This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/may/16/freddie-gray-trial-baltimore-officer-garrett-miller-testimony

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Freddie Gray trial: officer Garrett Miller is first to testify against fellow defendant Freddie Gray trial: officer Garrett Miller is first to testify against fellow defendant
(35 minutes later)
Baltimore officer Garrett Miller became the first officer forced to testify against one of his fellow defendants on Monday in the set of criminal prosecutions over the death of Freddie Gray.Baltimore officer Garrett Miller became the first officer forced to testify against one of his fellow defendants on Monday in the set of criminal prosecutions over the death of Freddie Gray.
Miller was called as a witness by prosecutors, but his testimony may have done more to aid in the defense of fellow officer Edward Nero, who is on trial for charges of assault, reckless endangerment, and misconduct, all misdemeanors.Miller was called as a witness by prosecutors, but his testimony may have done more to aid in the defense of fellow officer Edward Nero, who is on trial for charges of assault, reckless endangerment, and misconduct, all misdemeanors.
Miller said it was he, not Nero, who detained, arrested and handcuffed Gray.Miller said it was he, not Nero, who detained, arrested and handcuffed Gray.
Prosecutors are advancing what many call a novel legal theory in Nero’s case, arguing that Gray’s arrest was illegal and that therefore any contact with Gray constituted assault.Prosecutors are advancing what many call a novel legal theory in Nero’s case, arguing that Gray’s arrest was illegal and that therefore any contact with Gray constituted assault.
“They do nothing that Terry requires and do a search that Terry does not allow,” said chief deputy state’s attorney Michael Schatzow of the encounter between Gray and the arresting officers, referring to the supreme court ruling Terry v Ohio, which allows officers to stop and detain someone long enough to frisk them.“They do nothing that Terry requires and do a search that Terry does not allow,” said chief deputy state’s attorney Michael Schatzow of the encounter between Gray and the arresting officers, referring to the supreme court ruling Terry v Ohio, which allows officers to stop and detain someone long enough to frisk them.
But Miller testified that Nero only got involved to help him pick Gray up after he asked for an asthma inhaler. “Officer Nero stands behind him, supporting his back,” Miller said describing Nero’s contact with Gray.But Miller testified that Nero only got involved to help him pick Gray up after he asked for an asthma inhaler. “Officer Nero stands behind him, supporting his back,” Miller said describing Nero’s contact with Gray.
Miller also testified that it was the responsibility of the van driver, Caesar Goodson, who faces murder charges in Gray’s death, to make sure the seatbelt was fastened. Gray died of spinal injuries sustained while he was in the back of a police van, shackled and without a seatbelt.Miller also testified that it was the responsibility of the van driver, Caesar Goodson, who faces murder charges in Gray’s death, to make sure the seatbelt was fastened. Gray died of spinal injuries sustained while he was in the back of a police van, shackled and without a seatbelt.
A ruling by the court of appeals granted the state the right to call Miller to testify against Nero and the other fellow officers facing criminal charges in the death of Gray. Another officer, William Porter, had challenged a move to force him to testify after his trial ended in a hung jury, arguing that he would be incriminating himself before his own trial ended with a ruling. But the court ruled that the officers could be forced to testify against one another so long as that testimony is not used against them in their own cases.A ruling by the court of appeals granted the state the right to call Miller to testify against Nero and the other fellow officers facing criminal charges in the death of Gray. Another officer, William Porter, had challenged a move to force him to testify after his trial ended in a hung jury, arguing that he would be incriminating himself before his own trial ended with a ruling. But the court ruled that the officers could be forced to testify against one another so long as that testimony is not used against them in their own cases.
Miller’s own case is scheduled to go to trial in July. He also faces charges of assault, reckless endangerment and misconduct.Miller’s own case is scheduled to go to trial in July. He also faces charges of assault, reckless endangerment and misconduct.
Nero and Miller began chasing Gray on the morning of 12 April when Lt Brian Rice called in a foot chase – without announcing the reason for the chase. Miller pursued Gray into one of the courts of the Gilmor Homes public housing complex, where Gray turned around, forcing Miller to abandon his bike.Nero and Miller began chasing Gray on the morning of 12 April when Lt Brian Rice called in a foot chase – without announcing the reason for the chase. Miller pursued Gray into one of the courts of the Gilmor Homes public housing complex, where Gray turned around, forcing Miller to abandon his bike.
In the next court, Miller caught up with Gray, who surrendered. Miller testified that he handcuffed Gray, laid him prone, and subsequently moved him, while sending Nero to pick up the abandoned bike.In the next court, Miller caught up with Gray, who surrendered. Miller testified that he handcuffed Gray, laid him prone, and subsequently moved him, while sending Nero to pick up the abandoned bike.
At one point in his initial statements to investigators, Nero said: “We grabbed him, put him on the ground, and cuffed him.”At one point in his initial statements to investigators, Nero said: “We grabbed him, put him on the ground, and cuffed him.”
But probed under cross examination by Nero’s attorney as to whether his use of the word “we” suggested Nero was involved in the initial detention, Miller said: “I used the word ‘we’ because I worked with officer Nero since I worked in the western district and we did everything together.”But probed under cross examination by Nero’s attorney as to whether his use of the word “we” suggested Nero was involved in the initial detention, Miller said: “I used the word ‘we’ because I worked with officer Nero since I worked in the western district and we did everything together.”
According to Miller’s testimony, Nero also had physical contact with Gray at the van’s second stop – a block away from the initial site of arrest – where Gray was removed from the back of the van and Miller put flex cuffs and leg shackles on Gray. Lt Brian Rice got in the van and grabbed Gray, who was described as going limp, while Nero lifted his legs and helped put him into the van, head first and face down on the floor – a position that an expert witness in bioengineering testified could act as a mechanism for the kind of so-called “diving injury” that severed Gray’s spine.According to Miller’s testimony, Nero also had physical contact with Gray at the van’s second stop – a block away from the initial site of arrest – where Gray was removed from the back of the van and Miller put flex cuffs and leg shackles on Gray. Lt Brian Rice got in the van and grabbed Gray, who was described as going limp, while Nero lifted his legs and helped put him into the van, head first and face down on the floor – a position that an expert witness in bioengineering testified could act as a mechanism for the kind of so-called “diving injury” that severed Gray’s spine.
The defense moved to dismiss all charges after the prosecution rested its case, but the judge said that at this point in the proceedings, he was satisfied that there was testimony to justify hearing each of the charges.The defense moved to dismiss all charges after the prosecution rested its case, but the judge said that at this point in the proceedings, he was satisfied that there was testimony to justify hearing each of the charges.
Nero’s case is being heard by a judge rather than a jury, at his request. Since there is no possibility of a hung jury – as happened in the case of Porter, Nero’s case will most definitely provide the first verdict in the high profile case. Nero’s case is being heard by a judge rather than a jury, at his request. Since there is no possibility of a hung jury – as happened in the case of Porter, Nero’s case will most definitely provide the first verdict in the high-profile case.