This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/sep/09/second-person-challenges-cps-decision-not-to-charge-sir-cliff-richard

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Second person challenges CPS decision not to charge Sir Cliff Richard Second person challenges CPS decision not to charge Sir Cliff Richard
(35 minutes later)
A second person has challenged the decision not to bring sexual assault charges against Sir Cliff Richard, the Crown Prosecution Service has confirmed.A second person has challenged the decision not to bring sexual assault charges against Sir Cliff Richard, the Crown Prosecution Service has confirmed.
The veteran singer was the subject of a long-running South Yorkshire Police investigation which centred on accusations dating between 1958 and 1983 made by four men. The veteran singer was the subject of a long-running South Yorkshire police investigation which centred on accusations dating between 1958 and 1983 made by four men.
Officers investigating allegations of historical sex offences were filmed searching his apartment in Berkshire in 2014, leading to him being publicly named as the subject of the investigation.Officers investigating allegations of historical sex offences were filmed searching his apartment in Berkshire in 2014, leading to him being publicly named as the subject of the investigation.
The 75-year-old was never arrested or charged and his case was discontinued by the CPS in June on the grounds of insufficient evidence. Richard denies any wrongdoing.The 75-year-old was never arrested or charged and his case was discontinued by the CPS in June on the grounds of insufficient evidence. Richard denies any wrongdoing.
But at the beginning of August an application under the victims’ right to review scheme was lodged by an accuser challenging the decision by the CPS not to pursue a case against Sir Cliff. But at the beginning of August an application under the victim’s right to review scheme was lodged by an accuser, challenging the decision by the CPS not to pursue a case against Richard.
The process allows an alleged victim, within three months of the original decision, to call for it to be reviewed.The process allows an alleged victim, within three months of the original decision, to call for it to be reviewed.
Prosecutors would not confirm any further details regarding the second challenge, which was announced on Friday.Prosecutors would not confirm any further details regarding the second challenge, which was announced on Friday.
When the investigation was brought to a close in June, Sir Cliff said he was “thrilled”. When the investigation was brought to a close in June, Richard said he was “thrilled”.
“I have always maintained my innocence, co-operated fully with the investigation, and cannot understand why it has taken so long to get to this point,” he said.“I have always maintained my innocence, co-operated fully with the investigation, and cannot understand why it has taken so long to get to this point,” he said.
“Nevertheless, I am obviously thrilled that the vile accusations and the resulting investigation have finally been brought to a close.”“Nevertheless, I am obviously thrilled that the vile accusations and the resulting investigation have finally been brought to a close.”
Following the announcement of the second challenge, a spokesman for the entertainer said: “Sir Cliff reaffirms his innocence and has every confidence the CPS will come to the right conclusion as soon as possible.”Following the announcement of the second challenge, a spokesman for the entertainer said: “Sir Cliff reaffirms his innocence and has every confidence the CPS will come to the right conclusion as soon as possible.”