This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/sep/29/trump-clinton-media-left-right-democracy

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Do you live in a Trump bubble, or a Clinton bubble? Do you live in a Trump bubble, or a Clinton bubble?
(about 13 hours later)
‘Trump wears deception as a foreskin.” Thus said Nathan, a small-business owner, when talking to me in Chicago the other day. I couldn’t have put it better myself.‘Trump wears deception as a foreskin.” Thus said Nathan, a small-business owner, when talking to me in Chicago the other day. I couldn’t have put it better myself.
A recent analysis concluded that Donald Trump averaged one lie or inaccuracy for every five minutes of speaking. There’s a great debate raging here about how the American media should cover this narcissistic, bragging, mendacious, ignorant, dangerous demagogue. But what’s happening to the media themselves is part of the problem.A recent analysis concluded that Donald Trump averaged one lie or inaccuracy for every five minutes of speaking. There’s a great debate raging here about how the American media should cover this narcissistic, bragging, mendacious, ignorant, dangerous demagogue. But what’s happening to the media themselves is part of the problem.
The journalistic consensus seems to be that television anchors and news reporters should call him out on his serial whoppers, as NBC’s Leslie Holt did when moderating Monday’s debate, and not preserve a false balance between two candidates of such disparate quality and seriousness – which would be to fall prey to what the media commentator Brooke Gladstone slyly calls fairness bias. “Ah yes, Professor Smith, thank you for arguing that the Earth is round, and now let me give equal time and ostensible respect to Mr Jones, who argues that the Earth is flat.” If you want a good recent example of fairness bias, just recall the coverage of the Brexit referendum campaign by our timid and intimidated BBC. The journalistic consensus seems to be that television anchors and news reporters should call him out on his serial whoppers, as NBC’s Lester Holt did when moderating Monday’s debate, and not preserve a false balance between two candidates of such disparate quality and seriousness – which would be to fall prey to what the media commentator Brooke Gladstone slyly calls fairness bias. “Ah yes, Professor Smith, thank you for arguing that the Earth is round, and now let me give equal time and ostensible respect to Mr Jones, who argues that the Earth is flat.” If you want a good recent example of fairness bias, just recall the coverage of the Brexit referendum campaign by our timid and intimidated BBC.
Interestingly, even the New York Times – not for nothing known as the “Grey Lady” – has abandoned its usual strict evenhandedness and circumspection. It’s not just that most days there are not just one but two or three comment pieces excoriating Trump. It’s also that the news coverage, as well as offering excellent long investigative pieces revealing Trump’s past as a businessman, charlatan and bigot, now slips in pejorative adjectives, adverbs and phrases.Interestingly, even the New York Times – not for nothing known as the “Grey Lady” – has abandoned its usual strict evenhandedness and circumspection. It’s not just that most days there are not just one but two or three comment pieces excoriating Trump. It’s also that the news coverage, as well as offering excellent long investigative pieces revealing Trump’s past as a businessman, charlatan and bigot, now slips in pejorative adjectives, adverbs and phrases.
I can totally understand why the New York Times has departed from its usual practice. As it argued in an editorial, Trump is “the worst nominee put forward by a major party in modern American history”. He is a threat to civil peace at home and the country’s standing abroad. An Italian friend compares it to the reaction of the newspaper La Repubblica when faced with the resistible rise of Silvio Berlusconi.I can totally understand why the New York Times has departed from its usual practice. As it argued in an editorial, Trump is “the worst nominee put forward by a major party in modern American history”. He is a threat to civil peace at home and the country’s standing abroad. An Italian friend compares it to the reaction of the newspaper La Repubblica when faced with the resistible rise of Silvio Berlusconi.
