This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jun/08/un-commission-eritrea-international-criminal-court-hague

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
UN panel calls for Eritrea to be referred to Hague court Eritrea has committed widespread crimes against humanity, says UN
(about 3 hours later)
Eritrea’s widespread human rights abuses should be referred to the international criminal court as crimes against humanity, a United Nations commission of inquiry has said. The Eritrean government has committed crimes against humanity in a widespread and systematic manner, according to a UN inquiry that calls for perpetrators to be tried by the international criminal court.
The commission said the Eritrean government had made no progress on the most critical rights violations that it had first documented in an inquiry a year ago. Officials in Eritrea, the biggest source of African refugees in Europe in recent years, have enslaved up to 400,000 people, the inquiry says. The government used murder, forced disappearances, rape and torture “to instil fear in, deter opposition from and ultimately to control the Eritrean civilian population since Eritrean authorities took control of Eritrean territory [from Ethiopia] in 1991”, the UN Commission of Inquiry for Eritrea announced on Wednesday.
Eritrean refugees are one of the largest groups trying to cross the Mediterranean to Europe. The new report says 47,025 Eritreans applied for asylum in Europe in 2015. The report is an expanded version of a preliminary investigation last year.
“The crimes of enslavement, imprisonment, enforced disappearance, torture, persecution, rape, murder and other inhumane acts have been committed as part of a widespread, systematic campaign against the civilian population since 1991,” the commission’s chair, Mike Smith, said in Geneva.
He said the commission’s role was investigative, not prosecutorial, and he stopped short of identifying any potential suspects or saying how many there were.
The report said officials “at the highest levels of state” bore responsibility for crimes against humanity. The commission has compiled dossiers of evidence against a number of officials that “will be made available at the appropriate time to relevant institutions, including courts of law”.
Related: EU considering working with Sudan and Eritrea to stem migrationRelated: EU considering working with Sudan and Eritrea to stem migration
Yemane Gebreab, an adviser to Eritrea’s president, Isaias Afwerki, accused the panel of being “entirely one-sided”. Mike Smith, the Australian diplomat who chaired the inquiry, said: “Eritrea is an authoritarian state. There is no independent judiciary, no national assembly and there are no other democratic institutions. This has created a governance and rule of law vacuum, resulting in a climate of impunity for crimes against humanity to be perpetrated over a quarter of a century. These crimes are still occurring today.
The three-member UN commission, which was not allowed to visit Eritrea, said many violations occurred behind “the facade of calm and normality that is apparent to the occasional visitor to the country”. “There is no genuine prospect of the Eritrean judicial system holding perpetrators to account in a fair and transparent manner. The perpetrators of these crimes must face justice and the victims’ voices must be heard. The international community should now take steps, including using the international criminal court, national courts and other available mechanisms, to ensure there is accountability for the atrocities being committed in Eritrea.”
It highlighted the indefinite duration and abusive conditions of Eritrea’s military service. Smith estimated that between 300,000 and 400,000 people were enslaved in Eritrea, mostly through military conscription. The government issued an immediate rebuttal, saying the inquiry lacked “the minimum standards of rigour and professionalism”.
Yemane Gebreab, a spokesman for the government, said in a statement that the report “has no solid evidence or firm legal basis to support its extreme and unfounded charges … The methodology the [inquiry] followed in its work is so deeply flawed as to seriously compromise its findings and render its conclusions null and void.”
Based on testimony from 833 Eritreans, the report alleges that the president, Isaias Afwerki, and his aides have eradicated all forms of political opposition and independent media, collapsed the judiciary and abandoned the rule of law. Many described how Eritrea’s unique system of lifelong military service amounts to modern-day slavery.
Some revealed how they were tortured (pdf) inside government detention centres. Speaking anonymously, one man claimed to have been jailed after expressing dissent at a public meeting.
In prison, he said: “I was repeatedly beaten and tortured. Each time two people held me down and two others beat me with stakes and rubbers. They submerged my head in a deep container with dirty water. They beat me on my testicles many times. I fainted each time they did this. I have no testicles now, they disappeared.”
The situation has led hundreds of thousands to flee the country, and some to seek asylum in Europe following hellish journeys across the Sahara and the Mediterranean. Faced with this influx, some western countries, including Britain, are increasingly unwilling to offer Eritreans asylum.
Diplomatic dispatches and western reports from affluent parts of the capital, Asmara, have added to the perception that life is not as difficult as many Eritreans allege.
But the inquiry accuses such reports of whitewashing reality.
Related: It's not at war, but up to 3% of its people have fled. What is going on in Eritrea?
“The facade of calm and normality that is apparent to the occasional visitor to the country, and others confined to sections of the capital, belies the consistent patterns of serious human rights violations,” the report reads.
“The types of gross human rights violations in Eritrea documented by the commission … are not committed on the streets of Asmara, but rather behind the walls of detention facilities and in military training camps. Torture and rape are not normally perpetrated in the open.”
Following the report’s publication, the Refugee Council, a British charity for refugees, said the Home Office should rethink its asylum policy for Eritreans.
The Refugee Council’s head of advocacy, Lisa Doyle, said: “This report should send shockwaves throughout Whitehall. It confirms the ongoing gravity of the human rights situation in Eritrea; once again finding evidence of crimes against humanity.
“When a regime is on the verge of being referred to the international criminal court for gross human rights violations, it is dangerous and absurd that its citizens are being denied refuge in Britain.”