This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36829391

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Newcastle Primark kidnap teenagers sentenced Newcastle Primark kidnap teenagers sentenced
(35 minutes later)
Two girls who kidnapped a toddler from a Primark store have been sentenced to three years four months' detention. Two girls who kidnapped a toddler from a Primark store have been sentenced to three years three months' detention.
The two-year-old was found an hour and 45 minutes later after being tracked via CCTV cameras to a park about three miles away from the Newcastle store.The two-year-old was found an hour and 45 minutes later after being tracked via CCTV cameras to a park about three miles away from the Newcastle store.
The girls, aged 13 and 14, admitted kidnap at an earlier hearing.The girls, aged 13 and 14, admitted kidnap at an earlier hearing.
Sentencing, the judge at Newcastle Crown Court said although the child came to "no actual harm", there was intent, planning and enticement. Sentencing them, the judge at Newcastle Crown Court said although the child came to "no actual harm", there had been intent, planning and enticement.
Read more about this story on BBC Local Live
Just before the kidnap, in April, the teenagers, from Tyneside, had shoplifted dummies, baby milk and a bottle.
They were initially charged with kidnap with the intention of committing a sexual offence but this was dropped after the prosecution accepted a plea to the alternative charge of kidnap.
Internet searches on a tablet belonging to the younger girl included "rape", "people getting raped", "young people getting raped", "poor little thing getting kidnapped and raped".
'Psychological harm'
Mr Justice Globe said the two girls put forward different accounts of the incident, but neither had explained to his satisfaction what actually happened.
He said their accounts "produce more questions than answers", and rejected the proposition they had taken the child "for no reason... with no specific intent".
"I bear in mind no physical harm was caused," he said.
"However, the extensive psychological harm to her mother was devastating. She won't let her daughter out if her sight and won't let her go to nursery,"
He added that it was clear that some aspect of physical or sexual harm or exploitation would have been carried out.
"It was the true reason as to why she was taken. Her [the mother's] fears are well founded."