This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/05/fbi-hillary-clinton-political-setback-email

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
The FBI gave Hillary Clinton a legal victory – and a political setback The FBI gave Hillary Clinton a legal victory – and a political setback
(about 2 months later)
On Tuesday, FBI director James Comey removed a dark legal cloud from over Hillary Clinton’s head and replaced it with a political one.On Tuesday, FBI director James Comey removed a dark legal cloud from over Hillary Clinton’s head and replaced it with a political one.
Related: FBI director recommends ‘no charges’ after ending Clinton email investigation
Roughly a year after the case of Clinton’s server was referred to the justice department, a preliminary FBI investigation found “reasonable confidence there was not intentional misconduct” on Clinton’s part, and recommended no criminal charges be brought against her.Roughly a year after the case of Clinton’s server was referred to the justice department, a preliminary FBI investigation found “reasonable confidence there was not intentional misconduct” on Clinton’s part, and recommended no criminal charges be brought against her.
The timing of the finding could scarcely have been more dramatic, coming just hours before Clinton’s first joint campaign appearance with Barack Obama.The timing of the finding could scarcely have been more dramatic, coming just hours before Clinton’s first joint campaign appearance with Barack Obama.
“No charges are appropriate in this case,” Comey concluded in what amounts to an unusually public determination ahead of the justice department’s decision.“No charges are appropriate in this case,” Comey concluded in what amounts to an unusually public determination ahead of the justice department’s decision.
Of course this is no usual investigation.Of course this is no usual investigation.
A criminal indictment could derail Clinton’s path to the presidency and help secure a Donald Trump victory in November. But after Tuesday’s announcement, that outcome looks more unlikely than ever.A criminal indictment could derail Clinton’s path to the presidency and help secure a Donald Trump victory in November. But after Tuesday’s announcement, that outcome looks more unlikely than ever.
Federal prosecutors generally seek to avoid having their investigations affect election outcomes, and over at the Justice department where the case is now heading, US attorney general Loretta Lynch has already suggested she will accept the FBI’s findings with regard to the investigation.Federal prosecutors generally seek to avoid having their investigations affect election outcomes, and over at the Justice department where the case is now heading, US attorney general Loretta Lynch has already suggested she will accept the FBI’s findings with regard to the investigation.
Democrats would be foolish to get too complacent, however. If what Clinton received on Tuesday amounts to the beginnings of a legal vindication, she has not received a political one. And she never will.Democrats would be foolish to get too complacent, however. If what Clinton received on Tuesday amounts to the beginnings of a legal vindication, she has not received a political one. And she never will.
After all “distrust” for Clinton isn’t so much a dirty word as a condition of existence. And there are a number of explanations for that other than that she’s inherently untrustworthy or, in Trump’s words: “a world-class liar”.After all “distrust” for Clinton isn’t so much a dirty word as a condition of existence. And there are a number of explanations for that other than that she’s inherently untrustworthy or, in Trump’s words: “a world-class liar”.
Some of it may be attributable to poor optics. (Bill Clinton bumbled his way into the eye of a political storm last week when a private meeting he arranged with Lynch became public – a misstep that reflected poorly not just on him, but on his wife.)Some of it may be attributable to poor optics. (Bill Clinton bumbled his way into the eye of a political storm last week when a private meeting he arranged with Lynch became public – a misstep that reflected poorly not just on him, but on his wife.)
And some of it may be attributable to gender. (A study out of the NYU Stern School of Business found women in positions of power are consistently considered to be less trustworthy than men holding the same positions; the study was recently replicated and reconfirmed by Anderson Cooper. And research from the Barbara Lee Foundation pinpoints a pedestal effect, where when a woman running for office fails to meet a high bar set for her she is disproportionately dinged by the public, more than her male counterparts.)And some of it may be attributable to gender. (A study out of the NYU Stern School of Business found women in positions of power are consistently considered to be less trustworthy than men holding the same positions; the study was recently replicated and reconfirmed by Anderson Cooper. And research from the Barbara Lee Foundation pinpoints a pedestal effect, where when a woman running for office fails to meet a high bar set for her she is disproportionately dinged by the public, more than her male counterparts.)
But it’s also a function of how long she and her husband have been around in politics and, by extension, subject to partisan-fueled attacks.But it’s also a function of how long she and her husband have been around in politics and, by extension, subject to partisan-fueled attacks.
In the 1990s there was Whitewater. Though the Clintons were never found guilty of any criminal misconduct, the investigator did find a political smoking gun by the name of Monica Lewinsky. Never mind that it wasn’t even Hillary’s misstep, she was accused of everything from covering up for her husband to enabling his bad behavior.In the 1990s there was Whitewater. Though the Clintons were never found guilty of any criminal misconduct, the investigator did find a political smoking gun by the name of Monica Lewinsky. Never mind that it wasn’t even Hillary’s misstep, she was accused of everything from covering up for her husband to enabling his bad behavior.
When it finally looked like the political dust storm around her had cleared (Bill had left the scene and she’d spent a decade burnishing her own political credentials), Benghazi happened. Since then Washington has dedicated eight Congressional panels and $23m dollars looking into any criminal wrongdoing. This time the smoking gun to emerge was her use of a private email server while at the state department.When it finally looked like the political dust storm around her had cleared (Bill had left the scene and she’d spent a decade burnishing her own political credentials), Benghazi happened. Since then Washington has dedicated eight Congressional panels and $23m dollars looking into any criminal wrongdoing. This time the smoking gun to emerge was her use of a private email server while at the state department.
Now once again, it looks like Clinton is poised to be cleared of any legal wrongdoing but Democrats breathing a sigh of relief today would do well to hold their breath.Now once again, it looks like Clinton is poised to be cleared of any legal wrongdoing but Democrats breathing a sigh of relief today would do well to hold their breath.
For even as Comey helped clear the way for Clinton to be legally exonerated, he rebuked her for being “extremely careless” in using a private email server for classified information, adding that lesser government officials might have faced administrative sanction.For even as Comey helped clear the way for Clinton to be legally exonerated, he rebuked her for being “extremely careless” in using a private email server for classified information, adding that lesser government officials might have faced administrative sanction.
The case ultimately comes down to a matter of intent, something famously difficult to prove. Did Clinton intentionally send out or receive any sensitive information? The FBI’s now on the record saying no, but Clinton’s enemies will say yes. And that means the political witch hunts will begin anew.The case ultimately comes down to a matter of intent, something famously difficult to prove. Did Clinton intentionally send out or receive any sensitive information? The FBI’s now on the record saying no, but Clinton’s enemies will say yes. And that means the political witch hunts will begin anew.
More importantly, in underscoring her negligence today, investigators have already given Donald Trump the the Republican party at large the ammunition they need to perpetuate the cloud of distrust around her. In that way, Republican operatives have already accomplished their missionMore importantly, in underscoring her negligence today, investigators have already given Donald Trump the the Republican party at large the ammunition they need to perpetuate the cloud of distrust around her. In that way, Republican operatives have already accomplished their mission