This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-democratic-nominee.html

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Hillary Clinton Asks Not for Trust, but for Faith in Her Competence Hillary Clinton Asks Not for Trust, but for Faith in Her Competence
(about 2 hours later)
PHILADELPHIA — The trust of the American electorate remains out of her reach. Its affections still elude her.PHILADELPHIA — The trust of the American electorate remains out of her reach. Its affections still elude her.
So after decades in public life, Hillary Clinton grasped for something less lofty and far more attainable here on Thursday night: an unquestioned acknowledgment of her readiness for the job. So after 40 years in public life, Hillary Clinton grasped for something less lofty and far more attainable here on Thursday night: an unquestioned acknowledgment of her readiness for the job.
The most consequential speech of her campaign, and of her career, seemed to contain an unspoken concession: By now it is all but impossible for Mrs. Clinton to shake herself loose from the elaborate, decades-old scaffold of assumptions — built up by scandal and bolted in place by her enemies — that her motives are impure.The most consequential speech of her campaign, and of her career, seemed to contain an unspoken concession: By now it is all but impossible for Mrs. Clinton to shake herself loose from the elaborate, decades-old scaffold of assumptions — built up by scandal and bolted in place by her enemies — that her motives are impure.
But it offered a firm and extensive counterargument: A succession of senior government positions, deep dives in the intricacies of policy and high-stakes international negotiations have prepared her for the presidency in ways that Donald J. Trump cannot possibly match.But it offered a firm and extensive counterargument: A succession of senior government positions, deep dives in the intricacies of policy and high-stakes international negotiations have prepared her for the presidency in ways that Donald J. Trump cannot possibly match.
“It’s true,” she said, proudly embracing her reputation for jargon-laden 10-point plans and dog-eared briefing books. “I sweat the details of policy.”“It’s true,” she said, proudly embracing her reputation for jargon-laden 10-point plans and dog-eared briefing books. “I sweat the details of policy.”
“Because it’s not just a detail if it’s your kid — if it’s your family. It’s a big deal. And it should be a big deal to your president.”“Because it’s not just a detail if it’s your kid — if it’s your family. It’s a big deal. And it should be a big deal to your president.”
Besieged by lingering doubts about her honesty, Mrs. Clinton made the case for a different kind of trust onstage in Philadelphia: not the textbook definition, but a more pragmatic faith in her judgment, experience, temperament and priorities.Besieged by lingering doubts about her honesty, Mrs. Clinton made the case for a different kind of trust onstage in Philadelphia: not the textbook definition, but a more pragmatic faith in her judgment, experience, temperament and priorities.
She asked voters to trust her instincts, reciting an old saying she learned in the Methodist Church.She asked voters to trust her instincts, reciting an old saying she learned in the Methodist Church.
“Do all the good you can, for all the people you can, in all the ways you can, as long as ever you can,” she said.“Do all the good you can, for all the people you can, in all the ways you can, as long as ever you can,” she said.
She asked them to trust in her compassion. “To drive real progress, you have to change both hearts and laws,” she said. “You need both understanding and action.” She asked them to trust in her own resilience. “More than a few times, I’ve had to pick myself up and get back in the game.”She asked them to trust in her compassion. “To drive real progress, you have to change both hearts and laws,” she said. “You need both understanding and action.” She asked them to trust in her own resilience. “More than a few times, I’ve had to pick myself up and get back in the game.”
It was a speech that embraced her undeniable strengths in a topsy-turvy campaign against a wily and unpredictable rival: She had the thick skin and pressure-tested personality to be commander in chief. Her opponent, she said over and over, did not.It was a speech that embraced her undeniable strengths in a topsy-turvy campaign against a wily and unpredictable rival: She had the thick skin and pressure-tested personality to be commander in chief. Her opponent, she said over and over, did not.
“Donald Trump can’t even handle the rough-and-tumble of a presidential campaign,” Mrs. Clinton said. “He loses his cool at the slightest provocation.”“Donald Trump can’t even handle the rough-and-tumble of a presidential campaign,” Mrs. Clinton said. “He loses his cool at the slightest provocation.”
