This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/oct/17/morally-and-legally-the-uk-government-has-failed-us-on-air-pollution
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Morally and legally, the UK government has failed us on air pollution Morally and legally, the UK government has failed us on air pollution | |
| (about 1 month later) | |
| No less than 17 years have passed since new rules were approved in the UK to save thousands of lives by limiting deadly air pollution in our towns and cities. | No less than 17 years have passed since new rules were approved in the UK to save thousands of lives by limiting deadly air pollution in our towns and cities. |
| Pollution is the “invisible killer” because, for the most part, it goes unseen. Its impact on human health and the planet is why those laws were necessary. | Pollution is the “invisible killer” because, for the most part, it goes unseen. Its impact on human health and the planet is why those laws were necessary. |
| Yet disgracefully – and illegally – we are still subjected to excruciatingly dirty air. Conditions are sometimes so poor that you notice it in your nostrils or lungs. Those days, when the air feels thick with fumes, you may be under the impression that it’s just one vehicle with a bad exhaust in front of you which is to blame. It’s generally not. | Yet disgracefully – and illegally – we are still subjected to excruciatingly dirty air. Conditions are sometimes so poor that you notice it in your nostrils or lungs. Those days, when the air feels thick with fumes, you may be under the impression that it’s just one vehicle with a bad exhaust in front of you which is to blame. It’s generally not. |
| London’s pollution – the worst in the UK – was visible on a trip I made to Canary Wharf a few weeks ago. From the 11th floor, a brown haze sat across the skyline, its deadly toxins testing the health of millions of city-dwellers and workers, particularly those who suffer from asthma, heart or respiratory conditions. | London’s pollution – the worst in the UK – was visible on a trip I made to Canary Wharf a few weeks ago. From the 11th floor, a brown haze sat across the skyline, its deadly toxins testing the health of millions of city-dwellers and workers, particularly those who suffer from asthma, heart or respiratory conditions. |
| Pollution is right there with you when you’re puffing as you cycle through the park on a summer’s day, or when you’re chatting with friends on a visit to the shops on a Saturday morning, or when you’re taking your child to school. | Pollution is right there with you when you’re puffing as you cycle through the park on a summer’s day, or when you’re chatting with friends on a visit to the shops on a Saturday morning, or when you’re taking your child to school. |
| Why are you and I are still inhaling unlawful levels of nitrogen dioxide nearly 20 years after it should have been cleaned up? | Why are you and I are still inhaling unlawful levels of nitrogen dioxide nearly 20 years after it should have been cleaned up? |
| There is a simple answer: because the UK government is breaking its own and the EU’s laws. | There is a simple answer: because the UK government is breaking its own and the EU’s laws. |
| It has failed to protect your health and mine, and more importantly the health of our children. It has failed legally. And it has failed morally. | It has failed to protect your health and mine, and more importantly the health of our children. It has failed legally. And it has failed morally. |
| ClientEarth is taking the government back to court on Tuesday, because of the lack of urgency, the failure to tackle the problem. Cleaning the air isn’t rocket science. Not doing so is simply unacceptable political behaviour. | ClientEarth is taking the government back to court on Tuesday, because of the lack of urgency, the failure to tackle the problem. Cleaning the air isn’t rocket science. Not doing so is simply unacceptable political behaviour. |
| The fact that it’s taken the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra) 18 months to launch a consultation on just five clean air zones – when there are many more badly polluted towns and cities across the UK – is just one illustration of that lackadaisical attitude. | The fact that it’s taken the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra) 18 months to launch a consultation on just five clean air zones – when there are many more badly polluted towns and cities across the UK – is just one illustration of that lackadaisical attitude. |
| In April last year, in our first legal challenge, the supreme court ordered the environment secretary to draw up a new Air Quality plan to meet legal limits in the shortest time possible. The plan was woefully inadequate and didn’t envisage UK compliance on pollution levels until 2025. That would be 26 years since the rules were first approved. | In April last year, in our first legal challenge, the supreme court ordered the environment secretary to draw up a new Air Quality plan to meet legal limits in the shortest time possible. The plan was woefully inadequate and didn’t envisage UK compliance on pollution levels until 2025. That would be 26 years since the rules were first approved. |
| Not only that, but while motor manufacturers have been exploiting legal loopholes and using dubious techniques to pass emissions tests, the government has failed to hold them to account - while bidding behind the scenes to allow increased emissions. | Not only that, but while motor manufacturers have been exploiting legal loopholes and using dubious techniques to pass emissions tests, the government has failed to hold them to account - while bidding behind the scenes to allow increased emissions. |
| The Treasury, meanwhile, is still giving incentives through the tax system, for motorists to buy diesel cars. That is also unacceptable. | The Treasury, meanwhile, is still giving incentives through the tax system, for motorists to buy diesel cars. That is also unacceptable. |
| A reason some give for not taking action to solve this public health crisis is the cost to the economy and the Treasury and the impact on business, hauliers and motorists. But surely the health impacts of pollution are worth more than that? | A reason some give for not taking action to solve this public health crisis is the cost to the economy and the Treasury and the impact on business, hauliers and motorists. But surely the health impacts of pollution are worth more than that? |
| Pollution is responsible for 40,000 premature deaths in the UK. It triggers heart attacks and strokes. It can make existing heart conditions worse. It causes cancer and stunted lung growth in children. It aggravates respiratory conditions which can be fatal. | Pollution is responsible for 40,000 premature deaths in the UK. It triggers heart attacks and strokes. It can make existing heart conditions worse. It causes cancer and stunted lung growth in children. It aggravates respiratory conditions which can be fatal. |
| But there is also a substantial economic and societal impact. Defra’s own analysis suggests that the cost to the economy from early deaths by air pollution is £27.5bn. Every year. | But there is also a substantial economic and societal impact. Defra’s own analysis suggests that the cost to the economy from early deaths by air pollution is £27.5bn. Every year. |
| So what should the government be doing? A national network of Clean Air Zones, preventing the worst polluting vehicles from entering our towns and city centres; a scheme to retrofit buses and heavy goods vehicles to make them compliant with legal emissions limits; and a targeted diesel scrappage scheme part funded by the car industry – used to fund low emission vehicles and alternatives to car use. | So what should the government be doing? A national network of Clean Air Zones, preventing the worst polluting vehicles from entering our towns and city centres; a scheme to retrofit buses and heavy goods vehicles to make them compliant with legal emissions limits; and a targeted diesel scrappage scheme part funded by the car industry – used to fund low emission vehicles and alternatives to car use. |
| Other solutions should run in tandem: a clean public transport system and a car labelling scheme so that motorists know they cars they are buying are compliant with emissions limits in the real world. | Other solutions should run in tandem: a clean public transport system and a car labelling scheme so that motorists know they cars they are buying are compliant with emissions limits in the real world. |
| That would be a start. There is also a great opportunity: to move the economy toward zero emission vehicles. We could become a leader in sustainable energy, and sustainable cities. | That would be a start. There is also a great opportunity: to move the economy toward zero emission vehicles. We could become a leader in sustainable energy, and sustainable cities. |
| The air law will be UK law under the government’s Brexit plans. It should be made even stronger in future with a new Clean Air Act. | The air law will be UK law under the government’s Brexit plans. It should be made even stronger in future with a new Clean Air Act. |
| First, we need to win this court case to make sure the government understands that pollution is a health hazard which we – or rather they – can solve. | First, we need to win this court case to make sure the government understands that pollution is a health hazard which we – or rather they – can solve. |