This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-suffolk-36747845
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Ipswich Town loses bid to sue police over charges | Ipswich Town loses bid to sue police over charges |
(about 4 hours later) | |
Ipswich Town has failed in its court action over who should pay for policing outside its Portman Road stadium on match days. | Ipswich Town has failed in its court action over who should pay for policing outside its Portman Road stadium on match days. |
The club sued Suffolk Police for £200,000, claiming it was "unlawfully" charged for policing in 2008-2013. | The club sued Suffolk Police for £200,000, claiming it was "unlawfully" charged for policing in 2008-2013. |
It said the force should not have charged it for keeping order on the streets around the ground. | It said the force should not have charged it for keeping order on the streets around the ground. |
The High Court said Suffolk Police was entitled in law to recover the costs of policing the ground outside the club. | The High Court said Suffolk Police was entitled in law to recover the costs of policing the ground outside the club. |
Nick De Marco, for the club, told the High Court it was paying for "ordinary policing on the public highway". | Nick De Marco, for the club, told the High Court it was paying for "ordinary policing on the public highway". |
The club added that the force was not entitled to charge for the provision of "special police services" on these occasions. | The club added that the force was not entitled to charge for the provision of "special police services" on these occasions. |
More on this and other Suffolk stories | |
However, Suffolk Police countered with a claim that the club owed it £96,000 in unpaid invoices for the policing of the public highway on Portman Road and Sir Alf Ramsey Way, where the gates and turnstiles are situated, and which are the subject of a traffic control order by the local authority. | However, Suffolk Police countered with a claim that the club owed it £96,000 in unpaid invoices for the policing of the public highway on Portman Road and Sir Alf Ramsey Way, where the gates and turnstiles are situated, and which are the subject of a traffic control order by the local authority. |
It said that the test of whether the land was "owned, leased or controlled" was the correct one for determining whether it was carrying out special police services and that the club controlled the public highway. | It said that the test of whether the land was "owned, leased or controlled" was the correct one for determining whether it was carrying out special police services and that the club controlled the public highway. |
Ipswich Town said the correct test was whether policing was conducted on public, as opposed to private, land and - in any case - it did not "control" the public highway. | Ipswich Town said the correct test was whether policing was conducted on public, as opposed to private, land and - in any case - it did not "control" the public highway. |
On Friday, at London's High Court, after a hearing which was only concerned with liability, the judge Mr Justice Green said that, from the facts, the services provided by the police within the traffic control order area amounted to special police services and they were entitled to impose charges. | On Friday, at London's High Court, after a hearing which was only concerned with liability, the judge Mr Justice Green said that, from the facts, the services provided by the police within the traffic control order area amounted to special police services and they were entitled to impose charges. |
Any application to appeal and the issue of the amount payable will be heard at a later date. | Any application to appeal and the issue of the amount payable will be heard at a later date. |
The case comes three years after West Yorkshire Police lost its appeal over payment for policing at Leeds United's Elland Road ground. | The case comes three years after West Yorkshire Police lost its appeal over payment for policing at Leeds United's Elland Road ground. |
Previous version
1
Next version