This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/austria-germany-10-year-court-battle-overcharged-250-spa-swimming-pool-berchtesgaden-a7209286.html
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Austrian man wins 10-year court battle after being overcharged €2.50 to go to swimming pool | Austrian man wins 10-year court battle after being overcharged €2.50 to go to swimming pool |
(about 1 hour later) | |
An Austrian man has triumphed in a decade-long legal battle at Germany’s highest constitutional court, winning a case in which he claimed he was overcharged entry to a spa swimming pool by €2.50 (£2.14). | |
The incident occurred at a spa in Berchtesgaden in the German Bavarian Alps, The Local reports. | The incident occurred at a spa in Berchtesgaden in the German Bavarian Alps, The Local reports. |
The spa had reportedly introduced a special offer that gave a third off the entry price for visitors coming from five particular German municipalities. | The spa had reportedly introduced a special offer that gave a third off the entry price for visitors coming from five particular German municipalities. |
But the man, who had travelled from Salzburg in Austria, not from one of the municipalities covered in the special offer, was told he would have to pay the full charge – €2.50 more. | |
Disgruntled at not being treated equally, the man took the case to court, initially having his claim rejected. | Disgruntled at not being treated equally, the man took the case to court, initially having his claim rejected. |
But over ten years, the Austrian took his case all the way up to Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court – the highest in the country – arguing that he should not have had to pay the extra €2.50 to access the spa pool. | |
After a decade arguing his case, the Federal Constitutional Court has ruled in the man’s favour. | After a decade arguing his case, the Federal Constitutional Court has ruled in the man’s favour. |
The court said that the rejection of his claim by lower courts could not be understood from “any perspective”, according to The Local. | The court said that the rejection of his claim by lower courts could not be understood from “any perspective”, according to The Local. |
In a statement issued on Tuesday, the court said although a business can favour locals, they need a good reason to do so. | In a statement issued on Tuesday, the court said although a business can favour locals, they need a good reason to do so. |
As the pool was apparently attempting to attract visitors from far away, they did not have the right to exclude the Austrian man from the €2.50 discount deal. | As the pool was apparently attempting to attract visitors from far away, they did not have the right to exclude the Austrian man from the €2.50 discount deal. |
Previous version
1
Next version