That message of maturity, Democratic and Republican campaign operatives said, could prove decisive.That message of maturity, Democratic and Republican campaign operatives said, could prove decisive.
“For those voters on the bubble,” said David Axelrod, a former strategist and adviser to President Obama, “I think that is a tiebreaker in this election.”“For those voters on the bubble,” said David Axelrod, a former strategist and adviser to President Obama, “I think that is a tiebreaker in this election.”
But in a conspicuous absence, Mrs. Clinton chose not to touch on her biggest vulnerability: the belief, widely held by voters, that she is a calculating and dishonest figure.But in a conspicuous absence, Mrs. Clinton chose not to touch on her biggest vulnerability: the belief, widely held by voters, that she is a calculating and dishonest figure.
Even her closest allies acknowledge is a perilous reputation she may never dispel. “It’s a tricky piece of business, how she addresses this,” Mr. Axelrod said. “There is no set of words that can entirely resolve these issues.”Even her closest allies acknowledge is a perilous reputation she may never dispel. “It’s a tricky piece of business, how she addresses this,” Mr. Axelrod said. “There is no set of words that can entirely resolve these issues.”
Poll after poll shows that a startlingly wide cross-section of voters simply do not trust her: 67 percent of registered voters in a New York Times/CBS News poll this month, many of them wary of her inconsistent explanations for using a private email server when she was secretary of state.Poll after poll shows that a startlingly wide cross-section of voters simply do not trust her: 67 percent of registered voters in a New York Times/CBS News poll this month, many of them wary of her inconsistent explanations for using a private email server when she was secretary of state.
So Mrs. Clinton is asking for trust of a different kind.So Mrs. Clinton is asking for trust of a different kind.
The strategy rests on the proposition that voters are capable, in the words of Stuart Stevens, a longtime Republican strategist, “of holding contradictory thoughts in balance.”The strategy rests on the proposition that voters are capable, in the words of Stuart Stevens, a longtime Republican strategist, “of holding contradictory thoughts in balance.”
“With her, you can have real doubts about her, but you can still trust her to be a president,” he said.“With her, you can have real doubts about her, but you can still trust her to be a president,” he said.
A persuasive role model: her husband.A persuasive role model: her husband.
Bill Clinton successfully confronted a similar dilemma in 1992, when he asked voters to distinguish breaches of trust in his personal life from the faith he asked them to place in him as their next president. Trust in my vision for the country, he said, no matter what you think of my marital infidelity.Bill Clinton successfully confronted a similar dilemma in 1992, when he asked voters to distinguish breaches of trust in his personal life from the faith he asked them to place in him as their next president. Trust in my vision for the country, he said, no matter what you think of my marital infidelity.
At his convention 24 years ago, Mr. Clinton faced down his damaged reputation with striking directness, quoting a young voter who had approached him at a campaign event and bluntly asked him, “Why should I trust you?”At his convention 24 years ago, Mr. Clinton faced down his damaged reputation with striking directness, quoting a young voter who had approached him at a campaign event and bluntly asked him, “Why should I trust you?”
His response then was much like his wife’s is today: to persuade voters that he could be trusted, above all, to battle tirelessly on their behalf.His response then was much like his wife’s is today: to persuade voters that he could be trusted, above all, to battle tirelessly on their behalf.
On Thursday, Mrs. Clinton vowed to be a champion of the overlooked and overworked. “I will carry all of your voices and stories with me to the White House,” she said, in an echo of her husband’s famously empathetic style.On Thursday, Mrs. Clinton vowed to be a champion of the overlooked and overworked. “I will carry all of your voices and stories with me to the White House,” she said, in an echo of her husband’s famously empathetic style.
