This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/jul/13/jill-meagher-murderer-adrian-bayleys-jail-term-cut-by-three-years-on-appeal

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Jill Meagher murderer Adrian Bayley's jail term cut by three years on appeal Jill Meagher murderer Adrian Bayley's jail term cut by three years on appeal
(about 1 month later)
Jill Meagher’s killer and serial Victorian rapist, Adrian Ernest Bayley, has had three years cut off his jail term after a conviction for raping a sex worker in 2000 was overturned.Jill Meagher’s killer and serial Victorian rapist, Adrian Ernest Bayley, has had three years cut off his jail term after a conviction for raping a sex worker in 2000 was overturned.
Bayley appealed two rape convictions and sentences that increased his non-parole period to 43 years.Bayley appealed two rape convictions and sentences that increased his non-parole period to 43 years.
Victorian court of appeal judges Marilyn Warren, Mark Weinberg and Phillip Priest on Wednesday reduced his sentence to 40 years and acquitted him of one rape conviction – but dismissed his appeal against the other conviction.Victorian court of appeal judges Marilyn Warren, Mark Weinberg and Phillip Priest on Wednesday reduced his sentence to 40 years and acquitted him of one rape conviction – but dismissed his appeal against the other conviction.
Related: Jill Meagher murder could have been prevented, says coroner
Bayley had appealed two rape convictions for attacks on women in St Kilda in 2000 and 2012.Bayley had appealed two rape convictions for attacks on women in St Kilda in 2000 and 2012.
At a hearing in March, Bayley’s barrister, Saul Holt QC, said there were weaknesses in evidence linked to identification in the trial over the 2000 rape of a sex worker in St Kilda.At a hearing in March, Bayley’s barrister, Saul Holt QC, said there were weaknesses in evidence linked to identification in the trial over the 2000 rape of a sex worker in St Kilda.
The court of appeal found the identification evidence should have been excluded from Bayley’s trial because it had “virtually no probative value”.The court of appeal found the identification evidence should have been excluded from Bayley’s trial because it had “virtually no probative value”.
“Without the identification evidence, there was no evidence upon which a jury could find Bayley guilty,” the judges said.“Without the identification evidence, there was no evidence upon which a jury could find Bayley guilty,” the judges said.
Bayley’s conviction over the 2000 rape was one of three rape trials that had increased the non-parole period on his life sentence from 35 years to 43 years.Bayley’s conviction over the 2000 rape was one of three rape trials that had increased the non-parole period on his life sentence from 35 years to 43 years.
The 44-year-old received the life sentence for the 2012 rape and murder of Meagher.The 44-year-old received the life sentence for the 2012 rape and murder of Meagher.
Related: Irish documentary takes aim at parole system after Jill Meagher murder
Having quashed the 2000 rape conviction, the court of appeal fixed a new non-parole period of 40 years.Having quashed the 2000 rape conviction, the court of appeal fixed a new non-parole period of 40 years.
The judges dismissed Bayley’s appeal against his conviction over the 2012 rape of a Dutch backpacker on the grounds that telephone evidence was flawed.The judges dismissed Bayley’s appeal against his conviction over the 2012 rape of a Dutch backpacker on the grounds that telephone evidence was flawed.
The court of appeal rejected this argument and found the telephone records were clearly relevant.The court of appeal rejected this argument and found the telephone records were clearly relevant.
In re-sentencing Bayley, the judges said his offending was “utterly abhorrent” and noted his long history of sexual assaults.In re-sentencing Bayley, the judges said his offending was “utterly abhorrent” and noted his long history of sexual assaults.
“The history left little room for optimism concerning his prospects for rehabilitation,” they wrote.“The history left little room for optimism concerning his prospects for rehabilitation,” they wrote.