This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/26/high-court-to-hear-legal-case-against-labour-leadership-ballot-decision-jeremy-corbyn

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
High court to hear legal case against Labour leadership ballot decision Labour could reopen leadership nominations if anti-Corbyn court bid succeeds
(about 1 hour later)
A legal action aimed at overturning the Labour party’s decision to guarantee Jeremy Corbyn a place on the leadership ballot is due to get under way. Labour is likely to reopen nominations for its leadership contest if a judge overturns last week’s decision to automatically place Jeremy Corbyn on the ballot in a legal challenge to be heard at the high court.
Labour donor Michael Foster, a former parliamentary candidate, is bringing the claim at London’s high court against the party’s general secretary, Iain McNicol, who is being sued in a representative capacity, and Corbyn. Lawyers working for the party have suggested the leader would be given the chance to collect 51 names from MPs and MEPs if the legal challenge by millionaire donor by Michael Foster – to be heard on Tuesday – succeeds.
The case, to be heard on Tuesday by Mr Justice Foskett, follows the decision of Labour’s national executive committee (NEC) that the incumbent leader should automatically be included in the contest. One source said that anything else would amount to a “coronation of Owen Smith”, Corbyn’s rival for the leadership, that would infuriate the current leader’s supporters.
Ballot papers will start to be sent out on 22 August and the result will be announced in Liverpool on 24 September, a day before the Labour conference kicks off in the city.Ballot papers will start to be sent out on 22 August and the result will be announced in Liverpool on 24 September, a day before the Labour conference kicks off in the city.
NEC members argued over legal advice for six hours to decide whether Corbyn needed the backing of 20% of Labour MPs and MEPs – 51 nominations – to make it on to the ballot paper after opposing sides insisted the party rule book backed their case. NEC members had argued over legal advice for six hours to decide whether Corbyn needed the backing of 20% of Labour MPs and MEPs – 51 nominations – to make it on to the ballot paper after opposing sides insisted the party rule book backed their case.
Foster wants to reverse the NEC’s decision and is seeking a declaration that, under Labour party rules, Corbyn must obtain the requisite number of nominations before his name can appear on the ballot. Foster wants to reverse the NEC’s decision and is seeking a declaration that, under Labour party rules, Corbyn must obtain the requisite number of nominations before his name can appear on the ballot
Foster, a former parliamentary candidate, is bringing the claim at London’s high court in front of Mr Justice Foskett against the party’s general secretary, Iain McNicol, who is being sued in a representative capacity.
McNicol announced a leadership election on 11 July after the Wallasey MP Angela Eagle obtained the necessary number of nominations.McNicol announced a leadership election on 11 July after the Wallasey MP Angela Eagle obtained the necessary number of nominations.
Eagle withdrew from the race a week ago to back Owen Smith as a “unity candidate” against Corbyn, who became leader in September last year. Eagle withdrew from the race a week ago to back Smith as a “unity candidate” against Corbyn, who became leader in September last year.
Smith, who was elected MP for Pontypridd in 2010 and later promoted to shadow work and pensions secretary, was one of many shadow cabinet members to resign over Corbyn’s leadership.Smith, who was elected MP for Pontypridd in 2010 and later promoted to shadow work and pensions secretary, was one of many shadow cabinet members to resign over Corbyn’s leadership.
Last week, high court master Victoria McCloud granted Corbyn’s request to become a party in the action, saying that he personally faced “jeopardy” in the election and his interest in the litigation was significantly different to the general body of members represented by McNicol. Last week, high court master Victoria McCloud granted Corbyn’s request to become a party in the action, saying that he personally faced “jeopardy” in the election and his interest in the litigation was significantly different to the general body of members represented by McNicol. A spokesman for Corbyn said there are “no plans’’ for him to attend court on Tuesday.
Related: Labour sued by members barred from leadership voteRelated: Labour sued by members barred from leadership vote
She said that much turned on the outcome of the election as it would determine a crucial constitutional role in the UK.She said that much turned on the outcome of the election as it would determine a crucial constitutional role in the UK.
Separately, Labour is being sued by a group of its members over the decision to exclude 130,000 people who joined the party after 12 January from being able to vote in its leadership contest.Separately, Labour is being sued by a group of its members over the decision to exclude 130,000 people who joined the party after 12 January from being able to vote in its leadership contest.
Harrison Grant, a London law firm, issued proceedings against Labour and McNicol on behalf of the members, who are crowdfunding to pay for the action.Harrison Grant, a London law firm, issued proceedings against Labour and McNicol on behalf of the members, who are crowdfunding to pay for the action.
In a statement, the group said: “We have called on the party to reconsider its decision, but it has not proven forthcoming. We believe the only way we can retrieve our rights is by taking the party to court.”In a statement, the group said: “We have called on the party to reconsider its decision, but it has not proven forthcoming. We believe the only way we can retrieve our rights is by taking the party to court.”