This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/aug/30/more-than-wildlife-is-under-threat-by-cuts
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| More than wildlife is under threat by cuts | |
| (35 minutes later) | |
| Your report (Farming rethink demanded as wildlife suffers, 27 August), mentioning the fact that the “amount of time given by conservation volunteers has fallen”, reveals a hidden effect of austerity hurting people as much as the planet. In the first round of austerity cuts one nearby local authority reduced its grants to environmental bodies. For my learning-disabled son the budget cut meant the conservation volunteers’ organisation could no longer offer the free pick-up service to enable people from the surrounding areas to reach the site where they worked, often way beyond the reach of public transport. For my son it meant a loss of his “job”, which he was very proud of. He also lost the companionship of the people he’d worked alongside for several years, the chance to work as an equal with disabled and non-disabled people from all walks of life, and the opportunity to learn new skills. Modern farming methods no doubt have caused the main damage to our wildlife, but austerity has played its part by limiting attempts at remediation by environmental groups.Pat SanchezLittleborough, Lancashire | Your report (Farming rethink demanded as wildlife suffers, 27 August), mentioning the fact that the “amount of time given by conservation volunteers has fallen”, reveals a hidden effect of austerity hurting people as much as the planet. In the first round of austerity cuts one nearby local authority reduced its grants to environmental bodies. For my learning-disabled son the budget cut meant the conservation volunteers’ organisation could no longer offer the free pick-up service to enable people from the surrounding areas to reach the site where they worked, often way beyond the reach of public transport. For my son it meant a loss of his “job”, which he was very proud of. He also lost the companionship of the people he’d worked alongside for several years, the chance to work as an equal with disabled and non-disabled people from all walks of life, and the opportunity to learn new skills. Modern farming methods no doubt have caused the main damage to our wildlife, but austerity has played its part by limiting attempts at remediation by environmental groups.Pat SanchezLittleborough, Lancashire |
| • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com | • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com |