Unfortunately this taking sides may reinforce a structural trend that is itself corrosive of US democracy. The most characteristic American argument for free speech and for what we still anachronistically call a free “press” – as explicitly mentioned in the first amendment – is that this is necessary for democratic self-government: only if citizens can hear all the relevant arguments and evidence, as ancient Athenians did when they gathered on the Pnyx at the foot of the Acropolis, will they be able to make an informed choice and therefore meaningfully be said to be governing themselves. First voice, then vote. So you have to hear the arguments and evidence from both sides.Unfortunately this taking sides may reinforce a structural trend that is itself corrosive of US democracy. The most characteristic American argument for free speech and for what we still anachronistically call a free “press” – as explicitly mentioned in the first amendment – is that this is necessary for democratic self-government: only if citizens can hear all the relevant arguments and evidence, as ancient Athenians did when they gathered on the Pnyx at the foot of the Acropolis, will they be able to make an informed choice and therefore meaningfully be said to be governing themselves. First voice, then vote. So you have to hear the arguments and evidence from both sides.
But in this respect Monday’s television duel between the two candidates is the exception that proves the rule: a brief moment of shared experience in the public square. The rest of the time, American voters are off in their own echo chambers, hearing views that reinforce their own.But in this respect Monday’s television duel between the two candidates is the exception that proves the rule: a brief moment of shared experience in the public square. The rest of the time, American voters are off in their own echo chambers, hearing views that reinforce their own.
This echo chamber effect was first noticed on the internet, where people identified the “information cocoon” and “filter bubble”; but this is now a defining feature of the entire media landscape, not just online and not only in the US. There is both a free-market profusion of sources of news and views, and a corresponding fragmentation.This echo chamber effect was first noticed on the internet, where people identified the “information cocoon” and “filter bubble”; but this is now a defining feature of the entire media landscape, not just online and not only in the US. There is both a free-market profusion of sources of news and views, and a corresponding fragmentation.
Trump voters get theirs from Fox News, rightwing radio talk shows, internet sources such as Breitbart (whose supremo is now employed by Trump as a key campaign adviser) and their Facebook friends; Clinton voters get theirs from MSNBC, National Public Radio, Public Broadcasting Service, internet sources like Slate or the Huffington Post, like-minded people on social media – and that now clearly anti-Trump organ, the New York Times.Trump voters get theirs from Fox News, rightwing radio talk shows, internet sources such as Breitbart (whose supremo is now employed by Trump as a key campaign adviser) and their Facebook friends; Clinton voters get theirs from MSNBC, National Public Radio, Public Broadcasting Service, internet sources like Slate or the Huffington Post, like-minded people on social media – and that now clearly anti-Trump organ, the New York Times.
Since the internet has demolished the traditional business model of newspapers, while allowing a fantastic profusion of sources, everyone (the Guardian included) is competing furiously for eyeballs and mouse clicks in this crowded, hectic 24/7 arena – the virtual equivalent of a traditional stock exchange trading floor. Shout, shout, SHOUT. If it bleeds, it leads. If it roars, it scores.Since the internet has demolished the traditional business model of newspapers, while allowing a fantastic profusion of sources, everyone (the Guardian included) is competing furiously for eyeballs and mouse clicks in this crowded, hectic 24/7 arena – the virtual equivalent of a traditional stock exchange trading floor. Shout, shout, SHOUT. If it bleeds, it leads. If it roars, it scores.
Nuanced, balanced, evidence-based reporting has difficulty making itself heard among the hubbub. Technological possibilities, commercial imperatives, and perhaps also cultural changes combine to turn deliberative democracy into infotainment. Reality TV trumps reality. Like Berlusconi, the showbusinessman and former reality TV star Trump is both a product and a creator of this brave new world. He is the Jerry Springer of American democracy.Nuanced, balanced, evidence-based reporting has difficulty making itself heard among the hubbub. Technological possibilities, commercial imperatives, and perhaps also cultural changes combine to turn deliberative democracy into infotainment. Reality TV trumps reality. Like Berlusconi, the showbusinessman and former reality TV star Trump is both a product and a creator of this brave new world. He is the Jerry Springer of American democracy.