“What the campaign wants,” said Paul Begala, Mr. Clinton’s chief strategist in 1992, “is for people to move away from this position that she is fundamentally dishonest, to ‘She made a mistake there, but I trust her to fight for me.’ ”“What the campaign wants,” said Paul Begala, Mr. Clinton’s chief strategist in 1992, “is for people to move away from this position that she is fundamentally dishonest, to ‘She made a mistake there, but I trust her to fight for me.’ ”
Mrs. Clinton had ample help in Philadelphia. Throughout the Democratic convention, a procession of big-name speakers reached, one by one, for ways to attest to her trustworthiness, often in highly personal terms, and beseeched voters who are skeptical of Mrs. Clinton to take them at their word.Mrs. Clinton had ample help in Philadelphia. Throughout the Democratic convention, a procession of big-name speakers reached, one by one, for ways to attest to her trustworthiness, often in highly personal terms, and beseeched voters who are skeptical of Mrs. Clinton to take them at their word.
Michelle Obama vouched for her as a mother of two young women. “I trust Hillary Clinton to lead this country,” Mrs. Obama said, “because I’ve seen her lifelong devotion to our nation’s children, not just her own daughter, who she has raised to perfection.”Michelle Obama vouched for her as a mother of two young women. “I trust Hillary Clinton to lead this country,” Mrs. Obama said, “because I’ve seen her lifelong devotion to our nation’s children, not just her own daughter, who she has raised to perfection.”
Senator Tim Kaine, Mrs. Clinton’s running mate, testified as the father of a Marine. “I trust Hillary Clinton with our son’s life,” he said.Senator Tim Kaine, Mrs. Clinton’s running mate, testified as the father of a Marine. “I trust Hillary Clinton with our son’s life,” he said.
And a retired general, John Allen, stood up for her as a former commander of United States military forces in Afghanistan. “We trust in her judgment,” he said on Thursday night, surrounded by fellow generals, admirals and veterans. “We know that she, as no other, knows how to use all instruments of American power, not just the military, to keep us all safe and free.”And a retired general, John Allen, stood up for her as a former commander of United States military forces in Afghanistan. “We trust in her judgment,” he said on Thursday night, surrounded by fellow generals, admirals and veterans. “We know that she, as no other, knows how to use all instruments of American power, not just the military, to keep us all safe and free.”
The message was not subtle. And that was deliberate.The message was not subtle. And that was deliberate.
John D. Podesta, the chairman of Mrs. Clinton’s campaign, said in an interview that the aim was to portray her as someone who, when politics gives way to the serious business of governing, can be counted on. “A person who, when the doors close and the cameras are off, people trust,” he said.John D. Podesta, the chairman of Mrs. Clinton’s campaign, said in an interview that the aim was to portray her as someone who, when politics gives way to the serious business of governing, can be counted on. “A person who, when the doors close and the cameras are off, people trust,” he said.
For most presidential candidates, trust is not a flaw to be fixed, but a quality to exploit or a rhetorical device to deploy.For most presidential candidates, trust is not a flaw to be fixed, but a quality to exploit or a rhetorical device to deploy.
For George W. Bush, who lacked gravitas and a deep résumé when he sought the presidency, it was a way to recast inexperience as humility. “If you give me your trust,” he said at his convention in 2000, “I will honor it.”For George W. Bush, who lacked gravitas and a deep résumé when he sought the presidency, it was a way to recast inexperience as humility. “If you give me your trust,” he said at his convention in 2000, “I will honor it.”
For Mitt Romney, whose vast wealth and business tactics risked alienating voters, it was a chance to see him in a new, less menacing light. He was, he told his convention in 2012, “deeply moved by the trust you have placed in me.”For Mitt Romney, whose vast wealth and business tactics risked alienating voters, it was a chance to see him in a new, less menacing light. He was, he told his convention in 2012, “deeply moved by the trust you have placed in me.”
Those men asked the country to trust in them — just as Mr. Trump has urged voters to trust him alone to fix what ails the nation.Those men asked the country to trust in them — just as Mr. Trump has urged voters to trust him alone to fix what ails the nation.
On Thursday night, Mrs. Clinton rejected that argument, promising, “We will fix it together.”On Thursday night, Mrs. Clinton rejected that argument, promising, “We will fix it together.”
Her message: Do not trust her alone. Trust “us.”Her message: Do not trust her alone. Trust “us.”