This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/oct/11/london-garden-bridge-report-national-audit-office-public-money
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| London garden bridge report says £20m of public money may have been wasted | London garden bridge report says £20m of public money may have been wasted |
| (about 1 hour later) | |
| Ministers have potentially wasted more than £20m of public money on London’s controversial garden bridge, having more than once committed extra funds to the project against official advice, according to a report from the National Audit Office (NAO). | Ministers have potentially wasted more than £20m of public money on London’s controversial garden bridge, having more than once committed extra funds to the project against official advice, according to a report from the National Audit Office (NAO). |
| It found that the initial decision by George Osborne to help finance the scheme, strongly championed by the then London mayor Boris Johnson, with a £30m grant from the Department for Transport (DfT), was taken despite there being questionable transport or tourism benefits. | It found that the initial decision by George Osborne to help finance the scheme, strongly championed by the then London mayor Boris Johnson, with a £30m grant from the Department for Transport (DfT), was taken despite there being questionable transport or tourism benefits. |
| The report casts additional doubt on the heavily delayed project, which already faces severe difficulties. Last month, the London mayor, Sadiq Khan, set up an inquiry into the use of a combined £60m of public money, much of which has been spent before construction has begun. | The report casts additional doubt on the heavily delayed project, which already faces severe difficulties. Last month, the London mayor, Sadiq Khan, set up an inquiry into the use of a combined £60m of public money, much of which has been spent before construction has begun. |
| Ministers initially set an £8.2m limit on how much of the DfT’s £30m grant could be spent on pre-construction work for the tree and plant-filled bridge across the Thames in central London. However, this limit was then raised twice, to £9.95m in June 2015 and by another £3.5m the following year, along with an extra financial guarantee if work were cancelled. | Ministers initially set an £8.2m limit on how much of the DfT’s £30m grant could be spent on pre-construction work for the tree and plant-filled bridge across the Thames in central London. However, this limit was then raised twice, to £9.95m in June 2015 and by another £3.5m the following year, along with an extra financial guarantee if work were cancelled. |
| The report from the NAO, the independent government spending watchdog, said: “Officials from the department advised ministers against increasing the department’s exposure for the second and third increases.” | The report from the NAO, the independent government spending watchdog, said: “Officials from the department advised ministers against increasing the department’s exposure for the second and third increases.” |
| It noted a “pattern of behaviour” throughout the project in which the Garden Bridge Trust, the charity behind the Thomas Heatherwick-designed project, repeatedly asked the DfT for more money when it encountered challenges. “The department, in turn, has agreed to these requests,” the report said. | It noted a “pattern of behaviour” throughout the project in which the Garden Bridge Trust, the charity behind the Thomas Heatherwick-designed project, repeatedly asked the DfT for more money when it encountered challenges. “The department, in turn, has agreed to these requests,” the report said. |
| Meg Hillier, the Labour MP who chairs the powerful Commons public accounts committee, likened the pattern of repeated requests for more public money to the collapse of the Kids Company charity. “It worries me that whenever the Garden Bridge Trust runs into financial trouble, the Department for Transport releases more taxpayers’ money before construction has even started,” she said. “If the project collapses,taxpayers stand to lose £22.5m.” | Meg Hillier, the Labour MP who chairs the powerful Commons public accounts committee, likened the pattern of repeated requests for more public money to the collapse of the Kids Company charity. “It worries me that whenever the Garden Bridge Trust runs into financial trouble, the Department for Transport releases more taxpayers’ money before construction has even started,” she said. “If the project collapses,taxpayers stand to lose £22.5m.” |
| Tim Farron, the Liberal Democrat leader, said the bridge was “a vanity project” for Johnson, and it was up to Khan to quash it. He added: “It is an unnecessary expenditure and will have little benefit to Londoners.” | |
| The NAO found that the government’s liabilities towards the scheme stand at £22.5m if the bridge is not built, which the report says is possible. | The NAO found that the government’s liabilities towards the scheme stand at £22.5m if the bridge is not built, which the report says is possible. |
| “There remains a significant risk that the project will not go ahead,” it said. The Garden Bridge Trust has yet to secure the necessary sub-lease on the area of the South Bank where the bridge will land, the report notes, while the main contractor has been put on standby and construction has been delayed for at least 18 months. | “There remains a significant risk that the project will not go ahead,” it said. The Garden Bridge Trust has yet to secure the necessary sub-lease on the area of the South Bank where the bridge will land, the report notes, while the main contractor has been put on standby and construction has been delayed for at least 18 months. |
