This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36395954

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Paypal founder is 'vindictive comic book villain' Paypal founder is 'vindictive comic book villain'
(about 4 hours later)
Gossip site Gawker has called Paypal founder Peter Thiel a comic book villain who mounted a "vindictive campaign" of lawsuits against the site.Gossip site Gawker has called Paypal founder Peter Thiel a comic book villain who mounted a "vindictive campaign" of lawsuits against the site.
Gawker lost a $140m lawsuit Mr Thiel funded on behalf of ex- wrestler Hulk Hogan two months ago, and faces an uncertain future.Gawker lost a $140m lawsuit Mr Thiel funded on behalf of ex- wrestler Hulk Hogan two months ago, and faces an uncertain future.
Mr Thiel told the New York Times he funded legal actions as a deterrent rather than for revenge.Mr Thiel told the New York Times he funded legal actions as a deterrent rather than for revenge.
Mr Thiel was outed as gay by Gawker's Valleywag blog in 2007.Mr Thiel was outed as gay by Gawker's Valleywag blog in 2007.
Gawker chief executive Nick Denton likened Mr Thiel to a "comic-book villain" in an open letter.Gawker chief executive Nick Denton likened Mr Thiel to a "comic-book villain" in an open letter.
Valleywag also ran a number of stories about Facebook, which provided part of Mr Thiel's estimated $2.7bn fortune. Mr Thiel is on the Facebook board.Valleywag also ran a number of stories about Facebook, which provided part of Mr Thiel's estimated $2.7bn fortune. Mr Thiel is on the Facebook board.
On Thursday Gawker's Mr Denton said in the letter to Mr Thiel: "This vindictive decade-long campaign is quite out of proportion to the hurt you claim. Your plaintiff's lawyer, Charles Harder, has sued not just the company, but individual journalists... Peter, this is twisted."On Thursday Gawker's Mr Denton said in the letter to Mr Thiel: "This vindictive decade-long campaign is quite out of proportion to the hurt you claim. Your plaintiff's lawyer, Charles Harder, has sued not just the company, but individual journalists... Peter, this is twisted."
"Now you show yourself as a thin-skinned billionaire who, despite all the success and public recognition that a person could dream of, seethes over criticism and plots behind the scenes to tie up his opponents in litigation he can afford better than they.""Now you show yourself as a thin-skinned billionaire who, despite all the success and public recognition that a person could dream of, seethes over criticism and plots behind the scenes to tie up his opponents in litigation he can afford better than they."
But Mr Thiel told the New York Times: "It's less about revenge and more about specific deterrence... I saw Gawker pioneer a unique and incredibly damaging way of getting attention by bullying people even when there was no connection with the public interest."But Mr Thiel told the New York Times: "It's less about revenge and more about specific deterrence... I saw Gawker pioneer a unique and incredibly damaging way of getting attention by bullying people even when there was no connection with the public interest."
David Folkenflik, a media correspondent for US National Public Radio, said the lawsuit seemed designed to cause the company to collapse.David Folkenflik, a media correspondent for US National Public Radio, said the lawsuit seemed designed to cause the company to collapse.
"The lawsuit... $140m could take it down. It appears as though the lawsuits were designed in such a way to achieve that," Mr Folkenflik told the Today programme."The lawsuit... $140m could take it down. It appears as though the lawsuits were designed in such a way to achieve that," Mr Folkenflik told the Today programme.
He said certain parts of the lawsuit were dropped because they could have resulted in a payout from Gawker's insurance companies, with the result that Gawker "would have to pay for it out of pocket."He said certain parts of the lawsuit were dropped because they could have resulted in a payout from Gawker's insurance companies, with the result that Gawker "would have to pay for it out of pocket."
Analysis
Tom Espiner, BBC Business reporter
There's another facet to this story: Mr Thiel is a director at Facebook, and the company is trying to persuade media organisations to host their content on its website.
It needs companies to provide content - usually for free - to give people more reasons to visit Facebook, so it can sell advertising.
But news organisations tend to feel quite strongly about freedom of speech - they are generally for it - after all, it is their stock-in-trade, and central to their own business models.
So for Facebook, it might not play too well to the crowd that one of its directors funded a lawsuit against Gawker Media. A move some have interpreted as an attack on free expression.
Facebook has an AGM coming up towards the end of June, and some investors may be interested to know how it will handle the issue.
However, Mr Thiel is one of its big investors, so any real action against him by Facebook would be very surprising.
Mr Thiel backed a privacy case against Gawker brought by ex-professional wrestler Hulk Hogan, who won $140m damages after Gawker published a sex tape. Gawker intends to appeal.Mr Thiel backed a privacy case against Gawker brought by ex-professional wrestler Hulk Hogan, who won $140m damages after Gawker published a sex tape. Gawker intends to appeal.
The video was put up online in 2012 after Mr Hogan, whose given name is Terry Bollea, was secretly filmed having sex with his friend's wife.The video was put up online in 2012 after Mr Hogan, whose given name is Terry Bollea, was secretly filmed having sex with his friend's wife.
Mr Hogan's legal team successfully argued Gawker had violated his privacy and the video was not newsworthy.Mr Hogan's legal team successfully argued Gawker had violated his privacy and the video was not newsworthy.
Nick Denton was ordered to pay $10m, and the journalist who posted the video and wrote the accompanying article, AJ Daulerio, must pay $100,000.Nick Denton was ordered to pay $10m, and the journalist who posted the video and wrote the accompanying article, AJ Daulerio, must pay $100,000.
The closely-watched case raised questions about freedom of the press in the digital age.The closely-watched case raised questions about freedom of the press in the digital age.