This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36271515

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Electoral Commission seeks Tory election expenses court order Conservative Party releases election expenses after court action
(about 4 hours later)
The Electoral Commission is seeking a court order to make the Conservative Party hand over documents, as part of its investigation into claims the party breached election spending rules. The Conservative Party has produced documents about its spending during the general election after the Electoral Commission took court action.
The watchdog applied to the High Court for a "document and information disclosure order", saying the party had failed to provide requested details. The watchdog applied to the High Court to force the party to disclose the documents as part of an investigation into an alleged spending rules breach.
The party said it had already agreed to comply by 13:00 on Thursday. Within hours, the commission said it had received the documents from the party and was reviewing them.
The allegations relate to accommodation costs of activists on its "battle bus".The allegations relate to accommodation costs of activists on its "battle bus".
The party acknowledges that due to an "administrative error" some accommodation costs for the activists were not properly registered, but insists the bus tour was part of the national campaign organised by Conservative campaign headquarters and as such did not have to fall within individual constituency spending limits. The Conservative Party acknowledges that due to an "administrative error" some accommodation costs for the activists may not have been properly registered, but insists the bus tour was part of the national campaign organised by Conservative campaign headquarters and as such did not have to fall within individual constituency spending limits.
Nine police forces are now investigating whether election spending for candidates were not properly recorded, and the case has led to calls for the new police and crime commissioner for Devon and Cornwall to stand aside while she is investigated over her part in the campaign.Nine police forces are now investigating whether election spending for candidates were not properly recorded, and the case has led to calls for the new police and crime commissioner for Devon and Cornwall to stand aside while she is investigated over her part in the campaign.
'Legal obligation''Legal obligation'
In a statement, the Electoral Commission said: "Using its powers under the Political Parties Elections and Referendums Act (PPERA) 2000, and in line with its enforcement policy, the Electoral Commission may issue a statutory notice requiring any person, including a registered party, to provide us with specific documents and/or information as part of an investigation.In a statement, the Electoral Commission said: "Using its powers under the Political Parties Elections and Referendums Act (PPERA) 2000, and in line with its enforcement policy, the Electoral Commission may issue a statutory notice requiring any person, including a registered party, to provide us with specific documents and/or information as part of an investigation.
"This places the recipient under a legal obligation to provide the required material."This places the recipient under a legal obligation to provide the required material.
"However, if the recipient does not comply with this statutory notice, the commission may apply to the High Court for a disclosure order which if granted would be the court compelling the respondent to release the required documents and information to the commission.""However, if the recipient does not comply with this statutory notice, the commission may apply to the High Court for a disclosure order which if granted would be the court compelling the respondent to release the required documents and information to the commission."
The commission said the Conservatives had failed to act properly on two statutory notices requiring it to produce information - providing "limited disclosure of material in response to the first notice (issued on 18 February 2016) and no material in response to the second notice (issued on 23 March 2016)" - despite being granted extensions to the original deadlines to comply. The commission said the Conservatives had failed to act properly on two statutory notices requiring it to produce information - providing "limited disclosure of material in response to the first notice (issued on 18 February 2016) and no material in response to the second notice (issued on 23 March 2016)" - despite being granted extensions to the original deadlines to comply.
The commission's Bob Posner said: "If parties under investigation do not comply with our requirements for the disclosure of relevant material in reasonable time and after sufficient opportunity to do so, the commission can seek recourse through the courts. Prior to receiving the information, the commission's Bob Posner said: "If parties under investigation do not comply with our requirements for the disclosure of relevant material in reasonable time and after sufficient opportunity to do so, the commission can seek recourse through the courts.
"We are today asking the court to require the party to fully disclose the documents and information we regard as necessary to effectively progress our investigation into the party's campaign spending returns.""We are today asking the court to require the party to fully disclose the documents and information we regard as necessary to effectively progress our investigation into the party's campaign spending returns."
A Conservative Party spokeswoman said: "We advised the Electoral Commission on 29 April that we would comply with their notices by 13:00 today - and we will do so. A Conservative Party spokeswoman said the party had advised the Electoral Commission on 29 April "that we would comply with their notices" by 13:00 on 12 May.
"There was no need for them to make this application to the High Court." "There was no need for them to make this application to the High Court," the spokeswoman added.