This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/education/6144638.stm

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Oxford dons back finance reform Dons move towards finance reform
(about 23 hours later)
Academics at Oxford University have backed reforms which could hand financial control to outsiders. Academics at Oxford University have taken a step towards handing financial control to outsiders.
Vice-chancellor John Hood wants to change the 900-year-old tradition of its self-governing council and bring in external members to oversee finances.Vice-chancellor John Hood wants to change the 900-year-old tradition of its self-governing council and bring in external members to oversee finances.
Academics voted 652 for and 507 against an amendment to a white paper which may lead to a proposed financial board having a majority of external members. The university's ruling body adopted, by 652 votes to 507, a compromise amendment which could see the balance of power remain in internal hands.
Opponents intend to reject wider plans at a second vote later this month. This makes it more likely Dr Hood will win the main vote later this month.
During the two-hour debate in Sheldonian Theatre, a letter from government funding chiefs was read out calling those voting to back legislation for a "lay majority". During the two-hour debate in the Sheldonian Theatre, a letter from government funding chiefs was read out calling on those voting to back legislation for a "lay majority" - external members in control.
David Eastwood, chief executive of the Higher Education Funding Council for England, wrote: "In our view it is difficult to see how the standards for good governance can be met by any higher education institution without that body having an external majority on its executive governing body." The chief executive of the Higher Education Funding Council for England, David Eastwood, wrote: "In our view it is difficult to see how the standards for good governance can be met by any higher education institution without that body having an external majority on its executive governing body."
The university says rapid financial growth demands more control.The university says rapid financial growth demands more control.
Fresh challengesFresh challenges
A university spokesman said: "Income and expenditure have doubled, research revenues have more than tripled, student numbers have grown by 20% and new departments and institutes have been established.A university spokesman said: "Income and expenditure have doubled, research revenues have more than tripled, student numbers have grown by 20% and new departments and institutes have been established.
"This diversity and dynamism has brought with it fresh challenges so Oxford needs the right framework in which to prosper and to maintain its reputation for excellence in all its activities.""This diversity and dynamism has brought with it fresh challenges so Oxford needs the right framework in which to prosper and to maintain its reputation for excellence in all its activities."
There are currently 25 members of the university council - including four lay members - responsible for both academic and financial matters.There are currently 25 members of the university council - including four lay members - responsible for both academic and financial matters.
Dr Hood proposes to replace this with separate academic and financial boards. The financial board would have a slim majority from outside the university.Dr Hood proposes to replace this with separate academic and financial boards. The financial board would have a slim majority from outside the university.
It will do nothing, absolutely nothing to solve Oxford's main current problem which is that it needs more money Nicholas BamforthIt will do nothing, absolutely nothing to solve Oxford's main current problem which is that it needs more money Nicholas Bamforth
His proposal is for the council to be composed of seven external and seven internal members plus a chairman - who would be the Chancellor, Lord Patten, for the first five years.His proposal is for the council to be composed of seven external and seven internal members plus a chairman - who would be the Chancellor, Lord Patten, for the first five years.
After that, an existing external member of council becomes chairman.After that, an existing external member of council becomes chairman.
The amendment would make it possible that the replacement council member could be an external or an internal candidate. The amendment agreed on Tuesday makes it possible that the replacement council member could be an internal candidate.
The parliament of 3,500 academics would make that decision. The university's ruling congregation of 3,500 academics would make the decision.
Brought by supporters of Dr Hood, the amendment was backed by a majority. However, it is pointed out that the internal majority would include the vice-chancellor and the representative of Oxford's colleges - so, as things stand, Dr Hood would still have control.
Rebels now plan to oppose the whole amended plans when they are brought back before the congregation once more on 28 November. The amendment, brought by supporters of his, was backed by a majority of 145.
Rebels now plan to oppose the whole amended plans when they are brought before the congregation once more on 28 November.
Lack of controlLack of control
The critics say that even if the extra place were granted to an internal member it would not alter the council substantially in their favour.The critics say that even if the extra place were granted to an internal member it would not alter the council substantially in their favour.
Queen's College law fellow Nicholas Bamforth opposes Dr Hood's plans.Queen's College law fellow Nicholas Bamforth opposes Dr Hood's plans.
"It will do nothing, absolutely nothing, to solve Oxford's main current problem which is that it needs more money," he said."It will do nothing, absolutely nothing, to solve Oxford's main current problem which is that it needs more money," he said.
He said the costs of the proposal outweighed any benefits and what Oxford really needed was for academics to take more control.He said the costs of the proposal outweighed any benefits and what Oxford really needed was for academics to take more control.
But Professor John Kay, who resigned as director of the university's business school six years ago said Oxford needed urgent changes to be made to the way it is run. But Professor John Kay, a former director of the university's business school, said Oxford needed urgent changes to the way it was run.
"What it doesn't have is professional management in a number of areas in which it needs it," he said."What it doesn't have is professional management in a number of areas in which it needs it," he said.
"For example, financial control has been missing for years - the new vice-chancellor has taken quite a lot of action to rectify that and quite a lot more needs to be taken.""For example, financial control has been missing for years - the new vice-chancellor has taken quite a lot of action to rectify that and quite a lot more needs to be taken."