This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-36771749
The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
Beijing South China Sea claims rejected by court | Beijing South China Sea claims rejected by court |
(35 minutes later) | |
An international tribunal has ruled against Chinese claims to rights in the South China Sea, backing a case brought by the Philippines. | |
The Permanent Court of Arbitration said there was no evidence that China had historically exercised exclusive control over the waters or resources. | The Permanent Court of Arbitration said there was no evidence that China had historically exercised exclusive control over the waters or resources. |
China called the ruling "ill-founded" and says it will not be bound by it. | China called the ruling "ill-founded" and says it will not be bound by it. |
China claims almost all of the South China Sea, including reefs and islands also claimed by others. | China claims almost all of the South China Sea, including reefs and islands also claimed by others. |
The tribunal in The Hague said China had violated the Philippines' sovereign rights. It also said China had caused "severe harm to the coral reef environment" by building artificial islands. | The tribunal in The Hague said China had violated the Philippines' sovereign rights. It also said China had caused "severe harm to the coral reef environment" by building artificial islands. |
The ruling came from an arbitration tribunal under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which both countries have signed. | The ruling came from an arbitration tribunal under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which both countries have signed. |
The ruling is binding but the tribunal, the Permanent Court of Arbitration, has no powers of enforcement. | The ruling is binding but the tribunal, the Permanent Court of Arbitration, has no powers of enforcement. |
The US sent an aircraft carrier and fighter jets to the region ahead of the ruling, prompting an angry editorial in the Global Times, a strongly nationalist state-run newspaper, calling for the US to prepare for "military confrontation". | The US sent an aircraft carrier and fighter jets to the region ahead of the ruling, prompting an angry editorial in the Global Times, a strongly nationalist state-run newspaper, calling for the US to prepare for "military confrontation". |
Meanwhile, the Chinese Navy has been carrying out exercises near the disputed Paracel islands. | Meanwhile, the Chinese Navy has been carrying out exercises near the disputed Paracel islands. |
Philippe Sands, a lawyer for the Philippines in the case, said it was a "clear and unanimous judgement that upholds the rule of law and the rights claimed by the Philippines". | Philippe Sands, a lawyer for the Philippines in the case, said it was a "clear and unanimous judgement that upholds the rule of law and the rights claimed by the Philippines". |
He called it a "definitive ruling on which all states can place reliance". | He called it a "definitive ruling on which all states can place reliance". |
However, the Chinese state news agency Xinhua said that "as the panel has no jurisdiction, its decision is naturally null and void". | However, the Chinese state news agency Xinhua said that "as the panel has no jurisdiction, its decision is naturally null and void". |
The tribunal was ruling on seven of 15 points brought by the Philippines. Among the key findings were: | The tribunal was ruling on seven of 15 points brought by the Philippines. Among the key findings were: |
Rocks, reefs or islands - what is the difference? | Rocks, reefs or islands - what is the difference? |