This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-sussex-36472234

The article has changed 11 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Disabled girl handcuffed by Sussex Police, IPCC finds Disabled girl handcuffed by Sussex Police, IPCC finds
(about 2 hours later)
An 11-year-old girl with a neurological disability was handcuffed and put in leg restraints while being held in custody, the police watchdog has found.An 11-year-old girl with a neurological disability was handcuffed and put in leg restraints while being held in custody, the police watchdog has found.
The girl was detained for a total of 60 hours without an appropriate adult by Sussex Police. The girl was detained for a total of 60 hours without an appropriate adult by Sussex Police in 2012.
Her mother, known as Ms H, said it had been "nothing short of a nightmare".
A number of officers and staff members had a case to answer for misconduct, the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) said.A number of officers and staff members had a case to answer for misconduct, the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) said.
Sussex Police said it would respond to any "new learning" identified.Sussex Police said it would respond to any "new learning" identified.
The girl, named Child H in the IPCC's report, was arrested three times and detained under the Mental Health Act once between 2 February and 2 March 2012. Anti-spit hood
Her disability had not been diagnosed at the time of the police contact, but her mother had told officers she believed she had an autism spectrum disorder. In a statement through her solicitors, Ms H said: "My daughter's contact with the police in 2012 was nothing short of a nightmare for both of us.
Despite this, the IPCC found she was twice held overnight in police cells, without a parent, guardian or social worker present to support her.
She was also restrained using a mesh anti-spit hood, handcuffs and leg straps.
Misconduct findings
On a number of occasions, officers did not record any rationale for their use of force on the youngster, who has "a neurological disability which can cause challenging behaviour", inspectors said.
Her mother, known as Ms H, said in a statement through her solicitors: "My daughter's contact with the police in 2012 was nothing short of a nightmare for both of us.
"At the time her disability meant that she could behave in very challenging ways, but what she needed was patience, respect and the support of her mother."At the time her disability meant that she could behave in very challenging ways, but what she needed was patience, respect and the support of her mother.
"Instead she was locked up in a police station without me or anyone else who knew her for support."Instead she was locked up in a police station without me or anyone else who knew her for support.
"I know that some of the officers were doing their best, but I cannot understand why others thought it was appropriate to put an 11-year-old girl in handcuffs and leg restraints."I know that some of the officers were doing their best, but I cannot understand why others thought it was appropriate to put an 11-year-old girl in handcuffs and leg restraints.
"I can't accept that it will ever be appropriate for the police to hood a disabled child, regardless of how they behave."I can't accept that it will ever be appropriate for the police to hood a disabled child, regardless of how they behave.
"I call on Sussex Police to stop doing this to children immediately.""I call on Sussex Police to stop doing this to children immediately."
The girl, named Child H in the IPCC's report, was arrested three times and detained under the Mental Health Act once between 2 February and 2 March 2012.
Her disability had not been diagnosed at the time of the police contact, but her mother had told officers she believed she had an autism spectrum disorder.
Despite this, the IPCC found she was twice held overnight in police cells, without a parent, guardian or social worker present to support her.
She was also restrained using a mesh anti-spit hood, handcuffs and leg straps.
Misconduct findings
IPCC recommendationsIPCC recommendations
The watchdog made a number of recommendations after its investigation, including:The watchdog made a number of recommendations after its investigation, including:
• Improved training on the use of force on children and adults with mental illness, to ensure the use of force is avoided wherever possible• Improved training on the use of force on children and adults with mental illness, to ensure the use of force is avoided wherever possible
• Additional training on detaining vulnerable people and the role of an appropriate adult• Additional training on detaining vulnerable people and the role of an appropriate adult
• Ensuring officers are accountable for their use of force• Ensuring officers are accountable for their use of force
On a number of occasions, officers did not record any rationale for their use of force on the youngster, who has "a neurological disability which can cause challenging behaviour", inspectors said.
IPCC Commissioner Jennifer Izekor said: "This was a complex investigation, which found Sussex Police officers failed to respond effectively to the needs of a vulnerable child.IPCC Commissioner Jennifer Izekor said: "This was a complex investigation, which found Sussex Police officers failed to respond effectively to the needs of a vulnerable child.
"While it is clear Child H had significant behavioural problems arising from her disability, Sussex Police and, indeed other agencies which were - or should have been - involved, did not appear to have the skills and capacity to respond to her effectively. The situation was exacerbated by the lack of understanding of Child H's complex needs.""While it is clear Child H had significant behavioural problems arising from her disability, Sussex Police and, indeed other agencies which were - or should have been - involved, did not appear to have the skills and capacity to respond to her effectively. The situation was exacerbated by the lack of understanding of Child H's complex needs."
Ms Izekor added she was pleased the force had engaged with Child H's family to improve any future dealings with her after the IPCC launched its investigation.Ms Izekor added she was pleased the force had engaged with Child H's family to improve any future dealings with her after the IPCC launched its investigation.
The force's temporary Deputy Chief Constable, Robin Smith, said: "As a chief officer I have a duty to protect officers and the public when we are called on for help, whether the threat comes from a child or someone who is unwell.The force's temporary Deputy Chief Constable, Robin Smith, said: "As a chief officer I have a duty to protect officers and the public when we are called on for help, whether the threat comes from a child or someone who is unwell.
"This is very often the case and it was on several occasions that the girl's mother called for our help."This is very often the case and it was on several occasions that the girl's mother called for our help.
"The application of any type of restraint is considered only when the level of resistance causes concern for the safety of the detained person, the officer and other members of the public.""The application of any type of restraint is considered only when the level of resistance causes concern for the safety of the detained person, the officer and other members of the public."