This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/17/us/military-transgender-ash-carter.html

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Study Finds Few Obstacles to Lifting Military’s Transgender Ban Study Finds Few Obstacles to Lifting Military’s Transgender Ban
(35 minutes later)
WASHINGTON — A study commissioned by Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter found that a small portion of service members are transgender and allowing them to serve openly in the military would cost little and have no significant impact on unit readiness. WASHINGTON — A study commissioned by Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter found that a small portion of service members are transgender and that allowing them to serve openly in the military would cost little and have no significant impact on unit readiness.
The study by the RAND Corporation estimated that 2,450 of the 1.2 million active-duty members of the military are transgender, and that every year around 65 will seek to transition to the other gender.The study by the RAND Corporation estimated that 2,450 of the 1.2 million active-duty members of the military are transgender, and that every year around 65 will seek to transition to the other gender.
The RAND study said that if the Pentagon did not cover the medical procedures for service members — like hormone therapy and surgery — they would likely avoid seeking medical care and would have higher rates of substances abuse and suicide.The RAND study said that if the Pentagon did not cover the medical procedures for service members — like hormone therapy and surgery — they would likely avoid seeking medical care and would have higher rates of substances abuse and suicide.
Paying for the procedures would cost the Pentagon between $2.9 million to $4.2 million a year, the report said. By comparison, the Pentagon each year spends $6 billion of its $610 billion budget on medical costs for active-duty service members.Paying for the procedures would cost the Pentagon between $2.9 million to $4.2 million a year, the report said. By comparison, the Pentagon each year spends $6 billion of its $610 billion budget on medical costs for active-duty service members.
The Pentagon is wrestling with how to end its ban on allowing transgender people to openly serve at a time when a North Carolina law requiring people to use bathrooms and locker rooms corresponding to their sex at birth has prompted a heated debate. Democrats largely believe the law is discriminatory while some Republicans strongly support it.The Pentagon is wrestling with how to end its ban on allowing transgender people to openly serve at a time when a North Carolina law requiring people to use bathrooms and locker rooms corresponding to their sex at birth has prompted a heated debate. Democrats largely believe the law is discriminatory while some Republicans strongly support it.
Last July, Mr. Carter signaled that he was open to ending the Pentagon’s policy and created a working group to study how to integrate transgender people into the services. As part of that process, RAND was asked to examine the consequences of allowing transgender people to serve openly. The RAND study was completed in March, and Brad Carson, the senior Pentagon official in charge of the working group, gave a memo to defense officials in April on how to carry out the policy change. In July, Mr. Carter signaled that he was open to ending the Pentagon’s policy and created a working group to study how to integrate transgender people into the services. As part of that process, RAND was asked to examine the consequences of allowing transgender people to serve openly. The RAND study was completed in March, and Brad Carson, the senior Pentagon official in charge of the working group, gave a memo to defense officials in April on how to carry out the policy change.
But since then, Mr. Carson has resigned, the process has stalled, and Mr. Carter has declined to release the report. Mr. Carter’s aides said that they have a policy of not releasing reports until after a decision directly tied to them is made, but transgender advocates have accused Mr. Carter of sitting on the report because it shows that there would be few hurdles to allowing transgender people to serve openly. But since then, Mr. Carson has resigned, the process has stalled, and Mr. Carter has declined to release the report. Mr. Carter’s aides said they had a policy of not releasing reports until after a decision directly tied to them was made, but transgender advocates have accused Mr. Carter of sitting on the report because it shows that there would be few hurdles to allowing transgender people to serve openly.
A person who has worked on the transgender issue in the military provided a copy of the study to The New York Times on the condition of anonymity because he did not want to be identified disclosing a document that has not been released to the public.A person who has worked on the transgender issue in the military provided a copy of the study to The New York Times on the condition of anonymity because he did not want to be identified disclosing a document that has not been released to the public.
The study’s authors acknowledge that it is difficult to know how many transgender people there are in the services because the issue has not been widely examined. To estimate those figures, the authors relied on research that tried to determine the rate of transgender people in society.The study’s authors acknowledge that it is difficult to know how many transgender people there are in the services because the issue has not been widely examined. To estimate those figures, the authors relied on research that tried to determine the rate of transgender people in society.
The report is written mainly in an academic tone. But the authors used some of their most-pointed language to describe the negative effects of the military continuing its policy of not paying for transgender transitions. The report is written mainly in an academic tone. But the authors used some of their most pointed language to describe the negative effects of the military continuing its policy of not paying for transgender transitions.
“The discussion of health care among military transgender personnel is incomplete without considering the potential unintended effects of constraining or limiting gender transition-related treatment,” the report said. “Adverse consequences of not providing transition-related health care to transgender personnel could include avoidance of other necessary health care such as important preventive services, increased rates of mental and substance use disorders, suicide, and reduced productivity.”“The discussion of health care among military transgender personnel is incomplete without considering the potential unintended effects of constraining or limiting gender transition-related treatment,” the report said. “Adverse consequences of not providing transition-related health care to transgender personnel could include avoidance of other necessary health care such as important preventive services, increased rates of mental and substance use disorders, suicide, and reduced productivity.”
