This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-36150758

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
What next for Manus Island asylum seekers? What next for Manus Island asylum seekers?
(4 months later)
Papua New Guinea has announced it will close a detention centre on Manus Island used by Australia to house asylum seekers. Australia has agreed to close a detention centre on a Pacific island that is used to house asylum seekers.
This comes after Papua New Guinea's Supreme Court ruled that holding people in such a camp was unconstitutional. Manus Island is part of Papua New Guinea (PNG). Its Supreme Court ruled in April that holding people in such a camp was unconstitutional.
So, what could happen next to about 850 men currently being held on the Pacific island?So, what could happen next to about 850 men currently being held on the Pacific island?
Immediate stepsImmediate steps
The fate of the asylum seekers appears to be in limbo, as the governments of both Papua New Guinea and Australia are now urgently seeking legal advice on what to do next. The closing date has not been announced.
Canberra is likely to wait for an official response from Port Moresby, before taking any steps. When Manus Island does close, the detainees will be moved to civilian life in PNG, or back to the countries they originally came from.
"It's a matter that we've got to go through the judgment, got to go through the implications, what the options are for the PNG government," Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull said on Wednesday. The Australian Broadcasting Corporation reports that the Australian government will help PNG with the costs of resettling the men.
"So, I can't provide a definitive road map from here right today," he added. Previous resettlement attempts have broadly failed.
PNG opposition politician Belden Namah, who brought the court case, has said he will be taking further legal action in the coming days. Some people have called for the asylum seekers to be compensated for damage and false imprisonment during their detention.
He says the asylum seekers must be released and compensated for damage and false imprisonment.
PNG positionPNG position
Following the court ruling, Prime Minister Peter O'Neill said: "Papua New Guinea will immediately ask the Australian government to make alternative arrangements for the asylum-seekers currently held at the Regional Processing Centre." Following the court ruling in April, PNG's Prime Minister Peter O'Neill said asylum seekers"deemed legitimate refugees" would be invited to live in the country "if they want to be part of our society and make a contribution to our community".
He said those "deemed legitimate refugees" would be invited to live in the country "if they want to be part of our society and make a contribution to our community". He added: "It is clear that several of these refugees do not want to settle in Papua New Guinea."
He added: "It is clear that several of these refugees do not want to settle in Papua New Guinea". However, not everyone in the country is happy with the decision.
Mr O'Neill did not outline any timetable for the closure of the facility. There have been reports of attacks on asylum seekers and some people do not like the idea of hundreds of people from the detention centre being resettled alongside them.
However, not everyone in the country is happy with the court's decision.
Australia spends millions of dollars in funding the detention centre, and many locals on Manus Island are employed at the facility.Australia spends millions of dollars in funding the detention centre, and many locals on Manus Island are employed at the facility.
"A lot of people will be losing jobs, a lot of people will be out of work," Manus Island lawmaker Ronnie Knight was quoted as saying by ABC.
Australia positionAustralia position
Canberra insists its asylum policy will not change, and the men held on Manus Island will not be allowed into Australia. Canberra insists its asylum policy will not change.
"This (court) decision doesn't bind the Australian government. It's a decision in the Supreme Court of PNG, so it is an issue for the PNG government to contemplate," Australian Immigration Minister Peter Dutton said.
"But we will work with a close partner in PNG, because we are as determined as ever to make sure these (asylum seeker) boats don't restart."
Australia says its tough policies have led to a sharp drop in the number of migrant boats, thus preventing many possible deaths at sea.Australia says its tough policies have led to a sharp drop in the number of migrant boats, thus preventing many possible deaths at sea.
The Labor opposition agrees with the government. However, Labor's immigration spokesman Richard Marles called on Mr Dutton to urgently go to Papua New Guinea for negotiations. "Our position, confirmed again today with Papua New Guinea, is that no-one from Manus Island Regional Processing Centre will ever be settled in Australia," Immigration Minister Peter Dutton said in a statement.
"Were it me at this moment, I'd be in PNG right now," Mr Marles told Australia's public broadcaster ABC. Where else might the detainees go?
"I'd be trying to work out how offshore processing can be maintained... Any other option is incredibly difficult." Another option for Canberra could be to shift the men temporarily to its offshore detention centres on Christmas Island [Australian territory] or the tiny Pacific country of Nauru.
Australia is likely to hold early elections on 2 July, and the formal announcement is expected in early May. The government would then be in a "caretaker mode", unable to take any decisions on the Manus Island problem until after the polls. A week ago, thousands of leaked reports detailed incidents of abuse, self-harm, violence and sexual assault at the Naura centre. The Australian government said many of the reports were unconfirmed.
Where refugees might go?
Mr Dutton said the options for the asylum seekers would be to go back to their home countries or settle in Papua New Guinea.
"These people will not be coming to Australia," he stressed, despite growing pressure from human rights groups.
Meanwhile, another option for Canberra could be to shift them temporarily to its offshore detention centres on Christmas Island (Australian territory) or the tiny Pacific country of Nauru, the BBC Jon Donnison in Sydney says.
There have also been suggestions that a third country may take in the refugees.There have also been suggestions that a third country may take in the refugees.
Australia has been negotiating with a number of countries - including New Zealand, the Philippines and Cambodia - on the issue. Australia has negotiated with a number of countries - including New Zealand, the Philippines and Cambodia - on the issue.
But Ian Rintoul, the spokesman for the Sydney-based Refugee Action Coalition group, says a positive outcome from such talks is unlikely.But Ian Rintoul, the spokesman for the Sydney-based Refugee Action Coalition group, says a positive outcome from such talks is unlikely.
"Australia has already trawled the Pacific," he told the BBC, adding that Canberra "has run out of the countries"."Australia has already trawled the Pacific," he told the BBC, adding that Canberra "has run out of the countries".
"Had they found such a nation... they would have stated it," Mr Rintoul said."Had they found such a nation... they would have stated it," Mr Rintoul said.
He added that in the end Australia would be forced to take in the refugees. Australia and asylum
Could they stay? Read more: Why are asylum seekers so controversial in Australia?
Such a possibility theoretically exists, reports suggest.
Papua New Guinea's government could declare the detention centre an "open" facility, granting asylum seekers freedom of movement.