This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/10/us/judge-approves-construction-of-oil-pipeline-in-north-dakota.html
The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 3 | Version 4 |
|---|---|
| Government Pauses Construction on Part of North Dakota Pipeline | Government Pauses Construction on Part of North Dakota Pipeline |
| (about 3 hours later) | |
| BISMARCK, N.D. — The United States government ordered a pause in construction on part of a North Dakota pipeline that inspired protests among Native Americans and environmentalists on Friday. | |
| The order came after a federal judge’s ruling rejected efforts by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe to halt construction of the Dakota Access pipeline, which would run just north of their reservation boundaries. | The order came after a federal judge’s ruling rejected efforts by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe to halt construction of the Dakota Access pipeline, which would run just north of their reservation boundaries. |
| Moments after the ruling came down, the United States government in an unusual move issued a statement saying it would, for the time being, not allow the pipeline to be built underneath a dammed section of the Missouri River that has become a focal point of the pipeline dispute. The statement, from the Justice and Interior Departments and the Army, urged the pipeline company to pause construction. | Moments after the ruling came down, the United States government in an unusual move issued a statement saying it would, for the time being, not allow the pipeline to be built underneath a dammed section of the Missouri River that has become a focal point of the pipeline dispute. The statement, from the Justice and Interior Departments and the Army, urged the pipeline company to pause construction. |
| “We appreciate the District Court’s opinion on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act. However, important issues raised by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and other tribal nations and their members regarding the Dakota Access pipeline specifically, and pipeline-related decision-making generally, remain,” the statement said. | “We appreciate the District Court’s opinion on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act. However, important issues raised by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and other tribal nations and their members regarding the Dakota Access pipeline specifically, and pipeline-related decision-making generally, remain,” the statement said. |
| Tribal leaders said they were heartened by the government’s move and relieved that, for the time being, the Dakota Access pipeline would not be allowed to cross under their water supply. “When there’s a wrong that keeps continuing to happen, it’s okay to stand up against that wrong. That’s all we did,” said David Archambault II, chairman of the Standing Rock Sioux. “I’m just so thankful that agencies are starting to listen.” | |
| The ruling by Judge James E. Boasberg in Washington rejected efforts by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe to halt construction of the Dakota Access pipeline. A lawyer for the tribe says the ruling will be appealed. | The ruling by Judge James E. Boasberg in Washington rejected efforts by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe to halt construction of the Dakota Access pipeline. A lawyer for the tribe says the ruling will be appealed. |
| Although the $3.7 billion pipeline would not cross the reservation on its 1,170-mile path across four states, it would skirt the reservation’s northern boundary and run through what tribal officials say are ancestral lands. They say the pipeline would disrupt or destroy cultural and burial sites and could contaminate their water if it breaks or leaks as it crosses under a dammed section of the Missouri River. | Although the $3.7 billion pipeline would not cross the reservation on its 1,170-mile path across four states, it would skirt the reservation’s northern boundary and run through what tribal officials say are ancestral lands. They say the pipeline would disrupt or destroy cultural and burial sites and could contaminate their water if it breaks or leaks as it crosses under a dammed section of the Missouri River. |
| Many people at the protest camp and leaders of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe say they are protesting peacefully, but the events took a violent turn last weekend after a group of protesters tore down a fence and rushed contractors who had been digging up earth to lay the pipeline. | Many people at the protest camp and leaders of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe say they are protesting peacefully, but the events took a violent turn last weekend after a group of protesters tore down a fence and rushed contractors who had been digging up earth to lay the pipeline. |
| The Morton County sheriff said the workers were surrounded, kicked and hit with sticks. Tribal leaders blamed the company behind the pipeline for exacerbating tensions by hiring security guards who brought guard dogs to the construction site. Tribal officials said six demonstrators had been bitten. | The Morton County sheriff said the workers were surrounded, kicked and hit with sticks. Tribal leaders blamed the company behind the pipeline for exacerbating tensions by hiring security guards who brought guard dogs to the construction site. Tribal officials said six demonstrators had been bitten. |
| Sheriff’s officers in Morton County and other North Dakota law-enforcement agencies have increased their patrols and presence in the past two days. | Sheriff’s officers in Morton County and other North Dakota law-enforcement agencies have increased their patrols and presence in the past two days. |