Transgender people who are denied health care may turn to other solutions “such as injecting construction-grade silicon into their bodies to alter their shape,” the report said. Studies have shown that there is a dramatic reduction in suicide rates among transgender people after they receive surgery, it added.Transgender people who are denied health care may turn to other solutions “such as injecting construction-grade silicon into their bodies to alter their shape,” the report said. Studies have shown that there is a dramatic reduction in suicide rates among transgender people after they receive surgery, it added.
One of the most difficult issues the Pentagon would have to confront with transgender service members would be how to deal with them in the period of time before and during their gender transition, the report said.One of the most difficult issues the Pentagon would have to confront with transgender service members would be how to deal with them in the period of time before and during their gender transition, the report said.
“DoD will need to establish policies of when individuals may use the uniforms, physical standards, and facilities (e.g. barracks, restrooms) of their target gender,” the report said. The military would need to give the members mental health screening before deployments to ensure their readiness, it added.“DoD will need to establish policies of when individuals may use the uniforms, physical standards, and facilities (e.g. barracks, restrooms) of their target gender,” the report said. The military would need to give the members mental health screening before deployments to ensure their readiness, it added.
The report said that it found the underlying assumption in the military was that the presence of transgender people would hurt bonding and operational readiness. It said that similar concerns were raised before gays and lesbians were allowed to serve openly in the military, and there was little evidence that this had been an issue. The report said it had found that the underlying assumption in the military was that the presence of transgender people would hurt bonding and operational readiness. It said that similar concerns had been raised before gays and lesbians were allowed to serve openly in the military, and that there was little evidence that this was an issue.
While there is limited public data, foreign militaries that have allowed transgender individuals to serve openly — like Israel, Australia and the United Kingdom — have had no significant problems with “cohesion, operational effectiveness, or readiness,” according to the report. While there is limited public data, foreign militaries that have allowed transgender individuals to serve openly — like Australia, Britain and Israel — have had no significant problems with “cohesion, operational effectiveness, or readiness,” according to the report.
Todd Harrison, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies who has read the report, said it confirmed that “the transgender population is less than one half of a percent of the military” and that “this is a nonissue in terms of the impact on the budget, military readiness, unit cohesion, and morale.” Todd Harrison, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, who has read the report, said it confirmed that “the transgender population is less than one half of a percent of the military” and that “this is a nonissue in terms of the impact on the budget, military readiness, unit cohesion, and morale.”
“There does not appear to be any justifiable reason to continue the military’s policy of discrimination against transgender service members,” Mr. Harrison added. “The annual cost of implementing the policy change is about how much the U.S. spends on operations in Afghanistan every hour. The cost of one F-35 could pay for about 30 years worth of transgender benefits.” “There does not appear to be any justifiable reason to continue the military’s policy of discrimination against transgender service members,” Mr. Harrison added. “The annual cost of implementing the policy change is about how much the U.S. spends on operations in Afghanistan every hour. The cost of one F-35 could pay for about 30 years’ worth of transgender benefits.”
Mr. Carter was asked about the issue twice last week, including by a cadet at the Air Force Academy. He said that “there aren’t any hang-ups” and he expected that the plans to begin the new policy would be completed soon. Mr. Carter was asked about the issue twice last week, including by a cadet at the Air Force Academy. He said that “there aren’t any hang-ups” and that he expected that the plans to begin the new policy would be completed soon.
“This is a complicated issue,” he said. “And I think it — it — it has a lot of ramifications that are very practical ones.”“This is a complicated issue,” he said. “And I think it — it — it has a lot of ramifications that are very practical ones.”
Aaron Belkin, the director of the Palm Center, a research institute that has studied the effects of having gays, lesbians and transgender people in the military, said that he was not reassured by Mr. Carter’s comments. Aaron Belkin, the director of the Palm Center, a research institute that has studied the effects of having gays, lesbians and transgender people in the military, said he was not reassured by Mr. Carter’s comments.
“What’s worrisome is that Carter has said this is a complicated issue, and we’ve learned in the past from ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ that that sometimes signals they are not moving towards a good place,” Mr. Belkin said. “We know that implementation and repeal of the ban is not complicated.”“What’s worrisome is that Carter has said this is a complicated issue, and we’ve learned in the past from ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ that that sometimes signals they are not moving towards a good place,” Mr. Belkin said. “We know that implementation and repeal of the ban is not complicated.”
Josh Earnest, the White House press secretary, on Monday defended Mr. Carter’s assertion that lifting the ban on transgender people serving openly in the military was “complicated,” and said that ensuring a new policy was effectively put in place “has higher stakes” when it comes to the Department of Defense than it does at other agencies.Josh Earnest, the White House press secretary, on Monday defended Mr. Carter’s assertion that lifting the ban on transgender people serving openly in the military was “complicated,” and said that ensuring a new policy was effectively put in place “has higher stakes” when it comes to the Department of Defense than it does at other agencies.
He said the president has been kept apprised of the review’s progress and that Mr. Carter is “conscientiously” trying to set the policy “effectively and expeditiously as possible.” He said that the president had been kept apprised of the review’s progress and that Mr. Carter was “conscientiously” trying to set the policy “effectively and expeditiously as possible.”