This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/may/17/mp-attacks-manchester-devo-health-deal

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
MP attacks Manchester devo health deal MP attacks Manchester devo health deal
(35 minutes later)
The move to devolve Greater Manchester’s £6m health and social care budget is a sham, one of the region’s MPs has said in calling for an independent assessment of the impact of the policy. The move to devolve Greater Manchester’s £6m health and social care budget is a sham, one of the region’s MPs has said, calling for an independent assessment of the impact of the policy.
Debbie Abrahams, the Labour MP for Oldham East and Saddleworth and a fellow of the Faculty of Public Health, said the initiative was about “delegation not devolution” and raised concerns about a lack of clarity surrounding the plans.Debbie Abrahams, the Labour MP for Oldham East and Saddleworth and a fellow of the Faculty of Public Health, said the initiative was about “delegation not devolution” and raised concerns about a lack of clarity surrounding the plans.
In April, Greater Manchester become the first local authority in England to take responsibility for health and social care funding from the central government.In April, Greater Manchester become the first local authority in England to take responsibility for health and social care funding from the central government.
Known locally as “devo health”, the deal was struck behind closed doors in February 2015 by the Greater Manchester combined authority and the chancellor, George Osborne, who sees Manchester at the heart of his northern powerhouse project.Known locally as “devo health”, the deal was struck behind closed doors in February 2015 by the Greater Manchester combined authority and the chancellor, George Osborne, who sees Manchester at the heart of his northern powerhouse project.
Simon Stevens, the chief executive of NHS England, said the deal had “the potential to be the greatest act of devolution there has ever been in the history of the NHS”. But the idea has also been criticised as technocratic and undemocratic.Simon Stevens, the chief executive of NHS England, said the deal had “the potential to be the greatest act of devolution there has ever been in the history of the NHS”. But the idea has also been criticised as technocratic and undemocratic.
At the time of the deal, the then shadow health secretary, Andy Burnham, the MP for Leigh, said the policy risked producing a “Swiss-cheese NHS” that would run counter to the principle of a universal and comprehensive service. Burnham is currently considering running to be Labour’s candidate for mayor of Greater Manchester.At the time of the deal, the then shadow health secretary, Andy Burnham, the MP for Leigh, said the policy risked producing a “Swiss-cheese NHS” that would run counter to the principle of a universal and comprehensive service. Burnham is currently considering running to be Labour’s candidate for mayor of Greater Manchester.
In a report on the state of the NHS in her constituency, Abrahams said she supported the principle of devolution, but added: “[Devo health] is about delegation not devolution. There are concerns that £6bn is considerably less than the size of the health and care economy, which is nearer £8bn. At the time there was also controversy about the secrecy of the deal and the lack of democratic mandate for such a move.”In a report on the state of the NHS in her constituency, Abrahams said she supported the principle of devolution, but added: “[Devo health] is about delegation not devolution. There are concerns that £6bn is considerably less than the size of the health and care economy, which is nearer £8bn. At the time there was also controversy about the secrecy of the deal and the lack of democratic mandate for such a move.”
Abrahams, who sits on the work and pensions select committee, said she had grave concerns about the lack of clarity surrounding the financial and governance arrangements of the policy. “The fact that the chief executive of health and social care in Greater Manchester will not take up his post until four months after devolved arrangements commenced is a case in point,” she said. Abrahams, who serves as shadow minister for disabled people, said she had grave concerns about the lack of clarity surrounding the financial and governance arrangements of the policy. “The fact that the chief executive of health and social care in Greater Manchester will not take up his post until four months after devolved arrangements commenced is a case in point,” she said.
The MP called for “a comprehensive, independent assessment of the impacts of the Devo Manc health and social care arrangements” to be completed as soon as possible. “I absolutely support the principles of devolution, but this deal is a sham,” she said.The MP called for “a comprehensive, independent assessment of the impacts of the Devo Manc health and social care arrangements” to be completed as soon as possible. “I absolutely support the principles of devolution, but this deal is a sham,” she said.