Besides the so-called alt-right, we now have alt-reality, where facts, evidence and expert opinion give way to myths, wild exaggerations, lies and powerful simplistic narratives. (Trump’s “Make America great again”, the Brexiteers’ “Take back control”.) Historians of propaganda know that lies prevail by sheer mind-numbing repetition, crowding out the truth. The 24/7 multiplatform echo chambers of partisan media and prejudice-reinforcing social media have a similar effect.Besides the so-called alt-right, we now have alt-reality, where facts, evidence and expert opinion give way to myths, wild exaggerations, lies and powerful simplistic narratives. (Trump’s “Make America great again”, the Brexiteers’ “Take back control”.) Historians of propaganda know that lies prevail by sheer mind-numbing repetition, crowding out the truth. The 24/7 multiplatform echo chambers of partisan media and prejudice-reinforcing social media have a similar effect.
I once had the hilarious experience of defending a book of mine called Facts Are Subversive on the satirical Colbert Report. What do you mean, cried Stephen Colbert, I don’t want facts to subvert me and make me feel uncomfortable, I want things to make me feel good! He famously invented the term “truthiness” to describe this comforting alternative to truth.I once had the hilarious experience of defending a book of mine called Facts Are Subversive on the satirical Colbert Report. What do you mean, cried Stephen Colbert, I don’t want facts to subvert me and make me feel uncomfortable, I want things to make me feel good! He famously invented the term “truthiness” to describe this comforting alternative to truth.
Well, it’s a good thing Colbert has moved on to another comedy show, because in the meantime real life has overtaken his satire. Trump is the grand master of truthiness. Although he has now abandoned the birther lie about President Obama, ludicrously blaming it on Hillary Clinton, one of his tweets after Obama had made public his birth certificate perfectly exemplifies his truthiness. Trump often covers himself by saying “a lot of people think”, but this tweet went one further, from think to feel. It said: “A lot of people feel it wasn’t a proper certificate.” And you know what, I feel that the Earth is flat.Well, it’s a good thing Colbert has moved on to another comedy show, because in the meantime real life has overtaken his satire. Trump is the grand master of truthiness. Although he has now abandoned the birther lie about President Obama, ludicrously blaming it on Hillary Clinton, one of his tweets after Obama had made public his birth certificate perfectly exemplifies his truthiness. Trump often covers himself by saying “a lot of people think”, but this tweet went one further, from think to feel. It said: “A lot of people feel it wasn’t a proper certificate.” And you know what, I feel that the Earth is flat.
Both candidates actually alluded to these rival echo chambers in Monday’s televised debate. Clinton got out her well-rehearsed line: “Donald, I know you live in your own reality.” Trump’s was less practised, unintentionally funnier and more revealing: “I think the best person in her campaign is mainstream media.” This line is characteristic of so much populist rhetoric across the world, from the US to France and Poland to India, suggesting that your supporters are an embattled group oppressed by powerful liberal elites, and they alone are the “real people” (a phrase often used by Ukip’s Nigel Farage).Both candidates actually alluded to these rival echo chambers in Monday’s televised debate. Clinton got out her well-rehearsed line: “Donald, I know you live in your own reality.” Trump’s was less practised, unintentionally funnier and more revealing: “I think the best person in her campaign is mainstream media.” This line is characteristic of so much populist rhetoric across the world, from the US to France and Poland to India, suggesting that your supporters are an embattled group oppressed by powerful liberal elites, and they alone are the “real people” (a phrase often used by Ukip’s Nigel Farage).
The distortion is worse on the populist right, but tendentious media polarisation, simplistic shouting and echo chambers are a problem on all sides. Although the US has free, uncensored, diverse media, these are less and less offering the shared public square we need for deliberative democracy. The distortion is worse on the populist right, but tendentious media polarisation, simplistic shouting and echo chambers are a problem on all sides. Although the US has free, uncensored, diverse media, these are less and less offering the shared public square we need for deliberative democracy.
A noble American cliche invites us to believe in the “marketplace of ideas”. What we are witnessing in this election is a market failure.A noble American cliche invites us to believe in the “marketplace of ideas”. What we are witnessing in this election is a market failure.