| The government’s involvement in the planned 366m (1,200ft) structure running from Temple to the South Bank, intended to hold 270 trees and thousands of plants, began in 2013 when the then chancellor Osborne agreed the £30m grant with Johnson, to be directed through the DfT. | The government’s involvement in the planned 366m (1,200ft) structure running from Temple to the South Bank, intended to hold 270 trees and thousands of plants, began in 2013 when the then chancellor Osborne agreed the £30m grant with Johnson, to be directed through the DfT. |
| This happened despite the department finding that the transport case for the pedestrian bridge in terms of faster walking times was minimal and benefits from tourism were “considered highly uncertain”. | This happened despite the department finding that the transport case for the pedestrian bridge in terms of faster walking times was minimal and benefits from tourism were “considered highly uncertain”. |
| “The department agreed to make the £30m investment in spite of its concerns about the value for money of the bridge,” the NAO said. | “The department agreed to make the £30m investment in spite of its concerns about the value for money of the bridge,” the NAO said. |
| In May 2016, ministers agreed to underwrite cancellation liabilities of up to £15m, giving a peak DfT liability of £28.5m. The guarantee was reduced later that year to £9m. | In May 2016, ministers agreed to underwrite cancellation liabilities of up to £15m, giving a peak DfT liability of £28.5m. The guarantee was reduced later that year to £9m. |
| The DfT receives written monthly updates from the Garden Bridge Trust on the project, but these do not contain “standard project performance information,” such as progress against schedule and budget, or details of the trust’s progress against fundraising targets, the NAO noted. | The DfT receives written monthly updates from the Garden Bridge Trust on the project, but these do not contain “standard project performance information,” such as progress against schedule and budget, or details of the trust’s progress against fundraising targets, the NAO noted. |
| Public investment accounts for £60m of the scheme’s projected £185m cost, of which Transport for London provided £30m, with £20m of this later turned into a long-term loan. The remainder is still being raised from private donors. | Public investment accounts for £60m of the scheme’s projected £185m cost, of which Transport for London provided £30m, with £20m of this later turned into a long-term loan. The remainder is still being raised from private donors. |
| The NAO report noted that one of the reasons the trust repeatedly asked for more DfT cash to be spent before construction was the unwillingness of private donors for their money to be used before they were sure the bridge would be built. | The NAO report noted that one of the reasons the trust repeatedly asked for more DfT cash to be spent before construction was the unwillingness of private donors for their money to be used before they were sure the bridge would be built. |
| It said the DfT’s accounting officer warned against the department agreeing the cancellation guarantee, being “concerned that the government was already taking on more risk than private sector donors”. He also “believed the department to be at the very limit of what he regarded as proportionate or prudent financial exposure to the risk of the project not proceeding”, the report said. | It said the DfT’s accounting officer warned against the department agreeing the cancellation guarantee, being “concerned that the government was already taking on more risk than private sector donors”. He also “believed the department to be at the very limit of what he regarded as proportionate or prudent financial exposure to the risk of the project not proceeding”, the report said. |
| In a statement, the Garden Bridge Trust said it was creating “a visionary project”, and that it welcomed proper scrutiny. The £60m of public money was “always intended to always intended to kick start private investment, it said, arguing that the total cost to the taxpayer would be no more than the pedestrian Millennium bridge nearby. | In a statement, the Garden Bridge Trust said it was creating “a visionary project”, and that it welcomed proper scrutiny. The £60m of public money was “always intended to always intended to kick start private investment, it said, arguing that the total cost to the taxpayer would be no more than the pedestrian Millennium bridge nearby. |
| It added: “The trust has not and is not asking for additional funding. We are grateful for the support of both the government and the mayor of London as we embark on raising the final private funding.” | It added: “The trust has not and is not asking for additional funding. We are grateful for the support of both the government and the mayor of London as we embark on raising the final private funding.” |
| Junior DfT minister Lord Ahmad said the department would “consider the NAO’s findings carefully”. | |
| He said: “The government remains supportive of the garden bridge project and ministers took into account a wide range of factors before deciding whether or not to make funding available. | |
| “The taxpayer, however, must not be exposed to any further risks and it is now for the trust to find private sector backers to invest in the delivery of this project.” |