This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36319085

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Sun's Queen Brexit headline ruled 'misleading' Sun's Queen Brexit headline ruled 'misleading'
(about 4 hours later)
The Sun has been found in breach of press regulations for its front page headline suggesting the Queen was in favour of the UK leaving the EU, the press watchdog has ruled. The Sun breached press regulations with its front page headline suggesting the Queen was in favour of the UK leaving the EU, the press watchdog has ruled.
The headline, "Queen backs Brexit", published in March, was "significantly misleading", the Independent Press Standards Organisation (Ipso) said.The headline, "Queen backs Brexit", published in March, was "significantly misleading", the Independent Press Standards Organisation (Ipso) said.
Buckingham Palace complained, insisting the Queen was "politically neutral".Buckingham Palace complained, insisting the Queen was "politically neutral".
The newspaper was ordered to publish the decision "as a remedy", Ipso said. Editor Tony Gallagher said he did not accept an error had been made but had published the judgement as required.
The headline appeared alongside a picture of the Queen in ceremonial dress above the quote "EU going in wrong direction, she says". He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "We made a judgement that the headline was right and that it was backed up by the story.
"We are members of Ipso and we respect the Ipso code and that's why we publish their judgement in full. You're asking me if I accept we made a mistake - in all conscience I don't."
Ipso said the newspaper was ordered to publish the decision "as a remedy".
It appears at the bottom of page two of the paper - although there is also a headline on the Sun's front page referring to it.
The paper also leads its editorial column with its own verdict on the decision, saying that it respects Ipso and understands the Queen's complaint - but that it stands by all details in its story.
It points out Ipso ruled that only the headline had breached its code and tells readers: "Tabloid newspapers like the Sun have long made eye-catching assertions in headlines alongside a smaller headline to qualify or attribute them. It is a standard device."
The original "Queen backs Brexit" headline appeared below a smaller headline, saying "Exclusive: bombshell claim over Europe vote". There was also a a picture of the Queen in ceremonial dress above the quote "EU going in wrong direction, she says".
In the article The Sun reported that two unnamed sources had claimed the Queen made critical comments about the EU at two private functions.In the article The Sun reported that two unnamed sources had claimed the Queen made critical comments about the EU at two private functions.
One of the sources said they had witnessed a "bust-up" between the Queen and pro-EU former Deputy PM Nick Clegg in 2011 which it said left "no room for doubt about her passionate feelings over Europe". One of the sources said they had witnessed a "bust-up" between the Queen and pro-EU former Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg in 2011 which it said left "no room for doubt about her passionate feelings over Europe".
But Buckingham Palace said the headline meant the Queen was a supporter of the Leave campaign in the 23 June referendum - which it said was "misleading, distorted, and unsupported by the text".But Buckingham Palace said the headline meant the Queen was a supporter of the Leave campaign in the 23 June referendum - which it said was "misleading, distorted, and unsupported by the text".
Mr Clegg called the story "nonsense" but the Sun said it stood by its story and would defend itself "vigorously".Mr Clegg called the story "nonsense" but the Sun said it stood by its story and would defend itself "vigorously".
Mr Gallagher said: "I don't think were I doing this again tomorrow I would act in any way differently whatsoever, given what I know about the detail of the sourcing and given what I know about the detail of the conversation.
"Frankly we would be better packing up and going home as journalists if we didn't actually put these things in the public domain."
'Unsupported headline''Unsupported headline'
Reporting its decision, Ipso said the article itself did not breach the Editor's Code of Practice, but "the headline went much further than a claim about what the Queen might think".Reporting its decision, Ipso said the article itself did not breach the Editor's Code of Practice, but "the headline went much further than a claim about what the Queen might think".
"It was a factual assertion that the Queen had expressed a position in the referendum debate, and there was nothing in the headline, or the manner in which it was presented on the newspaper's front page, to suggest that this was conjecture, hyperbole, or was not to be read literally," it said."It was a factual assertion that the Queen had expressed a position in the referendum debate, and there was nothing in the headline, or the manner in which it was presented on the newspaper's front page, to suggest that this was conjecture, hyperbole, or was not to be read literally," it said.
Ipso added that "it did not follow from the comments the article reported that the Queen wanted the UK to leave the EU as a result of the referendum: that suggestion was conjecture" and was "significantly misleading - given that it suggested a fundamental breach of the Queen's constitutional obligations".Ipso added that "it did not follow from the comments the article reported that the Queen wanted the UK to leave the EU as a result of the referendum: that suggestion was conjecture" and was "significantly misleading - given that it suggested a fundamental breach of the Queen's constitutional obligations".
The complaint was upheld under clause one of the code of practice which refers to accuracy.The complaint was upheld under clause one of the code of practice which refers to accuracy.
The Queen has largely avoided making political statements in her 64-year reign but it is not the first time her comments on controversial areas have been reported.The Queen has largely avoided making political statements in her 64-year reign but it is not the first time her comments on controversial areas have been reported.
In the build-up to Scotland's 2014 referendum on independence, Buckingham Palace denied suggestions that the Queen would wish to influence the result, following reports that she was concerned.In the build-up to Scotland's 2014 referendum on independence, Buckingham Palace denied suggestions that the Queen would wish to influence the result, following reports that she was concerned.
And earlier this month she was filmed saying Chinese officials were "very rude" during last year's state visit by President Xi Jinping.And earlier this month she was filmed saying Chinese officials were "very rude" during last year's state visit by President Xi Jinping.