This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/02/world/europe/reprint-of-hitlers-mein-kampf-tests-german-law.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Reprint of Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’ Tests German Law Reprint of Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’ Tests German Law
(35 minutes later)
BERLIN — A German publisher of right-wing books has begun selling a reprinted version of Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” that was originally issued in 1943 by the Nazi party’s central publishing house, a move that risks violating Germany’s law against the distribution of Nazi propaganda. BERLIN — A German publisher of right-wing books has begun selling a reprint of Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf,” originally issued in 1943 by the Nazi party’s central publishing house, a move that risks violating Germany’s law against the distribution of Nazi propaganda.
A copyright on “Mein Kampf” that was held by the Bavarian government expired on Dec. 31, and an annotated scholarly edition was published earlier this year with government permission. A copyright on “Mein Kampf” that was held by the Bavarian government expired on Dec. 31, and an annotated scholarly edition was published this year with government permission.
Now, state prosecutors in Leipzig, where the publisher, Der Shelm, is based, have started an investigation into whether they can press charges on grounds of incitement. Last week, prosecutors in Bamberg opened a separate investigation after a bookseller, who was not identified, advertised Der Shelm’s edition. Now, state prosecutors in the German city of Leipzig, where the publisher, Der Schelm, is based, are investigating whether they can press charges . Last week, prosecutors in Bamberg opened a separate investigation after a bookseller, who was not identified, advertised Der Schelm’s edition.
Although Hitler’s two-volume treatise, written between 1924 and 1927 and laying out his ideas on race and violence, is widely available on the internet, the annotated version remains the only publication allowed by law in Germany. The 3,500 comments accompanying the text provide critical context for the work, and are aimed in part at preventing a new generation taking up Nazi ideologies. Although Hitler’s two-volume treatise, written from 1924 to 1927 and laying out his ideas on race and violence, is widely available on the internet, the annotated version is the only one that is legal in Germany. The 3,500 comments accompanying the text provide context for the work, and they are aimed, in part, at trying to prevent a new generation from taking up Nazi ideologies.
“Promoting an edition without annotations is considered a criminal offense,” Christopher Rosenbusch, a spokesman for prosecutors in Bamberg, said on Wednesday.“Promoting an edition without annotations is considered a criminal offense,” Christopher Rosenbusch, a spokesman for prosecutors in Bamberg, said on Wednesday.
The edition being offered by Der Shelm is advertised as “unchanged and without comment, for critical assessment.” The house, which also offers a reprinted edition of the German translation of Henry Ford’s “The International Jew,” encourages its readers to “have the courage to make your own judgment.” The Der Schelm edition is advertised as “unchanged and without comment, for critical assessment.” The house, which also offers a reprinted edition of the German translation of Henry Ford’s “International Jew,” encourages its readers to “have the courage to make your own judgment.”
The move comes as a new far-right political party, Alternative for Germany, or I.A.D. in German, has risen in popularity in part by appealing to fears linked to the arrival last year of a million migrants and by questioning many of the liberal policies and premises that have dominated public discourse in postwar Germany. The move comes as a new far-right political party, Alternative for Germany, has risen in popularity, in part, by appealing to fears linked to the arrival last year of a million migrants and by questioning many of the liberal policies and premises that have dominated public discourse in postwar Germany.