This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/entertainment/7346093.stm

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Rowling to testify in Potter case Rowling arrives for Potter case
(about 3 hours later)
Author JK Rowling is to testify in a New York court this week over plans to publish an unofficial Harry Potter encyclopaedia. Author JK Rowling has arrived at a New York court to testify over plans to publish an unofficial Harry Potter encyclopaedia.
The contested guidebook, Harry Potter Lexicon, is based on material from an internet fan site of the same name.The contested guidebook, Harry Potter Lexicon, is based on material from an internet fan site of the same name.
Rowling claims the book violates her intellectual property rights.Rowling claims the book violates her intellectual property rights.
The author is suing writer Steve Vander Ark and his publisher RDR Books and the case is scheduled to last for most of the week.The author is suing writer Steve Vander Ark and his publisher RDR Books and the case is scheduled to last for most of the week.
According to the Associated Press, Rowling will be accompanied by a private security guard in the courtroom.
She will reportedly spend breaks in a jury room, away from fans and the press.
RDR's book constitutes a Harry Potter rip-off of the type I have spent years trying to prevent JK Rowling
In court papers filed before the trial, the author said she was "deeply troubled" by plans to turn the Lexicon website into a book.In court papers filed before the trial, the author said she was "deeply troubled" by plans to turn the Lexicon website into a book.
RDR's book constitutes a Harry Potter rip-off of the type I have spent years trying to prevent JK Rowling
"RDR's book constitutes a Harry Potter rip-off of the type I have spent years trying to prevent," she said."RDR's book constitutes a Harry Potter rip-off of the type I have spent years trying to prevent," she said.
The author has said she plans to write her own definitive Harry Potter encyclopaedia, including material that did not make it into the seven novels.The author has said she plans to write her own definitive Harry Potter encyclopaedia, including material that did not make it into the seven novels.
"If RDR's position is accepted, it will undoubtedly have a significant, negative impact on the freedoms enjoyed by genuine fans on the internet," she said."If RDR's position is accepted, it will undoubtedly have a significant, negative impact on the freedoms enjoyed by genuine fans on the internet," she said.
Literary warningLiterary warning
RDR Books said Rowling was seeking to "claim a monopoly on the right to publish literary reference guides, and other non-academic research, relating to her own fiction".RDR Books said Rowling was seeking to "claim a monopoly on the right to publish literary reference guides, and other non-academic research, relating to her own fiction".
If accepted, it said, her injunction "would dramatically extend the reach of copyright protection and eliminate an entire genre of literary supplements - third party reference guides to fiction".If accepted, it said, her injunction "would dramatically extend the reach of copyright protection and eliminate an entire genre of literary supplements - third party reference guides to fiction".
"By extension, it would threaten not just reference guides, but encyclopaedias, glossaries, indexes and other tools that provide useful information about copyrighted works.""By extension, it would threaten not just reference guides, but encyclopaedias, glossaries, indexes and other tools that provide useful information about copyrighted works."
The case will heard by Judge Robert P Patterson without a jury at US District Court in Manhattan. The case will be heard by Judge Robert P Patterson without a jury at US District Court in Manhattan.