This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/may/25/south-korea-rejects-film-director-kim-jho-gwang-so-same-sex-marriage-case

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
South Korean court rejects film director’s same-sex marriage case South Korean court rejects film director’s same-sex marriage case
(about 3 hours later)
A lawsuit filed by a prominent gay film director and his partner seeking legal status for their same-sex marriage has been rejected by a South Korean district court in the first case of its kind. A lawsuit filed by a prominent film director and his partner seeking legal status for their same-sex marriage has been rejected by a South Korean district court in the first case of its kind.
Kim Jho Gwang-Soo and his long-time partner, Kim Seung-Hwan, held a wedding ceremony in Seoul in September 2013 and submitted their marriage registration form to their local authority – only for it to be rejected. Kim Jho Gwang-Soo and his long-time partner, Kim Seung-Hwan, held a wedding ceremony in Seoul in September 2013 and submitted their marriage registration form to their local authority, but it was rejected.
While homosexuality is legal in South Korea, same-sex marriage is not recognised and the country remains deeply conservative about matters of sexual identity.While homosexuality is legal in South Korea, same-sex marriage is not recognised and the country remains deeply conservative about matters of sexual identity.
The couple challenged the decision with a lawsuit filed in July last year, but the ruling on Wednesday sided with the local authority.The couple challenged the decision with a lawsuit filed in July last year, but the ruling on Wednesday sided with the local authority.
“Circumstances have changed concerning marriage ... but unless there is separate legislation, a same sex union cannot be recognised as marriage under the existing legal system”, the Seoul western district court said in a statement. “Circumstances have changed concerning marriage ... but unless there is separate legislation, a same-sex union cannot be recognised as marriage under the existing legal system”, the Seoul western district court said in a statement.
“Related laws, including the constitution and civil law, are premised on the notion of a conjugal bond meaning a union involving different sexes,” it said.“Related laws, including the constitution and civil law, are premised on the notion of a conjugal bond meaning a union involving different sexes,” it said.
The two Kims are the most high-profile gay couple in South Korea and the lawsuit they filed over their marriage licence was the first of its kind.The two Kims are the most high-profile gay couple in South Korea and the lawsuit they filed over their marriage licence was the first of its kind.
“We regret the court decision ... but we did see it coming,” Kim Seung-Hwan told AFP, adding that the couple intended to appeal against the ruling.“We regret the court decision ... but we did see it coming,” Kim Seung-Hwan told AFP, adding that the couple intended to appeal against the ruling.
The couple’s lawyer, Ryu Min-Hee, said the lawsuit had argued that civil law should be viewed through a “gender-neutral” prism that upheld equal rights provisions in the constitution.The couple’s lawyer, Ryu Min-Hee, said the lawsuit had argued that civil law should be viewed through a “gender-neutral” prism that upheld equal rights provisions in the constitution.
“When in doubt, all laws should be interpreted in a constitutional way,” she said, adding: “We’re disappointed but we’re not done yet.”“When in doubt, all laws should be interpreted in a constitutional way,” she said, adding: “We’re disappointed but we’re not done yet.”
Ryu’s legal team had always acknowledged that the likelihood of a district court judge declaring same-sex marriage legal was extremely slim.Ryu’s legal team had always acknowledged that the likelihood of a district court judge declaring same-sex marriage legal was extremely slim.
Gay and transgender South Koreans live largely under the radar in a country where many still regard homosexuality as a foreign phenomenon. But gay rights campaigners were buoyed by the US supreme court ruling in June last year that made same-sex marriage legal throughout the US.Gay and transgender South Koreans live largely under the radar in a country where many still regard homosexuality as a foreign phenomenon. But gay rights campaigners were buoyed by the US supreme court ruling in June last year that made same-sex marriage legal throughout the US.