This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/sep/09/second-person-challenges-cps-decision-not-to-charge-sir-cliff-richard
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
Second person challenges CPS decision not to charge Sir Cliff Richard | Second person challenges CPS decision not to charge Sir Cliff Richard |
(35 minutes later) | |
A second person has challenged the decision not to bring sexual assault charges against Sir Cliff Richard, the Crown Prosecution Service has confirmed. | A second person has challenged the decision not to bring sexual assault charges against Sir Cliff Richard, the Crown Prosecution Service has confirmed. |
The veteran singer was the subject of a long-running South Yorkshire police investigation which centred on accusations dating between 1958 and 1983 made by four men. | |
Officers investigating allegations of historical sex offences were filmed searching his apartment in Berkshire in 2014, leading to him being publicly named as the subject of the investigation. | Officers investigating allegations of historical sex offences were filmed searching his apartment in Berkshire in 2014, leading to him being publicly named as the subject of the investigation. |
The 75-year-old was never arrested or charged and his case was discontinued by the CPS in June on the grounds of insufficient evidence. Richard denies any wrongdoing. | The 75-year-old was never arrested or charged and his case was discontinued by the CPS in June on the grounds of insufficient evidence. Richard denies any wrongdoing. |
But at the beginning of August an application under the victim’s right to review scheme was lodged by an accuser, challenging the decision by the CPS not to pursue a case against Richard. | |
The process allows an alleged victim, within three months of the original decision, to call for it to be reviewed. | The process allows an alleged victim, within three months of the original decision, to call for it to be reviewed. |
Prosecutors would not confirm any further details regarding the second challenge, which was announced on Friday. | Prosecutors would not confirm any further details regarding the second challenge, which was announced on Friday. |
When the investigation was brought to a close in June, Richard said he was “thrilled”. | |
“I have always maintained my innocence, co-operated fully with the investigation, and cannot understand why it has taken so long to get to this point,” he said. | “I have always maintained my innocence, co-operated fully with the investigation, and cannot understand why it has taken so long to get to this point,” he said. |
“Nevertheless, I am obviously thrilled that the vile accusations and the resulting investigation have finally been brought to a close.” | “Nevertheless, I am obviously thrilled that the vile accusations and the resulting investigation have finally been brought to a close.” |
Following the announcement of the second challenge, a spokesman for the entertainer said: “Sir Cliff reaffirms his innocence and has every confidence the CPS will come to the right conclusion as soon as possible.” | Following the announcement of the second challenge, a spokesman for the entertainer said: “Sir Cliff reaffirms his innocence and has every confidence the CPS will come to the right conclusion as soon as possible.” |