This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/02/giant-centipede-peacock-spiders-new-species-environment
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
It’s always a joy to discover a new species. But there is a downside... | It’s always a joy to discover a new species. But there is a downside... |
(4 days later) | |
In December 2000, George Beccaloni, an entomologist at the Natural History Museum in London, was honeymooning in southern Thailand. On a streambank near Khao Sok national park, he turned over a few rocks in search of interesting critters – and encountered a huge, startlingly ugly centipede, 20cm long. | In December 2000, George Beccaloni, an entomologist at the Natural History Museum in London, was honeymooning in southern Thailand. On a streambank near Khao Sok national park, he turned over a few rocks in search of interesting critters – and encountered a huge, startlingly ugly centipede, 20cm long. |
“It was pretty horrific looking,” he told National Geographic recently. “Very big, with long legs and a horrible dark, greenish-black colour.” | “It was pretty horrific looking,” he told National Geographic recently. “Very big, with long legs and a horrible dark, greenish-black colour.” |
The centipede escaped into the nearby stream and hid underwater until Beccaloni, armed with a stick and a water bottle, managed to trap it without suffering its venomous bite. (His wife, who curates the Natural History Museum’s spider and centipede collections, was as delighted as he was by the find.) Because centipedes normally live on dry land, Beccaloni thought he might have found something unusual, but the first expert he consulted told him that his specimen was just a variant of a widespread species. | The centipede escaped into the nearby stream and hid underwater until Beccaloni, armed with a stick and a water bottle, managed to trap it without suffering its venomous bite. (His wife, who curates the Natural History Museum’s spider and centipede collections, was as delighted as he was by the find.) Because centipedes normally live on dry land, Beccaloni thought he might have found something unusual, but the first expert he consulted told him that his specimen was just a variant of a widespread species. |
Several years later, however, he learned that his museum colleague Gregory Edgecombe had found two outsize aquatic centipedes near waterfalls in Laos. DNA analyses showed that the three centipedes, plus a fourth one collected in Vietnam in 1928 and misidentified in the museum’s archives, were examples of a previously unknown species. | Several years later, however, he learned that his museum colleague Gregory Edgecombe had found two outsize aquatic centipedes near waterfalls in Laos. DNA analyses showed that the three centipedes, plus a fourth one collected in Vietnam in 1928 and misidentified in the museum’s archives, were examples of a previously unknown species. |
In May, Beccaloni and Edgecombe published a formal description of the waterfall centipede – Scolopendra cataracta, the world’s first known aquatic centipede. | In May, Beccaloni and Edgecombe published a formal description of the waterfall centipede – Scolopendra cataracta, the world’s first known aquatic centipede. |
This chance encounter between arthropod and arthropod aficionado might seem unlikely, but it happens all the time. In 2012, during a reporting trip to Cambodia, I met a British ornithologist named Simon Mahood who had spotted an unusual bird on the floodplains around Phnom Penh. Mahood and his colleagues kept looking and listening and eventually they confirmed that the bird was a member of an unrecognised but quite common urban species: the Cambodian tailorbird, one of two bird species found only in Cambodia. | |
Last year, in fact, scientists published descriptions of 18,000 previously unknown species, including a newly recognised species of giant tortoise in the Galápagos Islands, 60 species of damselflies, including one cheekily named after the Pink Floyd album Ummagumma, and a giant sundew, a carnivorous plant, which was identified after a plant enthusiast posted photos of it on Facebook. Researchers described a two-inch-long anglerfish that was unknown to science until it was spotted during marine surveys after the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill. | Last year, in fact, scientists published descriptions of 18,000 previously unknown species, including a newly recognised species of giant tortoise in the Galápagos Islands, 60 species of damselflies, including one cheekily named after the Pink Floyd album Ummagumma, and a giant sundew, a carnivorous plant, which was identified after a plant enthusiast posted photos of it on Facebook. Researchers described a two-inch-long anglerfish that was unknown to science until it was spotted during marine surveys after the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill. |
In May, scientists announced the discovery of seven species of peacock spiders in Australia, and just last Wednesday, researchers in Uruguay and Columbia published a description of a newly recognised genus and species of tarantula, distinguished by its uniquely serrated genitals and named Kankuamo marquezi after the writer Gabriel Garcia Márquez. | In May, scientists announced the discovery of seven species of peacock spiders in Australia, and just last Wednesday, researchers in Uruguay and Columbia published a description of a newly recognised genus and species of tarantula, distinguished by its uniquely serrated genitals and named Kankuamo marquezi after the writer Gabriel Garcia Márquez. |
