This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/22/world/africa/oscar-pistorius-sentence.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
South African Prosecutors Seek Longer Prison Term for Oscar Pistorius Sentence for Oscar Pistorius Challenged by South African Prosecutors
(about 5 hours later)
JOHANNESBURG — South African prosecutors said on Thursday that they would seek a longer prison term for Oscar Pistorius, the double-amputee sprinter convicted of murdering his girlfriend, harshly criticizing a six-year sentence handed down two weeks ago as “shockingly too lenient.”JOHANNESBURG — South African prosecutors said on Thursday that they would seek a longer prison term for Oscar Pistorius, the double-amputee sprinter convicted of murdering his girlfriend, harshly criticizing a six-year sentence handed down two weeks ago as “shockingly too lenient.”
The National Prosecuting Authority said it would seek to appeal the ruling by Judge Thokozile Matilda Masipa of the High Court in Pretoria, who cited “mitigating” factors in giving Mr. Pistorius a sentence far shorter than the 15-year minimum sought by prosecutors.The National Prosecuting Authority said it would seek to appeal the ruling by Judge Thokozile Matilda Masipa of the High Court in Pretoria, who cited “mitigating” factors in giving Mr. Pistorius a sentence far shorter than the 15-year minimum sought by prosecutors.
Her ruling also surprised most South African legal experts, who had predicted that Mr. Pistorius would be given at least 10 years in prison.Her ruling also surprised most South African legal experts, who had predicted that Mr. Pistorius would be given at least 10 years in prison.
South African law calls for Judge Masipa to now decide whether to allow prosecutors to appeal her ruling at the Supreme Court of Appeal. If she refuses, prosecutors can then directly petition the appeals court.South African law calls for Judge Masipa to now decide whether to allow prosecutors to appeal her ruling at the Supreme Court of Appeal. If she refuses, prosecutors can then directly petition the appeals court.
In delivering the six-year sentence, Judge Masipa noted that Mr. Pistorius had shown genuine remorse, was a first-time offender and was a good candidate for reform. Clearly pleased with the sentence, Mr. Pistorius’s lawyers said immediately that they would not contest it.In delivering the six-year sentence, Judge Masipa noted that Mr. Pistorius had shown genuine remorse, was a first-time offender and was a good candidate for reform. Clearly pleased with the sentence, Mr. Pistorius’s lawyers said immediately that they would not contest it.
The ruling marked the second time that Judge Masipa had surprised legal experts, as well as the wider public in South Africa, with a judgment regarded by many as overly sympathetic to Mr. Pistorius.The ruling marked the second time that Judge Masipa had surprised legal experts, as well as the wider public in South Africa, with a judgment regarded by many as overly sympathetic to Mr. Pistorius.
In 2014, she initially found him guilty of manslaughter in the killing of his girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp, inside his home a year earlier, and she sentenced him to five years in prison.In 2014, she initially found him guilty of manslaughter in the killing of his girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp, inside his home a year earlier, and she sentenced him to five years in prison.
After prosecutors appealed, the appeals court concluded that Judge Masipa had erred in her ruling and convicted Mr. Pistorius of murder. The appeals court then ordered Judge Masipa to give Mr. Pistorius a new sentence.After prosecutors appealed, the appeals court concluded that Judge Masipa had erred in her ruling and convicted Mr. Pistorius of murder. The appeals court then ordered Judge Masipa to give Mr. Pistorius a new sentence.