This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/7346144.stm

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Domestic violence law 'worrying' Domestic violence law 'worrying'
(20 minutes later)
The government says it wants an "urgent" meeting with a top judge over fears changes to the law have stopped victims reporting domestic violence.The government says it wants an "urgent" meeting with a top judge over fears changes to the law have stopped victims reporting domestic violence.
Sir Mark Potter, President of the Family Division, has said the Domestic Violence Act's impact concerned him.Sir Mark Potter, President of the Family Division, has said the Domestic Violence Act's impact concerned him.
Another judge told the Times that since the 2007 law was introduced, up to 25% fewer victims had come forward.Another judge told the Times that since the 2007 law was introduced, up to 25% fewer victims had come forward.
Women fear the new law means their partners will get criminal records, Judge John Platt told the paper.Women fear the new law means their partners will get criminal records, Judge John Platt told the paper.
'Very worrying''Very worrying'
In a paper drawn up for Sir Mark, he said that figures extrapolated from six courts across the country suggested there had been a drop by 25% in the number of victims who had sought non-molestation orders - equivalent to 5,000 a year.In a paper drawn up for Sir Mark, he said that figures extrapolated from six courts across the country suggested there had been a drop by 25% in the number of victims who had sought non-molestation orders - equivalent to 5,000 a year.
"Either offenders have changed their behaviour - which seems extremely unlikely - or the victims do not want to criminalise the perpetrators," he told the newspaper."Either offenders have changed their behaviour - which seems extremely unlikely - or the victims do not want to criminalise the perpetrators," he told the newspaper.
"It is obviously very worrying.""It is obviously very worrying."
Changes in the legislation meant breaching the orders is now a criminal, rather than a civil, offence.Changes in the legislation meant breaching the orders is now a criminal, rather than a civil, offence.
Offenders can be jailed for up to five years.Offenders can be jailed for up to five years.
A spokesman for Sir Mark said: "The president is very concerned that, for whatever reason, the legislation appears to have led to a reduction rather than an increase in the protection afforded to victims of domestic violence as a result of the change of the law."A spokesman for Sir Mark said: "The president is very concerned that, for whatever reason, the legislation appears to have led to a reduction rather than an increase in the protection afforded to victims of domestic violence as a result of the change of the law."
A Ministry of Justice spokeswoman said: “We would be concerned if the courts were not making protective orders.A Ministry of Justice spokeswoman said: “We would be concerned if the courts were not making protective orders.
"We are seeking an urgent meeting with Sir Mark Potter to discuss his concerns.""We are seeking an urgent meeting with Sir Mark Potter to discuss his concerns."

Have you been affected by any of the issues raised in this story? You can send us your experiences using the form below:
Name