Why so many new species? It’s partly because more people are looking, often as members of organised surveys such as the recent “bioblitzes” of US national parks. It’s also because previously unexplored places are becoming accessible: development and deforestation in the tropics are, ironically, making some of the world’s most biodiverse areas easier for scientists to get to. Modern tools such as satellite mapping and remotely operated underwater vehicles are allowing researchers to see places they could not otherwise reach, while DNA analysis is showing that animals that look almost identical to one another can be genetically distinct enough to be classified as different species. | Why so many new species? It’s partly because more people are looking, often as members of organised surveys such as the recent “bioblitzes” of US national parks. It’s also because previously unexplored places are becoming accessible: development and deforestation in the tropics are, ironically, making some of the world’s most biodiverse areas easier for scientists to get to. Modern tools such as satellite mapping and remotely operated underwater vehicles are allowing researchers to see places they could not otherwise reach, while DNA analysis is showing that animals that look almost identical to one another can be genetically distinct enough to be classified as different species. |
DNA analyses are even helping discover species hidden in museum collections, such as the waterfall centipede at the Natural History Museum that waited almost 90 years for a proper label. And human activities, as a new paper in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B points out, exert powerful and varied evolutionary pressures; we may be unwittingly creating new species for our descendants to discover. | DNA analyses are even helping discover species hidden in museum collections, such as the waterfall centipede at the Natural History Museum that waited almost 90 years for a proper label. And human activities, as a new paper in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B points out, exert powerful and varied evolutionary pressures; we may be unwittingly creating new species for our descendants to discover. |
But mostly, scientists keep finding species because there are so many left to be found. Researchers have described approximately 1.9m species, but estimates of the number of plant and animal species yet to be discovered range above 10m. Include the rest of the tree of life and the estimates top a trillion. Meanwhile, we are thought to be losing between 1% and 2.2 % of the world’s species every decade, and while that may not sound like much, it’s about 1,000 times the likely background rate of species extinction and just about every metric we have suggests it will increase in coming decades. | But mostly, scientists keep finding species because there are so many left to be found. Researchers have described approximately 1.9m species, but estimates of the number of plant and animal species yet to be discovered range above 10m. Include the rest of the tree of life and the estimates top a trillion. Meanwhile, we are thought to be losing between 1% and 2.2 % of the world’s species every decade, and while that may not sound like much, it’s about 1,000 times the likely background rate of species extinction and just about every metric we have suggests it will increase in coming decades. |
Last month, the Guardian broke the news that the Bramble Cay melomys, the only mammal endemic to Australia’s Great Barrier Reef, has disappeared from the tiny coral cay it once inhabited. The cay has been repeatedly inundated by rising seas and the melomys is thought to be the first mammal driven extinct by human-caused climate change. It is unlikely to be the last. | Last month, the Guardian broke the news that the Bramble Cay melomys, the only mammal endemic to Australia’s Great Barrier Reef, has disappeared from the tiny coral cay it once inhabited. The cay has been repeatedly inundated by rising seas and the melomys is thought to be the first mammal driven extinct by human-caused climate change. It is unlikely to be the last. |
The announcement of a new species, even one as nightmare-inducing as a giant swimming centipede, is something to celebrate and wonder at. There’s a lot of life out there we know nothing about. At the same time, the species we’re losing – some of them undiscovered and unnamed – are unique and can’t be replaced. Discovering a new species isn’t like finding out you have more money in the bank than you thought. It’s like discovering an irreplaceable book in the library – just as you start to smell the smoke. | The announcement of a new species, even one as nightmare-inducing as a giant swimming centipede, is something to celebrate and wonder at. There’s a lot of life out there we know nothing about. At the same time, the species we’re losing – some of them undiscovered and unnamed – are unique and can’t be replaced. Discovering a new species isn’t like finding out you have more money in the bank than you thought. It’s like discovering an irreplaceable book in the library – just as you start to smell the smoke. |
Michelle Nijhuis is a science journalist who writes for the New Yorker and National Geographic among other publications | Michelle Nijhuis is a science journalist who writes for the New Yorker and National Geographic among other publications |
• This article was amended on 6 July 2016 because an earlier version referred to centipedes as insects, rather than arthropods. |
Previous version
1
Next version