benefits.
The court declared that Métis people – those of mixed aboriginal and European descent – and aboriginals not registered with the government are “Indians” under the Constitution Act of 1867, placing them in federal jurisdiction with respect to rights and benefits.The court declared that Métis people – those of mixed aboriginal and European descent – and aboriginals not registered with the government are “Indians” under the Constitution Act of 1867, placing them in federal jurisdiction with respect to rights and benefits.
The ruling allows Métis and unregistered aboriginals, or “non-status Indians”, to negotiate with the federal government for some of the same rights and benefits granted aboriginal people living on reserves. These include hunting and fishing privileges, tax breaks and assistance for medication, housing and education.The ruling allows Métis and unregistered aboriginals, or “non-status Indians”, to negotiate with the federal government for some of the same rights and benefits granted aboriginal people living on reserves. These include hunting and fishing privileges, tax breaks and assistance for medication, housing and education.
The case began in 1999, with the Congress of Aboriginal Peoples and one Métis and two non-status Indians as plaintiffs.The case began in 1999, with the Congress of Aboriginal Peoples and one Métis and two non-status Indians as plaintiffs.
A lower court had initially ruled in the plaintiffs’ favor, but the then-conservative government raised the case to the federal court of appeal, which upheld the previous ruling on Métis, but not unregistered aboriginals.A lower court had initially ruled in the plaintiffs’ favor, but the then-conservative government raised the case to the federal court of appeal, which upheld the previous ruling on Métis, but not unregistered aboriginals.
Joe Magnet, lawyer for the plaintiffs, said outside court that the lack of “Indian” status meant a lack of access to benefits and services some aboriginals badly needed.Joe Magnet, lawyer for the plaintiffs, said outside court that the lack of “Indian” status meant a lack of access to benefits and services some aboriginals badly needed.
“We will look forward to engaging the government as to how these discriminatory practices should be removed,” he said.“We will look forward to engaging the government as to how these discriminatory practices should be removed,” he said.
Canada’s prime minister, Justin Trudeau, said after the ruling the government respects the court’s decision and looks forward to talks.Canada’s prime minister, Justin Trudeau, said after the ruling the government respects the court’s decision and looks forward to talks.
“Canadians who don’t have the same chances as other Canadians do – that is something that has been going on for far too long,” he told reporters at an event in southern Ontario.“Canadians who don’t have the same chances as other Canadians do – that is something that has been going on for far too long,” he told reporters at an event in southern Ontario.
Related: Indigenous Canadians comprised 23% of country's murder victims in 2014
Canada’s aboriginals have higher poverty levels and a lower life expectancy than other Canadians and are more often victims of violent crime, addiction and incarceration.Canada’s aboriginals have higher poverty levels and a lower life expectancy than other Canadians and are more often victims of violent crime, addiction and incarceration.
Trudeau’s Liberal government announced additional funding in last month’s federal budget for First Nations communities in a bid for renewed, positive relations.Trudeau’s Liberal government announced additional funding in last month’s federal budget for First Nations communities in a bid for renewed, positive relations.
According to federal data, the Canadian government spent C$8.1bn ($6.32bn in US dollars) from 2014 to 2015 on aboriginal funding. There are roughly 700,000 status Indians and more than 400,000 Métis and 200,000 non-status Indians.According to federal data, the Canadian government spent C$8.1bn ($6.32bn in US dollars) from 2014 to 2015 on aboriginal funding. There are roughly 700,000 status Indians and more than 400,000 Métis and 200,000 non-status Indians.
One of the plaintiffs, Metis activist Harry Daniels, died before the case was heard. His son, Gabriel Daniels, who later joined the lawsuit, said his father “would probably be doing a jig right now”.One of the plaintiffs, Metis activist Harry Daniels, died before the case was heard. His son, Gabriel Daniels, who later joined the lawsuit, said his father “would probably be doing a jig right now”.