This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/20/nyregion/peter-liang-ex-new-york-police-officer-sentenced-akai-gurley-shooting-death-brooklyn.html

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Ex-New York Officer Gets 5 Years of Probation in Fatal Brooklyn Shooting Ex-New York Officer Gets 5 Years of Probation in Fatal Brooklyn Shooting
(about 5 hours later)
In a Brooklyn courtroom packed with the relatives of his victim, Peter Liang, the former New York City police officer who fatally shot Akai Gurley while on patrol in a housing project stairwell, was sentenced on Tuesday to five years of probation, escaping a prison term in the divisive police misconduct case. Former Officer Peter Liang will not serve any time in prison for fatally shooting an unarmed man in a Brooklyn housing project stairwell two years ago, but was instead sentenced on Tuesday to probation and community service.
The sentencing in State Supreme Court put to rest a politically contentious case that highlighted concerns over police accountability. It began in November 2014 when Mr. Gurley was hit by a ricocheting bullet in a dark stairwell of the Louis H. Pink Houses in the East New York neighborhood, joining a list of other unarmed black men who had been killed by the police around the country. The sentence in one of the most divisive police misconduct cases in recent New York City history came just moments after the judge took the unusual steps of ruling that the shooting was essentially an accident and reducing the jury’s verdict on manslaughter charges to the less severe criminally negligent homicide.
Though Mr. Liang, a rookie officer, had faced up to 15 years in prison for his conviction in February on manslaughter and official misconduct charges, Justice Danny K. Chun reduced the charge to criminally negligent homicide moments before the sentencing. The decision not to imprison Mr. Liang followed the recommendation of Ken Thompson, the Brooklyn district attorney. Mr. Thompson announced in March that he would not ask for prison time in part because no evidence existed that Mr. Liang had meant to kill or injure Mr. Gurley. Though the Brooklyn district attorney’s office promised to appeal the ruling, the sentencing was a decisive move in the politically contentious case that highlighted concerns over police accountability, especially in black neighborhoods, but never neatly fit the narrative of other killings by law-enforcement officers around the country. It is rare for police shooting cases even to be charged and brought to court; while this one resulted in a guilty verdict at a three-week trial this winter, the sentencing was deeply disappointing to the family of the victim, Akai Gurley.
Mr. Liang was also sentenced to 800 hours of community service. As Justice Danny K. Chun of State Supreme Court in Brooklyn imposed five years of probation and 800 hours of community service, Mr. Liang sat still at the defendant’s table showing little emotion. Behind him, the benches were packed with Mr. Gurley’s loved ones. When the hourlong hearing came to an end and it was clear that Mr. Liang would not serve time in prison, Hertencia Petersen, Mr. Gurley’s aunt, stepped into a hallway shouting: “There is no justice! Akai Gurley’s life didn’t matter!”
Leaving courtroom Mr. Gurley’s aunt Herntencia Peteresen called out in the hallway: “There is no justice! Akai Gurley’s life didn’t matter!” Mr. Gurley died on Nov. 20, 2014, when his heart was pierced by a ricocheting bullet that Mr. Liang had fired while on a night patrol in a dark stairwell in the Louis H. Pink Houses in the East New York neighborhood. In February, a jury convicted him of manslaughter and official misconduct, rejecting his testimony that the gun had simply gone off in his hand and finding that he had failed to help Mr. Gurley as he lay dying on a fifth-floor landing.
At the three-week trial this winter, the jury heard how Mr. Liang and his partner, Officer Shaun Landau, were on patrol in the Pink Houses on Nov. 20, 2014, when, at one point, Mr. Liang opened a door into an unlighted stairwell and his gun went off. The bullet glanced off a wall and struck Mr. Gurley, 28, who was walking down the stairs with his girlfriend, in his heart. Before the sentence was issued, Mr. Gurley’s girlfriend, Melissa Butler, who was with him when he died, told Mr. Liang that even today, she was still in pain and needed the solace of justice. “You took a piece of me,” she said. “You took a piece of my heart.”
Though the case was quickly caught up in the furor over the death of Eric Garner, who had died just months earlier while being arrested on Staten Island, the Gurley shooting never neatly fit the narrative of other high-profile police killings. Moments later, Mr. Liang himself stood and turned toward Ms. Butler and the others, apologizing for having killed a man they loved. “The shot was accidental,” he said. “My life has forever changed.”
Mr. Thompson recognized that difference in a sentencing memo issued last month, which referred to Mr. Gurley as “a completely innocent man who lost his life for no reason” but also said Mr. Liang had no prior criminal history and posed no threat to public safety and should therefore not face time in prison. It was at that point that Justice Chun announced that he was going to reduce the manslaughter verdict, saying there was no evidence that Mr. Liang was even aware of Mr. Gurley’s presence in the stairwell. “This was not an intentional act,” the judge said. “This was a criminally negligent act. As such, I find incarceration not necessary.”
Just minutes earlier, Paul Shechtman, the former officer’s lawyer, had said much the same thing, telling Justice Chun that while other police officers in recent years had maliciously hurt and killed young black men, Mr. Liang “is not them.”
After the hearing, District Attorney Ken Thompson released a statement saying he planned to appeal Justice Chun’s decision to reduce the jury’s verdict — an unusual move from a man who all along has taken a Solomonic approach to the complicated case.
From the start, Mr. Thompson faced enormous pressure to pursue an indictment against Mr. Liang, who killed Mr. Gurley the same year that Eric Garner died during a police arrest on Staten Island. As Brooklyn’s first black district attorney, Mr. Thompson had vowed to bring a heightened sense of social justice to the borough’s communities of color.
But after the conviction, Mr. Thompson issued a letter recommending that Mr. Liang should not serve time in prison. The letter referred to Mr. Gurley as “a completely innocent man who lost his life for no reason,” but also said Mr. Liang had no prior criminal history and posed no threat to public safety.
In court on Tuesday, Justice Chun said that Mr. Thompson’s recommendation was “entirely and completely appropriate.” He added that on that November night two years ago, shooting Mr. Gurley was “probably the last thing” on Mr. Liang’s mind.
As word of the sentence made its way onto the street, dueling groups of protesters erupted into chants and debate. About 60 people, waving signs and shouting, gathered around Ms. Petersen, Mr. Gurley’s aunt.
“Another black man has been murdered by the hands of the Police Department and the officer is not being held accountable,” she said. “This right here is not the end. We’re going to continue to fight until we get justice.”
Across the street, another crowd massed in support of Mr. Liang, who is of Chinese heritage. “Accident does not mean crime,” Helen Zhu said. “Chinese are no more silent. We just want justice — justice for all. All people’s lives matter.”